Q Anon: 12/18/18 Trust Trump's Plan

>Droopy eyes is going to have milk and cookies and go to bed
YOU’RE GOING TO EAT SANTA’S SNACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
********************************************************************************
SANTA’S NOT HERE RIGHT NOW. Besides I have it on good authority he like Pretzels and Beer.

481 posted on 12/19/2018 5:23:12 PM PST by greeneyes

53-47 active when?
EO (designated_target(s)) active when?
Ongoing investigations…..
Q

New Senate, what, January 3rd?

EQ is the Executive Order going active January 1st, yes?

Ongoing investigations (Huber/Horowitz).

#The1stAlarm

#[D]Day?

Bagster

482 posted on 12/19/2018 5:27:53 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

All this news about Trump pulling out of Syria got me to thinking. This story is from June of this year. A pull paragraph;

Any new prisoner would be the first to arrive at Guantánamo since the CIA delivered an Afghan “high-value detainee” in March 2008. That was years before the so-called Islamic State in Iraq and Syria declared its worldwide caliphate, invaded and controlled a huge swath of Iraq and Syria and released a series of brutal videotaped killings of captives in orange jumpsuits.

No terrorists since 2008 BUT it’s being totally revamped for new prisoners. Prisoners from a war we just ended? Nope. Q proof, imo, that arrests will be made.

Anyone see Rubio and Graham’s comments about Trump pulling out of Syria? I’ve been looking at a number of those stories as well. IMO, Rubio is dirty. Lindsey Graham is still questionable. They are both tainted by the stink of no name.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/01/25/epic-tulsi-gabbard-calls-adam-kinzinger-john-mccain-and-evan-mcmullin-terrorist-enablers/

https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/12/19/lindsey-graham-obama-like-move-for-trump-to-withdraw-troops-from-syria/

Hey Lindsey Hey Rubio! Pulling out of Syria makes us “less safe”. HOW ABOUT NOT BUILDING THE WALL MAKES US “LESS SAFE”?
GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!

483 posted on 12/19/2018 5:36:42 PM PST by upsdriver (retired from ups since 2009)

To: Jack Black; bagster

Here is Goodlatte discussing turning over the house investigation to the senate judiciary committee.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/11/18/sunday-talks-bob-goodlatte-discusses-turning-over-doj-fbi-probe-to-senate/

484 posted on 12/19/2018 5:38:56 PM PST by BiggBob

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3713951/posts?page=37#37

To: laplata

The 412th Engineer Command provides theater-level engineer support to the Combatant Commander in the event of a contingency operation. It is designed to command hundreds of engineer units and thousands of Soldiers in a war fighting capacity. The Command has historical training relationships in the Pacific and European theaters, and provides direct support to the Eighth US Army in Korea. The Command also is the Army Reserve’s Executive Agent for Operation Sand Castle at Fort Irwin, CA, which is a 10-year urban terrain construction mission for engineer units conducting their Annual Training. Prior to mobilization, the 412th ENCOM is under operational control of the Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

As an operational command, the 412th has 3 brigades and 96 other assigned units with approximately 10,000 Soldiers located throughout the southeast and northeast U.S. These units include the 926th Engineer Brigade, 411th Engineer Brigade, 302d Maneuver Enhancement Brigade, and the 314th Press Camp Headquarters.

Soooo....

Looks like Trump can activate these reservists (not National Guard) and use them to build the wall. Note in the description how they’ve gained experience in “urban terrain construction.”

Sounds like a border wall to me.

Go Trump - MAGA
Go Melania aka Lady MAGA

Q is real

37 posted on 12/19/2018, 1:36:14 PM by HombreSecreto (The new Oldsmobiles are in early this year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

485 posted on 12/19/2018 5:43:07 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)

486 posted on 12/19/2018 5:45:07 PM PST by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

To: Larry - Moe and Curly

“There is a reason why SH, SC, and JS are on stage.”

Sean Hannity, Sara Carter, John Solomon ?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That's how I read it, though I am less certain of the Hannity ID than the other two.

It has been clear for some time that SC and JS have privileged access to POTUS team, presumably at least overlapping with Q team.

