Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster
1. What does "nukka" mean?
2. What does "House >>> Senate" mean?

I would interpret that as the House is greater, greater, greater than the Senate.

Regardless, I'll stand by my claim that the Senate won't effectively take up the work that Nunes and a few others were doing in the House.

The Intel Committee is, as stated above, deeply corrupt. The Judiciary committee -- well let's just think back to the horrible Kavanaugh hearings, you can't possibly expect that crew to bring down the Deep State.

Grassley seems like a good man, but lacks the killer instinct to bring anyone down.

And, now that you've brought it up, weren't we supposed to "trust Sessions"? How's that workin' out for ya?

I'm not providing "disinformation", which is actually an amusing claim for you to make. And I'm certainly not pushing anyone to be demoralized.

Trump has done great things for America in his first two years, and hopefully he is able to do more in the next two.

But there is no reason to refuse to look critically at where we are.

Trump is going into 2019 with a much tougher environment than he started with in 2017. The tough d interesting questions are can he avoid impreachment and indictment and make progress on his agenda. And what's his best plan to do that?

Of course the 40,000 indictments could be unsealed any day now. I notice a lot of FreeQs have now fixated on early 2019.

My end of year Q tally looks pretty good. Skepticism won in 2018. That doesn't mean it will win again in 2019, but I suspect it will.

496 posted on 12/19/2018 6:05:09 PM PST by Jack Black ("If you believe in things that you don't understand then you suffer" - "Superstition",Stevie Wonder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black
1. What does "nukka" mean?

#DontHaveTimeForCoolLessons

#YouKnowWhatItMeans

I would interpret that as the House is greater, greater, greater than the Senate.

Learn our comms.

The Judiciary committee -- well let's just think back to the horrible Kavanaugh hearings, you can't possibly expect that crew to bring down the Deep State.

House Judiciary kicked anus on the Kavanaugh hearings. Were you watching? They will not do it alone. Think Humber/Horowitz. C'mon, Jackie. Weak sauce.

And, now that you've brought it up, weren't we supposed to "trust Sessions"? How's that workin' out for ya?

Very nicely, actually. Think Huber. Jackie, you just haven't been paying attention this past year, goodman. And please spare me your usual on this matter. More weak sauce.

I'm not providing "disinformation", which is actually an amusing claim for you to make. And I'm certainly not pushing anyone to be demoralized.

This is where you're wrong, Jackie boy. Of course you are, and have been for most of the past year. From your fake chart to your constant embed false face, constantly seeking to demoralize, nay-say, and contradict Q and the truths he leads us to.

Maybe you don't realized, but I think you do.

Trump has done great things for America in his first two years, and hopefully he is able to do more in the next two.

And this may be the greatest lie of all. Knowingly disparaging Trump's Q op, his plan, and insidiously down-talking all he does, yet spouting how much you support him.

It's ridiculous on it's face. Think logically.

Trump is going into 2019 with a much tougher environment than he started with in 2017. The tough d interesting questions are can he avoid impreachment and indictment and make progress on his agenda. And what's his best plan to do that?

What's his best plan, you ask? I' I'm afraid I don't have time to go over the entire plan with you right now. I'll direct you to Q posts and the links at the top of the thread (along with the ongoing conversation among patriots here and elsewhere). Start with #1 and work your way forward. It's spelled out pretty good.

It's amazing you can even have an opinion on Q/Trump without being knowledgeable in this matter.

I guess some people just gotta be the smartest guy in the room.

Of course the 40,000 indictments could be unsealed any day now. I notice a lot of FreeQs have now fixated on early 2019.

Last number I heard was 67k or thereabouts. Please keep up, Jackie boy.

My end of year Q tally looks pretty good. Skepticism won in 2018. That doesn't mean it will win again in 2019, but I suspect it will.

If it makes you happy to think so, Jackie, then you head on. Happy is good. Christmas is right around the corner.

Cheers.

p.s. This will be my last comment to you for a while, Jackie. I prefer the company of fighters.

p.p.s. Maybe you'll find more fertile ground for your demoralization campaign on the main board. We are MAGA men here.

p.p.p.s. I would recommend that no other FReeQs engage you.

#TarBaby

*waves goodbye*

😃

Bagster


525 posted on 12/19/2018 6:40:43 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson