Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo
Title shortened
BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces the Game Changing Achievement of the Generation of Millions of Watts of Power from the Conversion of Water Fuel to a New Form of Hydrogen
Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Email More
BusinessWire · Jan. 14, 2014 | Last Updated: Jan. 14, 2014 5:01 AM ET
BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced that it has produced millions of watts of power with its breakthrough Solid Fuel-Catalyst-Induced-Hydrino-Transition (SF-CIHT) patent pending technology in its laboratories.
Using a proprietary water-based solid fuel confined by two electrodes of a SF-CIHT cell, and applying a current of 12,000 amps through the fuel, water ignites into an extraordinary flash of power. The fuel can be continuously fed into the electrodes to continuously output power. BlackLight has produced millions of watts of power in a volume that is one ten thousandths of a liter corresponding to a power density of over an astonishing 10 billion watts per liter. As a comparison, a liter of BlackLight power source can output as much power as a central power generation plant exceeding the entire power of the four former reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the site of one of the worst nuclear disasters in history.
Our safe, non-polluting power-producing system catalytically converts the hydrogen of the H2O-based solid fuel into a non-polluting product, lower-energy state hydrogen called “Hydrino”, by allowing the electrons to fall to smaller radii around the nucleus. The energy release of H2O fuel, freely available in the humidity in the air, is one hundred times that of an equivalent amount of high-octane gasoline. The power is in the form of plasma, a supersonic expanding gaseous ionized physical state of the fuel comprising essentially positive ions and free electrons that can be converted directly to electricity using highly efficient magnetohydrodynamic converters. Simply replacing the consumed H2O regenerates the fuel. Using readily-available components, BlackLight has developed a system engineering design of an electric generator that is closed except for the addition of H2O fuel and generates ten million watts of electricity, enough to power ten thousand homes. Remarkably, the device is less than a cubic foot in volume. To protect its innovations and inventions, multiple worldwide patent applications have been filed on BlackLight’s proprietary technology.
This breakthrough transformational power technology can be witnessed in a live demonstration hosted by BlackLight of on January 28th at 11 AM. Details and updates will be posted at the company website (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Those interested in attending can contact BlackLight to preregister for this limited availability event.
Applications and markets for the SF-CIHT cell extend across the global power spectrum, including thermal, stationary electrical power, motive, and defense. Given the independence from existing infrastructure, grid in the case of electricity and fuels in the case of motive power, the SF-CIHT power source is a further game changer for all forms of transportation: automobile, freight trucks, rail, marine, aviation, and aerospace in that the power density is one million times that of the engine of a Formula One racer, and ten million times that of a jet engine. The SF-CIHT cell uses cheap, abundant, nontoxic, commodity chemicals, with no apparent long-term supply issues that might preclude commercial, high volume manufacturing. The projected cost of the SF-CIHT cell is between $10 and $100/kW compared to over one hundred times that for conventional power sources of electricity.
BlackLight’s previously reported pioneering solid fuels and CIHT electrochemical cell use the same catalyst as the newly invented SF-CIHT cells, and they served as a model for Dr. Mills to invent the breakthrough plasma producing SF-CIHT cell. These background technologies have been validated by industry. BlackLight’s results of multiples of the maximum theoretical energy release for representative solid fuels was replicated at Perkin Elmer’s Field Application Laboratory at their facility using their commercial instrument. Moreover, our advanced CIHT electrochemical cell was independently replicated offsite as well.
“We at The ENSER Corporation have performed about thirty tests at our premises using BLP’s CIHT electrochemical cells of the type that were tested and reported by BLP in the Spring of 2012, and achieved the three specified goals,” said Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan, Engineering Fellow, of The ENSER Corporation. “We independently validated BlackLight’s results offsite by an unrelated highly qualified third party. We confirmed that hydrino was the product of any excess electricity observed by three analytical tests on the cell products, and determined that BlackLight Power had achieved fifty times higher power density with stabilization of the electrodes from corrosion.” Dr. Terry Copeland, who managed product development for several electrochemical and energy companies including DuPont Company and Duracell added, “Dr. James Pugh (then Director of Technology at ENSER) and Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan participated with me in the independent tests of CIHT cells at The ENSER Corporation’s Pinellas Park facility in Florida starting on November 28, 2012. We fabricated and tested CIHT cells capable of continuously producing net electrical output that confirmed the fifty-fold stable power density increase and hydrino as the product.”
The disclosure of one of BlackLight’s patent application that was recently-filed worldwide, its 10 MW electric SF-CIHT cell system engineering design and simulation, high-speed video of millions of watts of supersonically expanding SF-CIHT cell plasma, The ENSER Corporation and Dr. Terry Copeland validation reports on the prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the Perkin Elmer report on solid fuels are publicly available on BlackLight’s webpage (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Technical papers by BlackLight providing the experimental tests of plasma to electric conversion, results of excess energy production from solid fuels, results of continuous electricity production at fifty times higher power density than prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the detailed chemistry and identification of Hydrinos by ten analytical methods that laboratories can follow and replicate are given at http://www.blacklightpower.com/.
About BlackLight Power
BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy source applicable to essentially all power applications such as thermal, electrical, automotive, trucking, rail, marine, aviation, aerospace, and defense. The BlackLight Process, the power source, is the process of releasing the latent energy of the hydrogen atom by forming Hydrinos. The SF-CIHT cell was invented by Dr. Mills to release this energy directly as electricity from water as the only source of fuel.
For more information, please visit http://www.blacklightpower.com/
Glossary:
BlackLight Process: A novel chemical process invented by Dr. Mills causing the latent energy stored in the hydrogen atom to be released as a new primary energy source.
Hydrino: Hydrinos are a new form of hydrogen theoretically predicted by Dr. Mills and produced and characterized by BLP. Hydrinos are produced during the BlackLight Process as energy is released from the hydrogen atom as the electron transitions to a lower-energy state resulting in a smaller radius hydrogen atom. The identity of the dark matter of the universe as Hydrinos is supported by BlackLight’s spectroscopic and analytical results as well as astrophysical observations.
SF-CIHT Cell: Each SF-CIHT cell comprises two electrodes that confine a highly electrically conducive H2O-based solid fuel that serves as a source of reactants to form Hydrinos. A low-voltage, very high current (about one thousand times that of household currents) ignites the water to form hydrinos and cause a burst of plasma power of millions of watts that can be directly converted to electricity using proven plasma to electric power conversion technology such as a magnetohydrodynamic converter.
Magnetohydrodynamic Converter: An electrical generator that uses no moving parts. It comprises a magnet as in a conventional generator, but the conductor that moves in this case is the flowing plasma that produces a voltage at a pair of electrodes that are perpendicular to both the direction of plasma flow and the magnetic field of the magnet.
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/multimedia/home/20140114005647/en/
Contacts
BlackLight Power, Inc. Media: Beata Stepien, 609-490-1090 Ex 125 Assistant for Dr. Randell L. Mills bstepien@blacklightpower.com
Ask your flesh and blood PhD where in the PDF you link there is any mention of “hydrinos.”
hot fusion researchers have NEVER claimed they were on the brink of producing a controlled fusion.
***No, they were simply better frauds than the guys you loudly focus on. It takes superduper guvmint teat fraudsters to suck in hundreds of $billions when the payoff is 50 years away. In contrast, the guys you focus on seem to have secondhand equipment, private money, crappy demos and short runway stresses but all the while you accuse them of being masterminds who can do a Vulcan Mind Meld over 7 independent scientists or do something like a Tarallo Water Fake magic trick that requires a million gallons of water and fit it all into one 55 gallon drum.
But even if they had, their failures
***Their failures are evidence of long term, deep fraud.
DO NOT justify the con-artists plying their trade in the cold fusion business.
