Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $33,557
41%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 41%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: dccircuit

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Judge Sullivan To Consider Criminal Contempt Charge Against Michael Flynn

    05/14/2020 9:29:04 AM PDT · by blam · 74 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 5-14-2020 | Joel B Pollak
    Judge Emmet G. Sullivan will consider whether to find former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in criminal contempt of court after the Department of Justice (DOJ) moved last week to drop its prosecution of Flynn for lying to the FBI. Sullivan issued an order Wednesday appointing retired judge John Gleeson as amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) to argue against the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the case, as well as to advise the court on whether it should begin contempt proceedings. New Flynn Filing – Judge Sullivan appoints retired Judge John Gleeson as amicus "to present arguments in opposition to...
  • Watergate prosecutors who want to weigh in on Flynn case include Dem donors, outspoken Trump critics

    05/14/2020 5:29:35 AM PDT · by knighthawk · 7 replies
    Fox News ^ | May 14 2020 | Tyler Olson
    Sixteen former Watergate prosecutors have notified Emmet Sullivan, a judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, that they intend to file an "amicus curiae" ("friend of the court") brief in the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn after the Department of Justice (DOJ) moved to dismiss the charges against him. Flynn had previously pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators, but he moved to withdraw that plea earlier this year, followed by the DOJ decision last week. Sullivan, however, has not yet approved the DOJ's motion and made the unusual move this week of...
  • Judges Are Umpires, Not Ringmasters. Sullivan invites outsiders to weigh in on the Flynn case—an unconstitutional judicial power grab.

    05/14/2020 5:27:26 AM PDT · by karpov · 26 replies
    Wall Street Journal ^ | May 13, 2020 | Alan M. Dershowitz
    The Constitution limits the jurisdiction of federal judges to actual cases and controversies. They may not offer advisory opinions or intrude on executive or legislative powers, except when the other branches have exercised them in an unconstitutional manner. Federal judges are umpires deciding matters about which litigants disagree. If the litigants come to an agreement, there is no controversy. The case is over. Many judges disapprove of this limitation on their power. Not happy being umpires, they want to be commissioner of baseball. Thus courts have arrogated to themselves powers the Constitution explicitly denies them. They have invented exceptions to...
  • Lawyer appointed by Judge Sullivan to offer arguments in Flynn case already has slammed Trump WH's 'improper political influence'.

    05/14/2020 4:02:17 AM PDT · by Carriage Hill · 39 replies
    Fox News ^ | 5/13/2020 | Gregg Re
    D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an unusual order Wednesday appointing a law firm partner "to present arguments in opposition to the government's motion to dismiss" the matter -- and to consider whether the court should hold Flynn in contempt for perjury. The partner, retired federal judge John Gleeson, has openly criticized the Trump administration's handling of Michael Flynn's case, raising concerns that he was selected to improperly bolster Sullivan's efforts to keep the Flynn case alive even though both the government and defendant want it dismissed. Sullivan has previously suggested Flynn may have committed treason, in a bizarre...
  • The Constitution Requires Judge Emmet Sullivan’s Lawless Amicus Order Against Michael Flynn Be Overturned

    05/14/2020 6:09:37 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 61 replies
    The Federalist ^ | May 14, 2020 | Margot Cleveland
    The U.S. Constitution makes clear that the judiciary has no business second-guessing prosecutorial decisions. That’s what Michael Flynn judge Emmet Sullivan decided to do. On May 13, Judge Emmet Sullivan issued a blatantly biased and unconstitutional order in the long-lasting Michael Flynn criminal case. To preserve the rule of law and our constitutional separation of powers, the Department of Justice has no choice now but to seek a writ of mandamus from the D.C. Circuit Court ordering the criminal charge against Flynn dismissed and reassigning the case to another judge. On Tuesday, Judge Sullivan shocked court watchers when he entered...
  • U.S. judge asks if ex-Trump aide Flynn should be held in contempt

    05/14/2020 7:52:32 AM PDT · by where's_the_Outrage? · 33 replies
    Reuters ^ | May 13, 2020 | Jan Wolfe and Sarah N. Lynch
    Most relevant part of article" Sullivan said he was seeking Gleeson's recommendation on whether Flynn should face a criminal contempt charge for perjury because he testified under oath that he was guilty of lying to the FBI but then reversed course and said he had never lied.
  • The Flynn case isn’t over until the judge says it’s over [John Gleeson, dirty Clinton judge]

