The Lord Chief Justice has clarified his controversial guidelines on burglary sentencing. That's what it says here, anyway, in the official statement. What exactly does this clarification make clear? Given the rumpus produced by his initial judgment - that first- or even second-time burglars should not be sent to prison - you might have expected Lord Woolf to be saying, "No, no - you got it all wrong. My remarks were misrepresented. I was quoted out of context." Some hokum or other that really meant, whoops, that was a gigantic mistake - I'll take it back now. Some of you...