***Let’s see. Hundreds of $billions of public money fraudulently lost in a bandwagon ploy vs. tens of $millions of good solid scientific research in cold fusion but no bandwagon. So where do we find bandwagon boy?
Tell me what existing theory High Temperature Supercondictivity falsifies.
I’ll be glad to play fetch if you will.
How many of the 14000 times that the PF Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated are due to error? How many are due to fraud?
Keep in mind that National Instruments, the experts in Measurement Error, say that there is not a measurement error, that there is a true anomalous heat event. That’s after they went through 150 peer reviewed results. Maybe you’d like to accuse them of confirmation bias even though they have much to lose by putting their reputation on the line if this is a pseudoscience.
I’ll be glad to play fetch but you first. Answer this hypothetical:
You have a resistor to measure. Electricity in, heat out. 100Watts in, 99 Watts of heat out. You verify the measurement for 6 continuous days.
Then someone hands you a black box resistor. You measure 100Watts electrical in, 150Watts heat out. You measure the volume, and if it were to have been filled with ANY Chemical (Like gasoline), it would burn out within 2 minutes, but you’re seeing the heat out for 20,000 minutes. You look for extra wires, external sources and find none. You invite 6 other colleagues to find the evidence of fraud, to no avail.
What is the Energy Density of the first resistor compared to the second one? Come on, Mr. Advanced Science Degree. Even I can do this calculation.
You posted a link to Krivit. Not to an italian court.
Congratulations. That makes at least three frauds you know. Rossi, Mills, and some d!ck at the IRS. But I'm not signing my house over to any of them. You go right ahead.
***It’s from Krivit, a well known anti-Rossi guy.
The pdf is a court filing.
The name calling starts from the anti-LENR side.
There is no anti-LENR side, anymore than there is a conspiracy to disprove the existence of fairies. Nobody cares about it, so there isn't a side.
Well, at least I get that 1%
The 1% of non-drivel in your articles consists of the words: "a", "an", and "the."
National Instruments who reviewed 150 of them and said there is no measurement error
What happened to 14,000? Or are only 1% of them valid. NI sells instruments. That doesn't mean they're endorsing the technology. They just don't want to alienate customers. At any rate, I note it is not a technology NI is interested in investing in themselves, despite claims by LENR advocates that they were (yet more lies.)
I posted a link to a pdf. Since you can’t properly post ref’s in your own writing, I’m not surprised you don’t understand how they work.
So you think that the euphemism “Low Energy” came from the lower energy required to overcome the Coulomb Barrier? I suppose when you’re playing fetch you can give us all a link that proves this. That is, in between sucking on the guvmint teat and learning new freshman level logical fallacies you can amaze us with. I don’t believe you made it past freshman level anything, let alone post grad physics. But there is a possibility you took polysci and did very well in the classes on narcissim, Alinsky tactics, and socialism. Yup. That would make sense.
As Feynman explains it:
In the South Seas there is a cargo cult of people. During the war they saw airplanes land with lots of good materials, and they want the same thing to happen now. So they've arranged to imitate things like runways, to put fires along the sides of the runways, to make a wooden hut for a man to sit in, with two wooden pieces on his head like headphones and bars of bamboo sticking out like antennas--he's the controller--and they wait for the airplanes to land. They're doing everything right. The form is perfect. It looks exactly the way it looked before. But it doesn't work. No airplanes land. So I call these things cargo cult science, because they follow all the apparent precepts and forms of scientific investigation, but they're missing something essential, because the planes don't land.
Now go look up what I told you to look up, and don't come back until you can tell me what existing theory of physics was shaken to its knees by the discovery of High Temperature Superconductivity.
Oh...
Wait...
I'll save you the search, because no physical laws were broken by the discovery. Physicists and materials scientists had been looking for liquid nitrogen and higher temperature superconductors for years, something they would not have been wasting their time with if there were a theoretical basis that said it was impossible to do.
