Congratulations. That makes at least three frauds you know. Rossi, Mills, and some d!ck at the IRS. But I'm not signing my house over to any of them. You go right ahead.
***It’s from Krivit, a well known anti-Rossi guy.
The pdf is a court filing.
The name calling starts from the anti-LENR side.
There is no anti-LENR side, anymore than there is a conspiracy to disprove the existence of fairies. Nobody cares about it, so there isn't a side.
Well, at least I get that 1%
The 1% of non-drivel in your articles consists of the words: "a", "an", and "the."
National Instruments who reviewed 150 of them and said there is no measurement error
What happened to 14,000? Or are only 1% of them valid. NI sells instruments. That doesn't mean they're endorsing the technology. They just don't want to alienate customers. At any rate, I note it is not a technology NI is interested in investing in themselves, despite claims by LENR advocates that they were (yet more lies.)
What happened to 14,000? Or are only 1% of them valid.
***All of them are valid. You expect NI to wade through 14000 replications? They waded through 150 of them. They did their homework, and you don’t do your homework. It is a replicated anomaly. Experiment trumps theory. Whine all you want, Luddite.
There is no anti-LENR side,
***Ok, then perhaps we need to go back to calling them seagulls.