Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pentagon Cracks Down On Big Tech’s Coziness With China
American Greatness ^ | 08/30/2025 | Paul Bradford

Posted on 08/30/2025 5:53:41 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Defense Secretary Hegseth slammed Microsoft for using Chinese engineers on Pentagon data, ending the program and warning that Big Tech’s ties to Beijing put U.S. security at risk.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced last week that the military would cease using a Microsoft program that relied on Chinese engineers. This obviously presented a major security issue, which Hegseth noted.

“If you’re thinking ‘America first’ and common sense, this doesn’t pass either of those tests,” Hegseth said of the program. “The use of Chinese nationals to service Department of Defense cloud environments? It’s over.”

He also declared that the DOD had delivered a formal letter to Microsoft, chiding the tech giant for breaching the trust of its government and for allowing such a problem to arise. The Pentagon promises to do more audits of its Microsoft-provided programs and other tech initiatives for China connections.

Microsoft is one of the worst offenders in this CCP connection. Its co-founder, Bill Gates, always finds an opportunity to praise China. In March, Gates gushed over the communist state’s tech advances and warned that any American attempts to counter Chinese growth would stifle global innovation. The tech giant has a large presence in the country, generating fears that this would allow the CCP access to our national security operations.

The “digital escorts” program that the DOD just revoked, confirmed these fears. Microsoft’s Chinese engineers handle some of the most sensitive material the Pentagon processes.

As ProPublica reported in July:

Microsoft uses the escort system to handle the government’s most sensitive information that falls below “classified.” According to the government, this “high impact level” category includes “data that involves the protection of life and financial ruin.” The “loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability” of this information “could be expected to have a severe or catastrophic adverse effect” on operations, assets, and individuals, the government has said. In the Defense Department, the data is categorized as “Impact Level” 4 and 5 and includes materials that directly support military operations.

Former CIA senior executive Harry Coker told the outlet, “If I were an operative, I would look at that as an avenue for extremely valuable access. We need to be very concerned about that.”

The ChiComs may even inspire some of Microsoft’s domestic operations. The tech giant played a critical role in setting up the censorship industrial complex that has been weaponized against conservatives in the U.S. and elsewhere. The CCP would be proud of such an endeavor.

Microsoft cultivates close ties with China because its dominance of the market makes its executives think it’s too big to punish. It’s only the operator who can serve the government’s national security needs in certain areas. Any concerns about communist subversion are ignored when it’s the only option available.

These practices likely run afoul of antitrust law, making Microsoft a prime target for a Federal Trade Commission investigation. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson has made it a priority to crack down on Big Tech malfeasance in the market. Microsoft’s actions don’t just violate free market principles—they also put our national security at risk.

The FTC announced a probe into Microsoft’s bundling practices last December. The tech company allegedly uses this strategy to make itself seem the best option for government contracting while unfairly cutting out the competition. This lack of serious competition cements Microsoft’s cavalier attitude towards China and its reluctance to change that behavior. If no other company can challenge Microsoft’s stranglehold, there’s little motivation to correct the tech giant’s errors.

The administration wants to mandate a simple standard for companies it does business with: put America first. Microsoft and other tech giants fail this basic criterion. Previous administrations allowed them to skate by due to their monopolies. It’s time to change that for the sake of the national interest. We can’t allow China to further undermine our defense capabilities because we’re afraid of upsetting Bill Gates.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; China; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; defense; microsoft; technology

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 08/30/2025 5:53:41 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

While this is extremely wise - there is also some irony: How many computer chips/processors/electronic components within nearly every computer/device/system from aviation to tanks and drones, are sourced from China/Taiwan/Hong Kong? The sad truth is - China probably has a back door into much of our military stuff.


2 posted on 08/30/2025 5:56:53 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists-Satanists: redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

RE: How many computer chips/processors/electronic components within nearly every computer/device/system from aviation to tanks and drones, are sourced from China/Taiwan/Hong Kong?

The numbers are sobering. According to a 2024 report by Govini, a data analytics firm contracted by the Pentagon:

FOR CHINA:

• Over 40% of semiconductors sustaining U.S. weapons systems and infrastructure are sourced from China

• 6,500+ Chinese-supplied chips are used in the Ford-class aircraft carriers alone

• Between 2014 and 2022, U.S. dependence on Chinese electronics increased by 600%

• The number of Chinese suppliers in the U.S. defense-industrial base quadrupled from 2005 to 2020

How about Taiwan?

Taiwan produces over 65% of global semiconductors, and more than 90% of the most advanced ones. A blockade or invasion of Taiwan would instantly disrupt the supply of chips critical to U.S. defense systems.

Hong Kong is less central in direct manufacturing but often serves as a transshipment hub and financial conduit for Chinese tech firms. Its role is more indirect but still part of the broader supply chain.

This level of dependency poses serious risks:
• Supply chain vulnerability in times of geopolitical tension
• Espionage and sabotage potential through embedded components
• Leverage for economic coercion, should China choose to restrict exports

The U.S. is attempting to counter this through initiatives like the CHIPS Act, which allocates $39 billion for domestic semiconductor manufacturing and $13 billion for R&D—but rebuilding a resilient supply chain will take years.

But it’s not going to happen quickly. We certainly won’t be able to totally in-source everything by the time Trump leaves office.

This is the result of nearly 40 years of outsourcing these vital industries to that part of the world.


3 posted on 08/30/2025 6:07:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bookmark


4 posted on 08/30/2025 6:11:41 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Until MSFT employees cool their heels in Supermax prisons, this will continue.


5 posted on 08/30/2025 6:22:29 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Companies cannot legally discriminate based on race or national origin.

If the information was sensitive, it should have been classified.

The federal government determines who has clearances.


6 posted on 08/30/2025 6:35:36 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

I’m guessing Trump’s going to be using Intel to ‘take back chip making’.... back to the US ...


7 posted on 08/30/2025 7:05:51 PM PDT by GOPJ (<I><B><big><center> Chicago's mayor? Is he working with the cartels?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And is a direct violation of military procurement LAW. Any idea when exemptions were opened up that allows this? Had to have been at some point quite a while ago.


8 posted on 08/30/2025 7:14:32 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists-Satanists: redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Maybe... but are all of Intel’s processors and other chips produced OUTSIDE of China? Or is that a work “in progress”?

In all honesty - BOTH political parties are to blame...


9 posted on 08/30/2025 7:15:55 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists-Satanists: redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Navidia designs here and produces ‘there’... I believe Intel makes their chips here.


10 posted on 08/30/2025 7:23:47 PM PDT by GOPJ (<I><B><big><center> Chicago's mayor? Is he working with the cartels?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Someone suggested earlier today that Chinese nationals not be allowed to attend grad school.

[At least not in electrical engineering and biochemistry in my opinion]


11 posted on 08/30/2025 7:50:09 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“ Someone suggested earlier today that Chinese nationals not be allowed to attend grad school.”

They shouldn’t be allowed here at all.

L


12 posted on 08/30/2025 7:52:46 PM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I used to work at DISA. The Defense Information Systems Agency.
They are the Data Center for the Military.
A few years ago, we stated to lose "customers" to Microsoft Data centers and Amazon Cloud services.
I knew this was going to happen. I was subjected to vigorous background checks all the time.
I knew someone that worked at a Microsoft center and he said they aren't as Security conscious but they handled the same sensitive data.
13 posted on 08/31/2025 6:10:43 AM PDT by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson