Ask your flesh and blood PhD where in the PDF you link there is any mention of “hydrinos.”
I’ll be glad to play fetch if you will.
How many of the 14000 times that the PF Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated are due to error? How many are due to fraud?
Keep in mind that National Instruments, the experts in Measurement Error, say that there is not a measurement error, that there is a true anomalous heat event. That’s after they went through 150 peer reviewed results. Maybe you’d like to accuse them of confirmation bias even though they have much to lose by putting their reputation on the line if this is a pseudoscience.