In terms of an orchestra: SC and JS are the oboe section ... Hannity, Rush, Levin, Dobbs and Elder the other woodwinds ... MAGA nation the percussion ... Q the concert master (principal violin) ... FReeQs and anons the rest of the strings ... POTUS the conductor and (obviously) the brass. His tweets are flutes.

487 posted on 12/19/2018 5:47:04 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; haffast; bagster

Hey now, the formerly esteemed Judge Napolitano has been vying for the Corsi Award. Perhaps there should be a Whale Of The Year for our mocking pleasure. Please though, remember, we should try to punch down. I feel a little bad for Dr. Corsi now that he’s gotten himself into trouble.

488 posted on 12/19/2018 5:47:59 PM PST by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)

Why are they seeking 1 beeellion dollars for this man. One beeellion is an outrageous amount of money.

489 posted on 12/19/2018 5:51:29 PM PST by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)

From the article:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3713951/posts?page=1#1

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3713951/posts

“...But on Dec. 11, following Trump’s initial claims that he would direct the military to begin wall construction, Pentagon spokesman Army Lt. Col. Jamie Davis said, “to date, there is no plan to build sections of the wall.”

“However, Congress has provided options under Title 10 U.S. Code that could permit the Defense Department to fund border barrier projects, such as in support of counter drug operations or national emergencies.” “

OR NATIONAL EMERGENCIES

Also see:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3713951/posts?page=81#81

To: frog in a pot; bert

“COE could do it with minimal effort. By using competitive-bid, multiple regional prime contractors who were familiar with local conditions together with on-site 24/7 COE inspectors”

The US Army Corps of Engineers is already managing the contracting for Homeland Security. Two big standing contracts have been established (an East and a West), and a pool of contractors are pre-approved. They have already been using them to bid on and award segments of the wall. Two of those segments (Calexico, CA and Santa Teresa, NM) are already finished.

All they need is money (a valid fund cite code).

- W9126G18R0092 Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Horizontal Construction Services in support of the Rio Grande Valley, Laredo, Del Rio, Big Bend and El Paso Border Patrol Sectors

- W9126G18R0096 Multiple Award Task Order Contract (Matoc) For Horizontal Construction Services In Support Of The San Diego, El Centro, Yuma, And Tucson Border Patrol Sectors

81 posted on 12/19/2018, 2:35:03 PM by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

490 posted on 12/19/2018 5:52:40 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)

*Winky Face*

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yeah, I noticed that exchange too.

But I think Mockingbird is a C_A operation. Did I miss something? (quite possible)

491 posted on 12/19/2018 5:57:26 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian

Heresy!
He’s a Gibson guy!

492 posted on 12/19/2018 5:57:27 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

If this is the day, then D5 is Christmas Day.

493 posted on 12/19/2018 5:58:45 PM PST by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)

To: mairdie; Aquamarine

Awesome video! Thanks!

494 posted on 12/19/2018 5:59:17 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch

To: Disestablishmentarian

But I think Mockingbird is a C_A operation. Did I miss something? (quite possible)

Yes it is, but I believe that our guys have their own version of "mockingbird" and that it includes certain media figures, and internet publications.

The Q team has been leaking stories through, not only SH, SC, and JS, but certain online pubs.

I just call it "Q's (Trump's) Mockingbird Op" to be a clever boy.

I sometimes spell it "MoQingbird".

#BagsterCode

Bagster

495 posted on 12/19/2018 6:04:19 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

1. What does "nukka" mean?
2. What does "House >>> Senate" mean?

I would interpret that as the House is greater, greater, greater than the Senate.

Regardless, I'll stand by my claim that the Senate won't effectively take up the work that Nunes and a few others were doing in the House.

The Intel Committee is, as stated above, deeply corrupt. The Judiciary committee -- well let's just think back to the horrible Kavanaugh hearings, you can't possibly expect that crew to bring down the Deep State.

Grassley seems like a good man, but lacks the killer instinct to bring anyone down.

And, now that you've brought it up, weren't we supposed to "trust Sessions"? How's that workin' out for ya?

I'm not providing "disinformation", which is actually an amusing claim for you to make. And I'm certainly not pushing anyone to be demoralized.

Trump has done great things for America in his first two years, and hopefully he is able to do more in the next two.

