Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $13,078
16%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 16%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: maxboot

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Giving Thanks to the Troops

    11/26/2008 10:31:26 AM PST · by Jbny · 7 replies · 243+ views
    Commentary Magazine ^ | November 26, 2008 | Max Boot
    Thanksgiving is a time to celebrate with family-and a time to remember those who won’t have that privilege. I am thinking primarily of the 279,825 American service personnel who were, according to official Department of Defense statistics, deployed abroad as of June 30, 2008. Some of them are able to have their families with them — for instance those stationed in Germany. But most are on “unaccompanied” tours, whether in combat zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan, or even in peaceful countries such as South Korea and Japan. (And even many of the troops nominally stationed in Germany are actually...
  • McCain advisors: No to Syria talks, little interest in ME peace process [BO-Blair US envoy?]

    09/23/2008 4:26:57 PM PDT · by SJackson · 7 replies · 166+ views
    Jewish Journal ^ | 9-23-08 | Ron Kampeas
    LEESBURG, Va. (JTA)—A McCain administration would discourage Israeli-Syrian peace talks and refrain from actively engaging in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. That was the message delivered over the weekend by two McCain advisers—Max Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, and Richard Williamson, the Bush administration’s special envoy to Sudan—during a retreat hosted by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy at the Lansdowne Resort in rural Virginia. One of Barack Obama’s representatives—Richard Danzig, a Clinton administration Navy secretary—said the Democratic presidential candidate would take the opposite approach on both issues. In an interview with the Atlantic magazine...
  • Behind Maliki's Games

    07/22/2008 10:09:28 PM PDT · by flyfree · 12 replies · 102+ views
    Washington Post ^ | July 23, 2008 | Max Boot
    There is some irony in the fact that Democrats, after years of deriding Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki as a hopeless bungler and conniving Shiite sectarian, are now treating as sacrosanct his suggestion that Iraq will be ready to assume responsibility for its own security by 2010. Naturally this is because his position seems to support that of Barack Obama. A little skepticism is in order here. The prime minister has political motives for what he's saying -- whatever that is. An anonymous Iraqi official told the state-owned Al-Sabah newspaper, "Maliki thinks that Obama is most likely to win in...
  • What's Missing Here?

    04/11/2008 5:10:36 AM PDT · by nuconvert · 2 replies · 25+ views
    Commentary ^ | Max Boot
    What's Missing Here? Max Boot One of the familiar tropes of the anti-war caucus is that Iraq had no links to terrorism prior to the American invasion but now it has become a breeding ground of terrorists who will destabilize other countries. The first part of the argument—the claim that Saddam-era Iraq was not linked to terrorism—should have been demolished by the recent Iraq Perspectives Project report. (Unfortunately, its findings were generally misreported by the MSM.) The second part of the argument—the claim that Iraq is exporting terrorism—has now come under serious assault from, of all people, the French. In...
  • Alarm over Iran helps Bush

    03/07/2007 6:31:06 PM PST · by nuconvert · 16 replies · 690+ views
    LA Times ^ | March 7, 2007 | Max Boot
    Alarm over Iran helps Bush The U.S. has plenty of reasons to strike, but the administration pushes diplomacy. March 7, 2007 IS THAT trigger-happy gunslinger in the White House about to take aim at Iran? You would think so if you read the Guardian newspaper in Britain, which has written, "Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites are well advanced." Not to be outdone, the competing Sunday Times has reported, based on a "source with close ties to British intelligence," that "up to five [U.S.] generals and admirals are willing to resign rather than approve what they consider would...
  • Kristof Gets It Wrong (Again)

    08/13/2007 12:34:24 PM PDT · by Contentions · 1 replies · 221+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.13.2007 | Max Boot
    The opinion writers for the New York Times do not seem to have gotten the news that the troop surge is working. (For the latest indication, see this USA Today story reporting that “the number of truck bombs and other large al-Qaeda-style attacks in Iraq have declined nearly 50 percent since the United States started increasing troop levels in Iraq about six months ago.”) Columnist Nicholas Kristof writes today that “staggering on” in Iraq will only delay “the inevitable”—that is, our defeat. Oddly enough he buttresses this argument with an analogy to the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. He argues that...
  • Max Boot Interview (VIDEO!)

