Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

So you think that the euphemism “Low Energy” came from the lower energy required to overcome the Coulomb Barrier? I suppose when you’re playing fetch you can give us all a link that proves this. That is, in between sucking on the guvmint teat and learning new freshman level logical fallacies you can amaze us with. I don’t believe you made it past freshman level anything, let alone post grad physics. But there is a possibility you took polysci and did very well in the classes on narcissim, Alinsky tactics, and socialism. Yup. That would make sense.


329 posted on 01/17/2014 5:19:52 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
No, I think the euphemism [sic] Low Energy came into effect because cold fusion was so thoroughly discredited it was time to rebrand.

The word "euphemism" by the way, does not mean what you think it means, unless your opinion of LENR is the same as mine, which I doubt.

A mild or pleasant word or phrase that is used instead of one that is unpleasant or offensive. Webster, online.

Only real scientists find "cold fusion" offensive. Crackpots did not. But then, they couldn't get anyone to buy their frauds.

336 posted on 01/17/2014 5:50:58 PM PST by FredZarguna (Das is nicht richtig nur falsch. Das ist nicht einmal falsch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
So you think that the euphemism “Low Energy” came from the lower energy required to overcome the Coulomb Barrier?

Do you think it meant low output?

343 posted on 01/17/2014 6:28:06 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson