Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $6,279
7%  
Woo hoo!! And our first 7% is in!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: richardgoldschmidt

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Tweaking the Genetic Code: Debunking Attempts to Engineer Evolution

    12/01/2009 9:22:15 AM PST · by GodGunsGuts · 26 replies · 1,287+ views
    ACTS & FACTS ^ | December 2009 | Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D.
    A new concept making its way through the scientific community holds that just a few key changes in the right genes will result in a whole new life form as different from its progenitor as a bird is from a lizard![1] This idea is being applied to a number of key problems in the evolutionary model, one of which is the lack of transitional forms in both the fossil record and the living (extant) record. The new concept supposedly adds support to the "punctuated equilibrium" model proposed by the late Harvard paleontologist Stephen J. Gould. Dr. Gould derived his ideas...
  • Zoogenesis: a theory of desperation (Evo admitted creationists explain fossil gaps better)

    04/06/2009 11:48:57 AM PDT · by GodGunsGuts · 106 replies · 1,363+ views
    Journal of Creation ^ | Russell Grigg
    Zoogenesis—a theory of desperation by Russell Grigg Austin H. Clark (1880–1954) was an American evolutionary zoologist who wrote 630 articles and books in six languages.1 Not many people have heard of him today, because he had a major problem with Darwinism, and to get around this he proposed a new theory, which challenged the evolutionary orthodoxy of his contemporaries. The problem In an extraordinary book, The New Evolution: Zoogenesis,2 Clark showed that there was no evidence that any major type of plant or animal had evolved from or into any other type. He wrote, ‘When we examine a series of...
  • Darwin's Evolutionary Tree 'Annihilated'

    02/03/2009 9:43:06 AM PST · by GodGunsGuts · 174 replies · 2,501+ views
    ICR ^ | February 3, 2009 | Brian Thoma, M.S.
    Darwin's Evolutionary Tree 'Annihilated' by Brian Thomas, M.S.* In 1837, Charles Darwin drew his first “evolutionary tree” in his “B” notebook, with the words “I think” scrawled above it, to illustrate his idea that all of today’s species arose from a single common ancestor. But the poor fit of gene sequence data is forcing scientists to abandon the tree.1 “Biologists need to depart from the preconceived notion that all genomes are related by a single bifurcating tree,”2 making way for a new paradigm of origins. A non-Darwinian evolutionary view has been offered, but this proposition is actually just the old...