Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $59,432
73%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 73%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: santer

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Dear Ben Santer

    05/28/2010 6:19:26 AM PDT · by mattstat · 1 replies · 169+ views
    Dear Ben, How was your trip to D.C.? Were you nervous when you testified before Congress about how ridiculous climate science in the public has become? I read that you have been receiving threats to your family. What a world. Obviously, a few climate skeptics---and a few non-skeptics, too---have gone over the edge and slipped into lunacy. I think that anybody who has written you a threatening letter ought to be tracked down and slapped silly. I don't mean that metaphorically. If I could, I'd take turns sitting on your front porch with a shotgun loaded with buckshot. And if...
  • What Scientists Really Think About Global Warming: The answers won't entirely please either side.

    12/19/2009 4:49:08 PM PST · by neverdem · 14 replies · 1,092+ views
    Forbes.com ^ | 12.19.09 | S. Robert Lichter
    These are hard times for climate scientists who want government action on global warming. Not only has the Copenhagen summit largely produced discord, but an embarrassing public release of private e-mails exposed attempts by a group of climate scientists to hide scientific evidence that didn't conform to their beliefs or pronouncements. As CBS News put it, the scandal, called "Climategate," is "casting doubts on the very science on which this summit is based." In a widely noted Washington Post column, former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin argued, "the documents show that there was no real consensus" among climate scientists. And...
  • A Climatology Conspiracy? (The plot thickens!)

    12/19/2009 11:22:49 PM PST · by neverdem · 20 replies · 1,396+ views
    American Thinker ^ | December 20, 2009 | David H. Douglass and John R. Christy
    The CRU emails have revealed how the normal conventions of the peer review process appear to have been compromised by a team* of global warming scientists, with the willing cooperation of the editor of the International Journal of Climatology (IJC), Glenn McGregor. The team spent nearly a year preparing and publishing a paper that attempted to rebut a previously published paper in IJC by Douglass, Christy, Pearson and Singer (DCPS). The DCPS paper, reviewed and accepted in the traditional manner, had shown that the IPCC models that predicted significant "global warming" in fact largely disagreed with the observational data. We...
  • It Didn't Start With Climategate (IPPC peer reviewed docs changed after peer review)

    01/02/2010 8:52:47 AM PST · by Titus-Maximus · 33 replies · 1,474+ views
    Powerline ^ | 1/1/10 | Powerline
    The whistleblower at the University of East Anglia who leaked emails and other documents that reveal the fraud that is being perpetrated by the world's leading global warming alarmists did us all a great service. But it is important to realize that the deception didn't just begin: rather, the global warming hysteria movement has been shot through with fraud from the start. The most important document in the history of the anthropogenic global warming movement was the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Second Assessment Report, which was published under the auspices of the United Nations in 1996. This report was...
  • CLIMATE: Scientists return fire at skeptics in 'destroyed data' dispute

    12/02/2009 11:54:04 AM PST · by Ultra Sonic 007 · 45 replies · 2,631+ views
    E&E Publishing ^ | 10/14/09 | Robin Bravender
    Climate scientists are refuting claims that raw data used in critical climate change reports has been destroyed, rendering the reports and policies based on those reports unreliable. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-market advocacy group, is arguing that U.S. EPA's climate policies rely on raw data that have been destroyed and are therefore unreliable. The nonprofit group -- a staunch critic of U.S. EPA's efforts to regulate greenhouse gases -- petitioned the agency last week to reopen the public comment period on its proposed "endangerment finding" because the data set had been lost (E&ENews PM, Oct. 9). But climate scientists...