Posted on 12/06/2011 9:09:22 AM PST by IbJensen
I understand that the NAACP opposes voter-ID laws. Given the long history of fighting against uses of state law to deny blacks and other minorities the franchise until the Civil Rights Movement prevailed, their deep skepticism over proposed stricter enforcement of eligibility laws cant help but recall echoes of voter suppression in their communities, even if the new laws are innocent of any racial animus. We still have plenty of mistrust that will take generations to undo, especially given that we still have those with living memories of having been denied the right to vote.
Still, if the NAACP wants to make the argument against such laws, shouldnt they do it in a forum that has some jurisdiction over them?
The largest civil rights group in America, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), is petitioning the UN over what it sees as a concerted efforted to disenfranchise black and Latino voters ahead of next years presidential election.
The organisation will this week present evidence to the UN high commissioner on human rights of what it contends is a conscious attempt to block the vote on the part of state legislatures across the US. Next March the NAACP will send a delegation of legal experts to Geneva to enlist the support of the UN human rights council.
The NAACP contends that the America in the throes of a consciously conceived and orchestrated move to strip black and other ethnic minority groups of the right to vote. William Barber, a member of the associations national board, said it was the most vicious, co-ordinated and sinister attack to narrow participation in our democracy since the early 20th century.
In its report, Defending Democracy: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America, the NAACP explores the voter supression measures taking place particularly in southern and western states.
Fourteen states have passed a total of 25 measures that will unfairly restrict the right to vote, among black and Hispanic voters in particular.
None of this is particularly new. Its the same argument that the NAACP and other civil-rights groups make against voter-ID laws, and have for years. Wisconsin just passed one such law (and its neither southern or western, either), and Minnesota would have passed one by now had we elected a Republican governor in 2010. States have begun adopting these laws because of increasing instances of vote fraud, either in registration or in actual voting. Minnesota leads the nation in prosecutions at the moment for these violations, which erode the value of legitimate voting.
Why take this to the UN, though? The UN has no authority to tell states within the US to pass or not pass laws. They dont have the authority to tell the federal government in Washington to do so, either. They might be able to gin up some public-relations momentum in an attempt to embarrass the states, but its only going to impress those people who already buy into the concept that the UN has any moral authority at all especially its Human Rights Council (with whom the High Commissioner works), which spends most of its time and effort attacking Israel.
The NAACP should spend its time engaging with people who are legitimately concerned about voter fraud and the protection of the value of the franchise to all eligible citizens of the states. One concern mentioned in this petition is the difficulty in getting state-issued ID because of Jim Crow policies decades ago that kept blacks and other minorities from getting birth certificates. If this is still a widespread problem, then solve it as part of the necessary reform to secure the vote. They also complain that states dont allow felons who have completed their sentences to vote; thats another issue that can only be solved by local and state action, and not in Geneva, Switzerland.
Instead of complaining to people who have nothing to say about the law of a self-governing people, the NAACP would be better advised to start engaging with their neighbors to find ways to achieve a better result for all of the legitimate voters in their communities, and to protect the value of the votes they want to cast. A UN petition only makes it look as though theyre interested in grandstanding rather than reaching solutions, and hints that theyd be happier with the imposition of foreign diktats rather than self-governance. Thats no way to win this argument.
Everyone should have a voter ID. If some reason an idiot doesn't possess a driver's license a voter registration card suffices. This is utter bullcrap!
I wonder why an ID requirement for voting is racist?
IDs are required to receive welfare, food stamps, to register for public education, for section 8, for public housing, for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, student loans, car loans, home loans, to drive a car, and to register at my city fitness center.
Why should voting be exempt?
Nothing less than treason.
Uh....make that "among welfare cheats and illegals, in particular."
No standing no law, FTUN and the NAALCP.
I never realized that blacks in the U.S.A. were not allowed to have driver’s licenses. I just always assumed that could get a driver’s license the same as me. I have been so naive!! I’m outraged over this.
I’d like nothing better than “blue-helmet” target practice....gotta stay up on the targets!
“NAACP to petition UN to stop voter-ID legislation in states”
Most liberals that I have met are so blasted ignorant that they might actually BELIEVE that the U.N. has the power to do something about this.
(or whatever Acorn is calling itself these days.)
just wait until CAIR and Keith “X” Ellison weigh in...
then the UN will care.
Jesse Jackson admitted just a short while back that the democRat voter fraud rate was around 11%.
Well, he didn’t actually admit THAT, but he said that the “disenfranchisement” would be about 11%.
Dey cud borry they daddy card. Ooops. No daddy.
What we really need to do is sanction organizations and individuals who try to subordinate the US to the UN.
If it is racist to have to show i.d. to vote, then it is racist to have to show it to board a plane, cash a check, buy liquor, get a drivers’ license and the myriad of things that require an i.d.
Who’s going to petition the (unimportant) UN to stop NAACP/Dims from claiming hispanics and blacks are too dumb to acquire an ID to vote, when ID is required for EVERY other support/assistance/medical aspect in their lives?
The UN has no enforcement mechanism anyway.
The only thing they could do was pressure the government of the United States to use force to overturn the requirement.
At that point, it’s a “choose this day whom you will serve” moment for the LEO that shows up to do so.
HUH, they want the UN to come in and stop people from being ID’d before they vote.
This goes to show they have lost their marbles and really are desperate on the left.
How about looking into their areas which have drug problems, gang problems, unemployment, lack of education for many, failing black schools< black frigging school , imagine white schools ?that in itself is racist>
welfare, how welfare is OK to be on, crime, graffiti, race relations and racist views towards non blacks, Kids with many fathers or no fathers for some, liberals putting planned parenthood in their areas and making it easy to kill their own.
There is a whole host of issues they should be looking at not this insane crap by them.
National Association for the Advancement of COLORED People?
Hmmm... I’m “colored” - kind of a peachy tan.
I’m definitely not “uncolored”, that would be clear.
Does this mean we can’t use tombstones as ID any longer?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.