That does seem to be the tactic.
***And the tactic of the skeptopaths has always been to jump on the bandwagon, never discuss the science, ridicule, insult, and engage in vigilante censorship. It is the tactic of the asshole.
I especially like Tweedledumb’s approach of taking some sentence fragment out of context and responding to it as if it were a complete thought.
***Perhaps if you could post a complete thought, it would be worth responding to in the manner you prefer.
The whole website is broken, not just that link.
***I may have found it. But I’m no longer on a Windows system and my Ubuntu system can’t pull it up.
http://ebookily.org/xls/thermal-calculator-139755269.html
no independent scientist was able to confirm that the resistor was isolated from external sources of power.
***I see you’re no better at addressing a hypothetical than you are at avoiding logical fallacies. You verified 100W In. No external sources.
I see reading comprehension is a problem for you as well.
There’s no reason for me to go to an super-biased site when a FReeper tells me to fetch something. Especially someone like you.
But keep at the insults. They keep the thread open.
The word "euphemism" by the way, does not mean what you think it means, unless your opinion of LENR is the same as mine, which I doubt.
A mild or pleasant word or phrase that is used instead of one that is unpleasant or offensive. Webster, online.
Only real scientists find "cold fusion" offensive. Crackpots did not. But then, they couldn't get anyone to buy their frauds.
Only real scientists find “cold fusion” offensive.
***Wow, let’s see how many people you throw under your ignorant Luddite bus when you say such a thing. Here’s a partial list
All the scientists who generated the 14000 replications; National Instruments, who reviewed 150 peer reviewed replications; Toyota; Mitsubishi, Navy SPAWAR;
Brian Josephson, Nobel Prize Theoretical physics, Cambridge Julian Schwinger, Nobel Prize Physics, Berkeley, Purdue, deceased Dennis Bushnell, NASA chief scientist, Langley Research Center, LRC Dr. Joseph Zawodny, NASA senior research scientist Langley Research Center Dr. Michael A Nelson, NASA LENR Space Applications Lead David Wells, NASA LRC, Aeronautical engineer Gustave C. Fralick, Arthur J. Decker, and James W. Blue, NASA Lewis Research George Miley, University of Illinois, Department of Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering Dr. Mike McKubre, SRI (Stanford Research Institute), Director Energy Research Center, University of Missouri Dr. Francis Tanzella, SRI, PhD chemistry, senior electrochemist Dr. Brian Ahern , Ames National Laboratory Prof. Peter Hagelstein, Electrical Engineering, MIT Dr. James Truchard, National Instruments founder, President and CEO Edmund Storms, Los Alamos National Laboratory Dr. Mace, Los Alamos National Laboratory John Bockrus, electrochemist Texas A&M University Dr. Francesco Piantelli, University of Siena, Considered the father of modern LENR, filed original patents in 1995 for Ni/H based LENR Dr. Sergio Focardi, emeritus professor University of Bologna Dr. Giuseppe Levi , University of Bologna Dr. David Bianchini, University of Bologna Dr. Christos Stremmenos, University of Bologna, Dept of. Physical and Inorganic Chemistry, retired Francesco Celani, National Institute of Nuclear Physics (Italy’s equivalent of Los Alamos) Dr. Frank Gordon, US Navy’s Space and Naval warfare systems (SPAWAR), retired Eugene Mallove, Professor of science MIT, deceased Dr. Mastromatteo, STMicroelectronics
Now go look up what I told you to ...
Oh...
Wait...
***And then you proceed to argue against something you propped up. Yet another straw argument, and you didn’t even answer the question put to you. By your reasoning it is proper to “impute fraud” to you.
What happened to 14,000? Or are only 1% of them valid.
***All of them are valid. You expect NI to wade through 14000 replications? They waded through 150 of them. They did their homework, and you don’t do your homework. It is a replicated anomaly. Experiment trumps theory. Whine all you want, Luddite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.