    08/13/2007 9:55:24 AM PDT · by Contentions · 132+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.13.2007 | Max Boot
    Last week we sat down for an interview with Max Boot, a regular contributor to this blog and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Boot talks about “How Not to Get Out of Iraq” (his article in the September issue of COMMENTARY), General Petraeus’s September report, the war in Iraq, and more. Follow the Link: http://www.commentarymagazine.com/contentions/index.php/peach/790
  • Calm Kadhimiya

    08/10/2007 10:21:25 AM PDT · by Contentions · 2 replies · 186+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.10.2007 | Max Boot
    If you want an illustration of the old adage that “good news is no news,” simply try to find stories about the pilgrimage by tens of thousands of Shiites to the Kadhimiya shrine in northwest Baghdad on Thursday. There were a few accounts—see, for instance, this New York Times article and this from the Los Angeles Times—but they were buried deep inside the newspapers. What happened on Thursday was pretty remarkable: nothing. At least nothing terribly violent. Last year at least twenty pilgrims were killed by sniper and mortar attacks. In 2005, 1,000 pilgrims died on a bridge after rumors...
  • Dispatch from Task Force Justice

    08/08/2007 2:01:39 PM PDT · by Contentions · 129+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.8.2007 | Max Boot
    I visited Forward Operating Base Justice, located in the northwest Baghdad neighborhood of Khadamiyah, in April. Its commander is Lieutenant Colonel Steven Miska. I recently asked him for an update on developments in his AOR (Area of Responsibility) that I could share with contentions readers. Here is his response:
  • Rational Optimism on Iraq

    08/07/2007 1:24:04 PM PDT · by Contentions · 9 replies · 494+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.7.2007 | Max Boot
    The evidence of gains being made on the ground in Iraq continues to pile up. See, for instance, this article by Robert Burns, the Associated Press’s veteran military writer. Burns has just returned from his 18th trip to Iraq to report: “The new U.S. military strategy in Iraq, unveiled six months ago to little acclaim, is working.” Or this new report by Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He traveled to Iraq with Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution recently, and while his findings are not quite as positive as theirs, he nevertheless...
  • We’re All Neocons Now

    08/07/2007 10:24:22 AM PDT · by Contentions · 49 replies · 1,029+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.7.2007 | Max Boot
    Last Friday, RealClearPolitics ran in its lead feature spot an essay by Gregory Scoblete, a free-lance writer in New Jersey. The essay had the headline “The GOP, Ron Paul & Non-Interventionism,” and was subsequently commented upon by, among others, guest-blogger Stephen Bainbridge on Andrew Sullivan’s blog. Scoblete’s premise is that, just as Barry Goldwater’s failed campaign for president led the Republican party to embrace a limited-government philosophy, so too Ron Paul’s presidential campaign today, doomed though it is, will cause the GOP to embrace his philosophy of “non-interventionism.” Scoblete goes on at great lengths to “distinguish non-interventionism from isolationism.” He...
  • The World Is Watching

    08/06/2007 9:02:21 AM PDT · by Contentions · 5 replies · 575+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.6.2007 | Max Boot
    There is a fascinating tidbit buried deep in this Washington Post story on America’s troubled relations with Pakistan’s military dictator Pervez Musharraf. After explaining why U.S. officials are bothered by Musharraf’s lackadaisical response to the Islamist extremists who have found a refuge in Pakistan’s tribal areas, Post reporters Karen DeYoung and Joby Warrick write: "Musharraf also had a complaint of his own: His leverage over the tribal militants had slipped because of the U.S.-led war in Iraq. Foreign fear of the might of the U.S. military, felt throughout the Muslim world immediately after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, was...
  • Geeks against Jihad

    08/02/2007 12:11:14 PM PDT · by Contentions · 2 replies · 674+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.2.2007 | Max Boot
    Thomas X. Hammes is a retired Marine colonel and the author of a well-regarded work on modern war: The Sling and the Stone: On War in the 21st Century. He is also a fellow participant in an online discussion forum on military affairs called the Warlord Loop. I was so taken with one of his recent postings on how to battle jihadists on the Internet (a major venue for Islamist organizing and proselytizing) that I asked him if he would adapt it for contentions readers. He kindly agreed. Here it is: "For the last few years, individuals and private organizations...
  • Casualty Counts

    08/01/2007 8:29:47 AM PDT · by Contentions · 3 replies · 297+ views
    contentions ^ | 8.1.2007 | Max Boot
    Critics of the troop surge have been arguing that it isn’t making any difference on the ground—the only thing it’s doing, they claim, is driving up American casualties. The facts are starting to contradict their claims. I’ve recently posted a couple of items noting that reliable on-the-ground observers—namely Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack of The Brookings Institution and John Burns of the New York Times—have found that violence against Iraqis is falling. Now comes news that the number of American casualties is also declining, at least temporarily. There were spikes in the number of Americans killed in action in April...
  • John Burns

    07/31/2007 11:52:59 AM PDT · by Contentions · 8 replies · 476+ views
    contentions ^ | 7.31.2007 | Max Boot
    Say what you will about reporters in general or the New York Times in particular: John Burns breaks all the stereotypes. As the Times’ longtime Baghdad bureau chief, he has been a fearless and honest chronicler of the war. He has presented plenty of evidence of disasters, but he isn’t afraid to highlight successes when they occur, and to warn of the dangers of American disengagement.
  • One Step Back, Two Steps Forward

    07/30/2007 10:47:31 AM PDT · by Contentions · 2 replies · 336+ views
    contentions ^ | 7.30.2007 | Max Boot
    An interesting article appeared in the Sunday New York Times updating developments in Basra. Things are not going so well in this large city in southern Iraq, where various Shiite militias are battling one another for control of political power, oil, and various criminal enterprises. The British had prided themselves for years on having a better approach than their more heavy-handed American counterparts to counterinsurgency, but, lo and behold, four years into the war, the trends seem more positive in Anbar than in Basra. What went wrong?
  • New Polls on the War

    07/24/2007 10:25:30 AM PDT · by Contentions · 9 replies · 504+ views
    contentions ^ | Max Boot
    The latest New York Times/CBS News poll brings moderately positive news about public attitudes toward the war in Iraq. For the raw results, click here. For the Times write-up, click here. The percentage of the public saying that invading Iraq was the correct decision has risen slightly. Forty-two percent now say it was the right thing to do, while 51 percent say we should have stayed out. That’s a shift from the May poll that had found only 35 percent in support of the invasion and 61 percent claiming it was a mistake. In addition, the public assessment of how...
  • Iraq isn't Vietnam, Henry(Max Boot)

    07/22/2007 5:18:09 PM PDT · by kellynla · 24 replies · 728+ views
    los angeles times ^ | July 22, 2007 | Max Boot
    As congress debates the war in Iraq, it's becoming clear that many lawmakers want to bring the troops home while avoiding the likely consequences -- a ruinous civil war and a calamitous victory for Iran and Al Qaeda. This has led to much pining for some kind of negotiated solution -- what the Iraq Study Group called a "new diplomatic offensive" -- that might allow us a graceful exit. Enter Henry Kissinger, the octogenarian "wise man" who is an advisor to President Bush. While rightly stressing that a "precipitate withdrawal" of U.S. forces would result in a "geopolitical calamity," he...
  • Low-Hanging Fruit

    07/20/2007 11:19:07 AM PDT · by Contentions · 6 replies · 366+ views
    contentions ^ | 7.20.2007 | Max Boot
    On the Washington Post op-ed page today, Michael Gerson, Bush’s former chief speechwriter, seconds a point I’ve been making for a while regarding the malign role of Syria and Iran in Iraq. While Iran is the bigger problem, Syria is more vulnerable to outside pressure and has fewer good options for retaliation. It is, in the words of a former Bush administration official quoted in Gerson’s article, “lower-hanging fruit.” It would make sense for either the U.S. or Israel (which has its own reasons to be aggrieved about Syrian sponsorship of terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hizballah) to apply...
  • Friedman’s Folly

    07/19/2007 11:04:00 AM PDT · by Contentions · 3 replies · 533+ views
    contentions ^ | 7.19.2007 | Max Boot
    Thomas Friedman is the second- or third-best columnist at the New York Times. Admittedly that’s damning with faint praise. But he does know a fair amount about the Middle East and some other topics, and even if he repeats himself far too often (especially on the need for ending oil dependency), and gets a lot of things wrong (such as his support for the Oslo Peace Process), and exaggerates in those areas where he’s basically right (his support of globalization), I find him often worth a read, which is more than I can say for some of his colleagues. But...