Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,929
32%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 32%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: vanordenvperry

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • WSJ: Supreme Ending - Good news on copyrights, more confusion on religion.

    06/28/2005 4:59:55 AM PDT · by OESY · 6 replies · 520+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | June 28, 2005 | Editorial
    ...In van Orden v. Perry, the Court allowed a six-foot granite monument to the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the Texas capitol. But in McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, it decided that a display of framed copies of the Ten Commandments inside two Kentucky courthouses was going too far. ...Reading through the majority opinions, it seems that the difference boils down to such "context" dependent issues as the fact that the granite monument was old -- it had been there since 1961 -- while the Kentucky commandments were of newer vintage and therefore possibly a product of the...
  • Antonin Scalia v. Thomas Jefferson

    03/13/2005 3:53:28 PM PST · by LyricalReckoner · 40 replies · 701+ views
    In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote that government derives its authority from the consent of the governed. Scalia doesn’t see it that way. In a speech in 2002, he reminded his audience what it says in the Bible: the government is ordained by God. During arguments in [i]Van Orden v. Perry,[/i] Scalia said Jefferson was wrong. Our government doesn’t derive its authority from the consent of the governed. It “derives its authority from God.” And, he insisted, it’s a fact that “the foundation of our laws is God.” Read all about it: http://www.misterthorne.org/ESSAYS/scalia_v_jefferson.htm Enjoy!