Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $79,241
97%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 97%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: kangaroojustice

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Legal Bombshell: Leftist Judges Rule Alex Jones May Not Discuss 1st Amendment, Say He Is Innocent, or Claim Court Case Rigged

    07/21/2022 7:54:04 AM PDT · by Red Badger · 88 replies
    https://summit.news ^ | 21 July, 2022 | Staff
    Effectively, the judges have ruled that Alex Jones is guilty before proven guilty and will instruct the jury to determine just how guilty he is. In an unprecedented assault on due process and the rule of law, both a Texas and Connecticut judge have ruled that Alex Jones may not discuss the First Amendment, defend his innocence, or point out the rigged elements of the upcoming Sandy Hook defamation case against him. Here is a limited breakdown of some of the most egregious constitutional violations of due process and the First Amendment as explained by a third-party legal adviser: You...
  • Prosecutors seek more severe sentence for Chauvin than in state guidelines

    05/02/2021 10:40:35 AM PDT · by RandFan · 36 replies
    The Hill ^ | 05/01/21 07:28 PM EDT | BY JORDAN WILLIAMS -
    Prosecutors are seeking a more severe sentence for Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis Police officer convicted of second-degree murder and other charges in the death of George Floyd. Floyd died last year in police custody after Chauvin kneeled on his neck for over nine minutes outside of a Minneapolis convenience store. Following Floyd's death, Chauvin was removed from the police for and charged in connection to the killing. The former officer's trial began earlier this year, and lasted for three weeks. On April 20, a jury found Chauvin guilty of second- and third- degree murder, as well as second-degree manslaughter....
  • Europe And The ICJ

    07/11/2004 3:43:12 PM PDT · by goldstategop · 4 replies · 483+ views
    Jerusalem Post ^ | 7/11/04 | Jerusalem Post
    Europe and the ICJ Many things have been and remain to be said about Friday's advisory opinion on Israel's security fence by the 15-member International Court of Justice, most of it having to do with the court's jurisdiction, fitness, and reasoning. How can Israel expect justice from an international tribunal on which no Israeli jurist is eligible to serve? How can we expect it from one on which Egyptian and Jordanian judges do serve? How does the court sidestep the question of the terrorism that created the fence and then render an opinion on the legality of settlements? But all...