But there is no reason to refuse to look critically at where we are.

Trump is going into 2019 with a much tougher environment than he started with in 2017. The tough d interesting questions are can he avoid impreachment and indictment and make progress on his agenda. And what's his best plan to do that?

Of course the 40,000 indictments could be unsealed any day now. I notice a lot of FreeQs have now fixated on early 2019.

My end of year Q tally looks pretty good. Skepticism won in 2018. That doesn't mean it will win again in 2019, but I suspect it will.

496 posted on 12/19/2018 6:05:09 PM PST by Jack Black ("If you believe in things that you don't understand then you suffer" - "Superstition",Stevie Wonder)

Even more reason to call Hannity [nd Rush!] to comment on any topic. When you get the moment, tell them:

“Thanks for taking my call, Q sent me.”

Then launch into the comment.

497 posted on 12/19/2018 6:05:10 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

To: All; little jeremiah; haffast; TrueFact; TheConservativeParty

On the previous thread, I posted the request below in italics.

In repsonse to the replies from little jeremiah, haffast, TrueFact, and TheConservativeParty, the following table was created. Hope this can be a good resource for others to share with Q rookies.

Title	Description	Type	Length	Date	Author	Link
Q For Beginners Part 1 - Who is Q?	Q Tutorial	Youtube	4:49	6/24/2018	prayingmedic	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vYqqH3-xFY
Q For Beginners Part 2 - How to Find Q posts	Q Tutorial	Youtube	10:02	6/25/2018	prayingmedic	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymIENvtcJqo
Q Anon Made Simple - January 14, 2018	Q Tutorial	Youtube	36:11	1/15/2018	prayingmedic	https://youtu.be/JmaMv_w7JJE
Praying Medical Youtube Channel	Q Tutorial	Youtube			prayingmedic	https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected	This 6-minute link is a speech that lays the basis for the rise of Q. The speech exposes the failure of the two-party system that plays off of one another in an allusion of a democracy.	Youtube	5:48	10/24/2016	Berikande Mångfald	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
Q - We Are The Plan	Q Tutorial	Youtube	9:10	10/17/2018	Storm Is Upon Us	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRtEgdgj_XQ
All About Q Anon With Dan Duval - Part 2	Q Tutorial	Youtube	1:11:31	8/14/2018	prayingmedic	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hb41h875Xh0&t=7s
Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval - Part 3	Q Tutorial	Youtube	1:04:49	11/16/2018	prayingmedic	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7GLR4yLo94
The combined evidence in this thread provides proof beyond a reasonable doubt that QAnon is real.	A list of exhibits detailing evidence of Q	Twitter		7/7/2018	Jason Wright - @jasonawright7	https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1015666794986594304.html
What is Q	A 31 Point Introduction	Twitter		6/30/2018	Paul Serran - @paul_serran	https://mobile.twitter.com/paul_serran/status/1013195644851441664
Q Drops	A list of all drops by Q. It also follows Trump tweets. Just click “POTUS On” to read the tweets, along with any Q drops.	Webpage				https://qmap.pub/
Who is QAnon? An Introduction to the QAnon Phenomenon #QAnon #GreatAwakening	Q Tutorial	Webpage		7/11/2018	Neon Revolt	https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/07/11/who-is-qanon-an-introduction-to-the-qanon-phenomenon-qanon-greatawakening/
WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history	Q Tutorial	Webpage		7/11/2018	Martin Geddes	https://medium.com/@martingeddes/wwg1wga-the-greatest-communications-event-in-history-698ba926df64

Today, I met some friends from high school (many years ago) for breakfast. I had a one-on-one conversation with one person that led to me trying to explain Q. My classmate was very receptive, is mostly a conservative, and seemed to absorb the things mentioned. Unfortunately, we did not have enough time and I promised to email some links to expand on what was related.

While resources like this thread, the oracle, and the Lexicon are awesome resources, I looking for something I would call "Q Boot Camp" ie maybe 3 or 4 hours worth of videos that explains the arch of the story. Once my classmates understand the underlying concepts, they would be prepared to take on a broader scope such as this thread.

I tried a google search on the search terms "Q anon boot camp" hoping someone like Praying Medic would pop up. Instead, I found what I should have expected from Google, NBC, HuffPost and the like, claims of anti-semitism and other racial accusations. I think a well-prepared and maintain resource like a Q tutorial would be a valuable resource. Appreciate recommendations. Thanks in advance.

498 posted on 12/19/2018 6:06:21 PM PST by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)

To: smileyface; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; ...

CORRECTION!!!

I REPORTED EARLIER THAT MY DARLIN’ HAD HEARD THAT LYNCH HAD STATED THAT OBAMA HAD TOLD THE FBI TO BACK OFF ON INVESTIGATING HILLARY.

WHAT DARLIN’ HAD HEARD, WAS AN ANALYSIS OF THE COMEY TRANSCRIPTS. THE WORDING COMES CLOSE TO WHAT WAS REPORTED, AND I SEE HOW HE COULD HAVE CONFLATED IT, ESPECIALLY IN THE YOO INTERVIEW BELOW, BUT:

MY REPORTING IS IN ERROR.

I APOLOGIZE.

FOLLOWING IS A TRANSCRIPT I SOUGHT TO MAKE OF THE RELEVANT PARTS OF THE PROGRAM MY DARLIN’ WAS WATCHING, SO YOU MAY DECIDE FOR YOURSELF WHAT MIGHT ACTUALLY BE AT PLAY HERE:

[It’s actually very interesting in its own right! - imho]

From the America’s Newsroom Dec 19, 2018 - Around 11:00 AM ET

Early into the show, Bill Hemmer plays a clip of Andy Biggs for Ken Starr. Biggs had been talking about Comey earlier in the day. Biggs characterized how Comey handled the Clinton matter:

Andy’s quote played:
“He (Comey) basically threw Loretta Lynch out of the decision making process. He called them the morning of the news conference. That’s when he let them know he was going to go forward with the news conference announcing the exoneration of Hillary Clinton. So that’s not a coincidence.”

Bill Hammer:
“So that’s not a coincidence. Put this together for us.

Ken Starr:
It is not a coincidence that he decided in light of all that had happened with Loretta Lynch conduct and so forth that he had to take charge. It was an Alexander Haig moment for him, that “I’m in charge here” and so now I’m going to announce the ultimate disposition of a very important matter of importance really to the American People and the Rule of Law. So again, it was an arrogation of power on his part.

Bill:
What do you think they learned from Loretta Lynch then?

Ken:
I think she will probably stay with the story we have heard thus far, which is this was really - talk about taking advantage - this was Bill Clinton taking advantage of Loretta Lynch. It was almost in a figurative sense, an ambush.

Bill: By boarding the plane in Arizona and talking to her?

Ken: Exactly. The former President should never should have done that. I was very pleased when these reports came out to see that one of the senior staffers for the Attorney General tried to break it up, because that person knew this is utterly inappropriate.

Now, they say they “oh we’re talking about grandchildren and everything under the sun.” But the appearance of that, especially since it was an unplanned, unscheduled meeting, and for the President, for Bill Clinton, to thrust himself on the Attorney General, put the Attorney General in a very awkward position.

So I’m very…. I was chief of staff to the Attorney General under Reagan Administration… I’m very sympathetic though to the Attorney General’s position. And so if she stays with her story, then it will prove to be essentially an inconsequential. But the appearance is absolutely horrible.

Bill: We’ll see what comes of that….
SNIP

The headline text at the bottom of the picture during this Starr interview says, “FMR AG Loretta Lynch facing Questions About Clinton Email and Trump/Russia Investigations.”… “Comey says Lynch Sought to Influence FBI Probe into Clinton’s Emails.”

Midway through the show, Bret Baier was on, and Bill was asking him what he thought of the Ken Starr interview. He said that basically according to that interview the blame should be on Bill Clinton, not Lynch. Bill also points out to Brett that Comey has come out and is casting blame in a number of different directions - anyone but the FBI.

Brett acknowledge that Comey has been quite vocal. Bill played the Biggs quote.

Brett’s comment has to do with the denial of Lynch’s conversation encompassing anything outside of grandchildren and innocent things. But he pointed out that there are timing questions which could be asked of her.

Bill asked Brett about Starr’s use of the word “Ambush,” and do you think that after the close of business today the House investigators will get some answers? A report? Bill guesses, “no.”