    05/13/2020 8:08:26 PM PDT · by kiryandil · 50 replies
    The Beijington Post [The Washington Post] ^ | May 11, 2020 | John Gleeson, David O'Neil and Marshall Miller
    The Justice Department’s move to dismiss the prosecution of former national security adviser Michael Flynn does not need to be the end of the case — and it shouldn’t be. The Justice Department has made conflicting statements to the federal judge overseeing the case, Emmet G. Sullivan. He has the authority, the tools and the obligation to assess the credibility of the department’s stated reasons for abruptly reversing course. The department’s motion to dismiss the Flynn case is actually just a request — one that requires “leave of the court” before it is effective. The executive branch has unreviewable authority...
  • Judge Sullivan must reject Barr’s usurpation of judicial power

    05/11/2020 3:12:43 PM PDT · by where's_the_Outrage? · 82 replies
    Boston Globe ^ | May 11, 2020 | Laurence H. Tribe
    US District Judge Emmett G. Sullivan unquestionably knows that when a federal defendant pleads guilty but then asks to be relieved of his fate, it is up to the court to decide the merit of his argument — no matter who supports it, including a prosecutor who has switched sides. Sullivan is presiding over the case in which former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn pleaded guilty twice to serious federal crimes and is ready for sentencing. The fly in the ointment is a recent request by Attorney General William Barr that basically says: Never mind. Ignore those guilty pleas; Flynn...
  • Judge Justin Walker: Tough and Qualified for the DC Circuit

    05/04/2020 3:42:28 AM PDT · by cotton1706 · 5 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | 5/4/20 | Garrett Ventry
    Donald Trump’s most lasting legacy will be his appointments to the federal bench. In his tenure so far, the Senate has confirmed 193 judges, 51 of whom were circuit judges. All were nominated by President Trump. Indeed, President Trump and the Senate have confirmed federal appellate judges faster than any other president in U.S. history. For all judges, President Trump’s rate is the second fastest. The Senate returns to Washington next week, and on the agenda is another stellar judicial nominee, Judge Justin Walker. Walker is the quintessential Trump appointee. He’s young, he has impeccable legal credentials, and he has...
  • Judge orders Michael Flynn’s former attorneys to execute another search for documents after new trove discovered

    04/28/2020 2:02:50 PM PDT · by bitt · 123 replies
    washington examiner ^ | 4/28/2020 | Jerry Dunleavy
    The federal judge presiding over retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn’s case issued a surprise order telling the former national security adviser’s previous attorneys to conduct another search of their entire case archive after it was revealed they failed to turn thousands of documents over to Flynn’s new defense team. The ruling by Judge Emmet Sullivan was made public Tuesday afternoon after Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony, Flynn’s former lawyers at the powerhouse firm Covington & Burling, claimed there were 6,800 records they had only just now unearthed and turned over to Flynn’s current defense team, which has been led by...
  • DOJ will appeal ruling over sealed Mueller materials to Supreme Court

    04/24/2020 2:52:16 PM PDT · by yesthatjallen · 10 replies
    The Hill ^ | 04 24 2020 | Harper Neidig
    The Department of Justice will appeal to the Supreme Court after it was ordered to hand over sealed documents from former special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation to Congress. The department on Friday asked the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to stay its ruling while it petitions the high court. "Whether and under what circumstances Congress may resort to the courts to seek grand jury materials generated in a criminal investigation in aid of an impeachment inquiry is plainly a question of great significance to all three branches of government, as well as to the functioning of the grand jury...
  • Judge denies new trial for Roger Stone

    04/16/2020 4:01:56 PM PDT · by Coronal · 34 replies
    NBC News ^ | April 16, 2020 | Pete Williams
    The federal judge overseeing the trial of longtime Trump associate Roger Stone on Thursday denied his motion for a new trial that was based on a claim of juror bias. Federal District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson said Stone's lawyers failed to demonstrate that a woman selected as a juror was biased against President Donald Trump, failed to disclose those views during jury selection and should not have been allowed to serve. "The defendant has not shown that the juror lied; nor has he shown that the supposedly disqualifying evidence could not have been found through the exercise of due...
  • For Easter, a federal judge wrote a luminous decision defending religious liberty

    04/12/2020 3:57:56 AM PDT · by cotton1706 · 20 replies
    Americanthinker.com ^ | 4/12/20 | Andrea Widburg
    On Saturday, American Thinker pointed out that Democrat-run jurisdictions, at both the state and the local level, seem to be enjoying a little too much the power that a public health emergency has put into their hands. One of the examples was the order Mayor Greg Fischer issued in Louisville, Kentucky. He banned all Easter services, including drive-ins, and explicitly instructed his police department to write down the license plate numbers of people attending a drive-in Easter Sunday service. The On Fire Christian Center sought an emergency temporary restraining order in the United States District Court for the Western District...
  • Federal Judge Issues Restraining Order Against Kentucky City and Police Attempting to Block Easter Worship…

