[FredZarguna]

The energy density is zero, because no independent scientist was able to confirm that the resistor was isolated from external sources of power. The fact that this was deliberately done by keeping a thorough examination of the apparatus off limits means we are free -- and indeed compelled -- to impute fraud to it's "inventor."

Now go look up what I told you to look up, and don't come back until you can tell me what existing theory of physics was shaken to its knees by the discovery of High Temperature Superconductivity.

Oh...

Wait...

I'll save you the search, because no physical laws were broken by the discovery. Physicists and materials scientists had been looking for liquid nitrogen and higher temperature superconductors for years, something they would not have been wasting their time with if there were a theoretical basis that said it was impossible to do.

[Kevmo]

no independent scientist was able to confirm that the resistor was isolated from external sources of power.
***I see you’re no better at addressing a hypothetical than you are at avoiding logical fallacies. You verified 100W In. No external sources.

[Kevmo]

Now go look up what I told you to ...

Oh...

Wait...
***And then you proceed to argue against something you propped up. Yet another straw argument, and you didn’t even answer the question put to you. By your reasoning it is proper to “impute fraud” to you.