Brett said that it had been a “not fulfilling” process, probably will be a report. However there are questions about how much coverage the report and findings might get. “I don’t think they are getting a Smoking Gun.”

At about 15 minutes from the end of the show, there was a segment set up with referring to the transcripts of Comey’s closed door interview.

The guest is John Yoo, the former Deputy Assistant to US Attorney General.

Fox gal (don’t know her name)
“A good portion of Monday’s 5 hour grilling included Congressman Trey Gowdy of South Carolina. He tried to connect the dots between the former President Obama, his knowledge of any possible national security breach by Hillary Clinton as then Secretary of State. And here’s the key: whether or not the FBI actually kept the former President abreast of any investigations they had going on at the time. What is your take on that and the President’s knowledge?

Yoo:
It’s a good question and it’s a really interesting part of the Comey transcript, which hasn’t been covered that much by the media.

Congressman Gowdy really I think, got into the nitty gritty of why did President Obama go on national tv and declare that Hillary Clinton had not violated national security laws by keeping classified information easily hacked server, before any briefings by the FBI.

Why did Comey authorize the interview of Michael Flynn and try to encourage there to be no lawyers and try to make it sound as though it wasn’t even an interview, and at the same time, knowing that when the FBI interviewed Hillary Clinton about her emails and [inaudible] they allowed even actual potential witnesses to that possible breaking of the law to serve as her lawyers, to set up a heavily lawyered up setting, and as you said, very favorable treatment compared to Michael Flynn.

Fox Gal:
I want to talk more about that 16 minute interview - that was in 2015, and with regard to the former President’s knowledge of the investigation, Gowdy asked Comey about that interview, in which Obama said that former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, merely and this is a quote “made a mistake and didn’t mean any harm in the leak of her emails.”

Gowdy then asked, “did you address that then with him personally?” Comey said he did not. Your take.

Yoo:
Well, first one of the interesting things is yes, President Obama went on the air, he is the President, he is the chief law enforcement officer for the nation, and declared Hillary Clinton essentially innocent before investigations had been concluded.

Second, where did President Obama get that information from? So Congressman Gowdy and some of his other colleagues were pressing on Loretta Lynch or other Justice Dept officials involved in somehow getting word to the President about it

Third, Congressman Gowdy reminded anyone who is reading the transcript that President Obama had actually been sending emails back and forth with Hillary Clinton on their private email accounts, which would suggest that he knew already that there had been some kind of open and unclassified server available to Hillary Clinton that might have had classified information on it.

Fox Gal:

She played a clip from Andy Biggs about the breaches of protocol Comey made wrt the interview of Flynn. JC admits FISA warrants are being issued. Biggs states they are trying too follow the rule of law and Comey is pushing back.

Fox Gal says,
“Pushing back. “ Why is Comey pushing back on not following protocol when he admits he broke protocol by not clearing the Flynn interview with the White House before sending agents in personally?

Yoo:

The interesting thing about the transcripts is that they show that the Flynn interview and the way the FBI went about it, making him think it wasn’t a criminal investigation, and encouraging him not to have any lawyers present, and as Mr. Comey said, getting away with evading the normal protocols for the FBI sending people to interview at the White House. That was actually the end of a train of a long series of decisions, and what Congressman Gowdy was trying to get at was “when did you decide to conduct an investigation of an ongoing Presidential campaign? That used to be off limits for the FBI. That is a lesson you should have learned during the Nixon and Water Gate controversy.

The headline text at the bottom of the screen during much of Yoo’s interview stated:

“GOP Lawmakers Question Comey about FBI Protocol and Hillary Clinton Email Investigation”

America’s Newsroom 12/19/18 [FULL] | Breaking Fox News December 19, 2018 1083
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zwx-Ca9EkQ

499 posted on 12/19/2018 6:06:25 PM PST by TEXOKIE

Looking for lawfags to answer a question.

If the EO for military tribunals doesn’t take effect until Jan 1, can it be used to proceed against anyone arrested between now and then?

Thanks in advance.

500 posted on 12/19/2018 6:07:15 PM PST by Larry - Moe and Curly (Loose lips sink ships.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794