    04/11/2020 4:06:38 PM PDT · by TexasGurl24 · 17 replies
    Conservative Tree House ^ | 04/11/2020 | Conservative Tree House
    Well, at least one federal judge has some common sense. Louisville Kentucky Mayor, Greg Fischer, attempted to ban drive-in Easter church services and use local police to arrest and detain any non-compliant parishioners. The church quickly sued Mayor Greg Fischer and the city of Louisville on Friday, arguing the mayor’s directive for churches to forgo gatherings to help slow the spread of COVID-19 violated Constitutional rights and their religious liberty. The judge agreed. District Court Judge walker issued an emergency restraining order banning the city from “enforcing; attempting to enforce; threatening to enforce; or otherwise requiring compliance with any prohibition...
  • Kentucky Judge Grants Temporary Restraining Order Against Mayor For Prohibiting Drive-In Easter Church Service

    04/11/2020 2:37:56 PM PDT · by BackRoads775 · 78 replies
    https://www1.cbn.com ^ | 04-11-2020 | 0Andrea Morris
    A judge in Louisville, Kentucky issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) that would stop Mayor Greg Fischer from preventing a church from having a drive-in Easter service. According to the First Liberty Institute, a religious law group, the TRO was filed on Friday in the US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky on behalf of On Fire Christian Church located in Louisville. Judge Justin Walker granted the order on Saturday, preventing the city from "enforcing; attempting to enforce; threatening to enforce; or otherwise requiring compliance with any prohibition on drive-in church services at On Fire," according to court...
  • District judge says city cant stop Louisville church from holding drive-in Easter service

    04/11/2020 12:55:16 PM PDT · by abb · 63 replies
    WLKY-TV ^ | April 11, 2020` | WLKY Digital Team
    LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A Louisville-based church was granted an injunction in response to the city's crackdown on drive-in services. Earlier this week, On Fire Christian church sued Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer and the city of Louisville, arguing the mayor's action to stop drive-in services at churches was a violation of constitutional rights. Advertisement According to court documents obtained by WLKY, Kentucky District Judge Justin Walker issued a temporary restraining order Saturday, which says the city is banned from stopping On Fire Christian Church from holding the services. "The Court enjoins Louisville from enforcing; attempting to enforce; threatening to enforce; or...
  • U.S. appeals court hands win to Trump plan to resume federal executions

    04/07/2020 1:01:41 PM PDT · by John W · 25 replies
    Reuter’s.com ^ | April 7, 2020 | Lawrence Hurley
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump administration's effort to resume federal executions got a boost on Tuesday from a U.S. appeals court, which tossed a district judge's injunction that blocked four death penalty sentences from being carried out. The 2-1 ruling by a three judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit could pave the way to the Justice Department carrying out the first execution of federal death row inmates since 2003, although other issues remain to be litigated. The two judges in the majority, Greg Katsas and Neomi Rao, were both appointed to the...
  • Trump Drains The Swamp, Keeps His Promise with Judge Justin Walker

    04/03/2020 8:41:26 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 5 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | April 3, 2020 | Mike Davis
    President Trump continues his record-breaking transformation of the federal judiciary with the selection of Judge Justin Walker -- a young, brilliant conservative legal mind and everyday American -- for the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Walker, a new federal trial judge in Louisville, Kentucky, is a first-generation college graduate, an outside-the-beltway legal powerhouse, and a committed constitutionalist who understands a judge’s modest, but critical, role is to interpret the law as written -- not how that judge wishes it were written if he were a senator. Very few Trump could pick for this sought-after seat would...
  • Full D.C. Circuit to review Trump's border-wall spending 'If these executive actions are undone, our nation's safety could be in jeopardy'

    03/26/2020 8:59:02 AM PDT · by rktman · 27 replies
    wnd.com ^ | 3/24/2020 | WND staff
    The full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will review a ruling upholding President Trump's authority to use appropriated funding from Congress to build a wall to secure the southern border. The U.S. House, led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, is appealing a lower-court decision in its lawsuit against Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. The Democratic-led House alleges Trump's declaration of a national emergency to tap military funds for a border usurps Congress's constitutional authority to appropriate funds. The American Center for Law and Justice filed a brief in support of the president. Not only have Pelosi and her "extreme" colleagues "refused to...
  • DC Circuit to rehear Trump administration cases on 'executive privilege' and 'border wall funding'...

    03/13/2020 10:28:17 PM PDT · by caww · 14 replies
    washingtonexaminer ^ | 3/13/2020 | Tim Pearce
    The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will rehear arguments in two Trump administration cases over a House subpoena to White House counsel Don McGahn and funding for a southern border wall. The court vacated previous rulings in both cases on Friday, according to Politico. Arguments for each are scheduled for April 28 in front of the full D.C. Circuit. House lawmakers petitioned the court last week to revisit a lawsuit to force McGahn through subpoena to testify to Congress. A divided three-judge panel ruled on Feb. 28 that the Judiciary could not decide what amounted to a political debate between...