Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Says He Will Sign Executive Order Mandating Voter I.D.
The New York Times ^ | Aug. 31, 2025Updated 12:07 p.m. ET | Yan Zhuang

Posted on 08/31/2025 11:02:12 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

He also wants to restrict mail-in voting and allow only paper ballots. The Constitution doesn’t give the president explicit authority over election law.

President Trump said late Saturday that he would issue an executive order to require voter identification for all U.S. elections, a continuation of his efforts to overhaul the nation’s election laws, which he has long attacked and falsely blamed for his 2020 election loss.

In a post on Truth Social, Mr. Trump said, “Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS! I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!!” He did not provide further details about the order.

He also reiterated his intention to restrict mail-in voting except for those who are very ill or serving far away in the military, as well as his opposition to voting machines.

The announcement signals Mr. Trump’s latest effort to influence election laws using an executive order, something that he has dubious authority to do. The Constitution gives the president no explicit authority to regulate elections. Rather, it gives states the power to decide the rules of elections, oversee voting and try to prevent fraud. It gives Congress the ability to override state laws on voting. Any executive order from the president regarding elections is likely to see immediate legal challenges.

Mr. Trump and his allies have started a wide-ranging effort to gain any advance they can ahead of midterm elections, which are set for November 2026.

Earlier this month, Mr. Trump said that a team of lawyers were preparing an executive order to end all mail-in ballots and wrote on social media that the executive...


(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: executiveorder; fighttruth; goodluck; jdvancenow; kingdecree; rulebyorder; voterid; votetruth

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 08/31/2025 11:02:12 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s hysterical when worthless lefties worry about what is and isn’t in the constitution.


2 posted on 08/31/2025 11:04:06 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (Wake up, smell the cat food in your bank account. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It this true?

Start with that the source is The New York Times. Presumptively false.

Need confirmation from a reliable source.


3 posted on 08/31/2025 11:04:35 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
President Trump said late Saturday that he would issue an executive order to require voter identification for all U.S. elections, a continuation of his efforts to overhaul the nation’s election laws, which he has long attacked and falsely blamed for his 2020 election loss.

This looks like Operation Mockingbird's tell.

4 posted on 08/31/2025 11:05:51 AM PDT by Captain Walker ("Justice exalteth a nation: but sin maketh nations miserable." – Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

he Constitution doesn’t give the president explicit authority over election law

~~~

“explicit”

That word attracted my attention.

That sounds like legal weasel-speak for otherwise saying that the constitution doesn’t directly restrict it.

I will admit, I’ve always been against governing (or substituting for legislating) by executive fiat.
However, the democrats love to do it, so the precedent is more than set. Make them sue against ever executive order. The activist judges might win, but it’s still a good-for-goose-good-for-gander situation.


5 posted on 08/31/2025 11:05:59 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

just one more thing PDJT is trying to accomplish on his own when the truth is that many of the things really should be done by Congress

I THINK that PDJT may be able to require ID to insure the integrity of the vote for for federal elections.
But maybe not for elections for state offices?

Just guessing


6 posted on 08/31/2025 11:07:29 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Doing it wayyyy before the 2026 elections means there is plenty of time to get it all worked out in the courts.

If you wait until summer of 2026 to do something like this, they will get their injunctions and stays in place in order to keep it from taking effect in November.


7 posted on 08/31/2025 11:10:17 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“””President Trump said late Saturday that he would issue an executive order to require voter identification for all U.S. elections””””


Voter ID has major support (90%+) from Republican voters and maybe 50/50 support from Independent Voters. In other words it is an 80/20 issue.

Trump is doing the typical Trump tango where he forces the Democrats to defend No Voter ID while 80% of the voters want Voter ID.


8 posted on 08/31/2025 11:10:17 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Trump is flooding the zone, just like they flooded him with lawfare.

He’s got them playing wack-a-mole so fast their heads are spinning.


9 posted on 08/31/2025 11:11:12 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of racism, anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Blue states wanting to retain mail in voting will face the prospect of significant costs to run a complicated election, partly for fed offices and partly for state offices. In addition the burdens to local clerks brings them to the breaking point of unfunded mandates


10 posted on 08/31/2025 11:11:31 AM PDT by C210N (Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It is a crime that we need a friggin I.D. for everything else we do in life but it isn’t important enough to make meatballs prove who the hell they are before we allow them to vote? Regardless of what the Party of Death, Destruction and Dementia says, elections are kind of important. Having an I.D. to vote is more important than needing a driver’s license to drive.


11 posted on 08/31/2025 11:14:52 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Is this damn country so hard up for Judges that we have to hire Sparkle Sookananan from Trinidad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

At most mail in ballots should be restricted to the elderly and disabled. And even then it should be strictly controlled.


12 posted on 08/31/2025 11:15:31 AM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This will be stopped, and rightly so, by a court. It is the job of Congress that needs to get off its collective rear-end and pass the requisite legislation.


13 posted on 08/31/2025 11:16:07 AM PDT by Fai Mao (I used to care, but things have changed ~ Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

understood, so maybe some states will reinstitute voter ID for both fed AND state offices

hopefully so


14 posted on 08/31/2025 11:17:31 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

indeed

PDJT has learned how seriously dangerous the far left is


15 posted on 08/31/2025 11:18:22 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: z3n

yes, there is indeed time to work through some of these executive mandates

I sure hope PDJT has enough good lawyers to handle things well


16 posted on 08/31/2025 11:19:22 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Actually, the Constitution does not give the President any role in governing elections. Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 states:

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing [sic] Senators.

So sad as I am to point this out, President Trump is exceeding his authority by attempting to specify the manner of holding elections unless there is a law passed by Congress that delegates this authority to presidents.

17 posted on 08/31/2025 11:20:31 AM PDT by Avalon Memories (Obama & Biden Inc. really did provide opportunities for Trump to be murdered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Congress has to get involved. Between the filibuster and GOP squishes it will be a tough road.

I’d say allow early voting on the Saturday just before the election. One day only. Lighten up the bottleneck on Tuesday.


18 posted on 08/31/2025 11:22:19 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

the GOP squishes or turncoats ARE the problem, the reason why PDJT pretty much realizes he has to go it alone

alas.


19 posted on 08/31/2025 11:23:29 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Everyone should have to prove Citizenship when they register. And that has nothing to do with States regulating their elections...dates, time & place.


20 posted on 08/31/2025 11:27:28 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson