Posted on 08/13/2007 12:34:24 PM PDT by Contentions
The opinion writers for the New York Times do not seem to have gotten the news that the troop surge is working. (For the latest indication, see this USA Today story reporting that the number of truck bombs and other large al-Qaeda-style attacks in Iraq have declined nearly 50 percent since the United States started increasing troop levels in Iraq about six months ago.) Columnist Nicholas Kristof writes today that staggering on in Iraq will only delay the inevitablethat is, our defeat.
Oddly enough he buttresses this argument with an analogy to the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. He argues that the Soviets and the Afghans alike would have been far better off if the USSR had withdrawn earlier.
(Excerpt) Read more at commentarymagazine.com ...
The Soviets and the Afghans alike would have been far better off if the Taliban took control earlier?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.