“A plausible vernacular interpretation is: “I need you to locate/identify 11,780 votes’ worth of ballots that were improperly accepted under unconstitutional procedures—ballots that, if invalidated, would restore the result I actually won.”
I hate to break it to you but that interpretation could easily be construed as election interference because what you wrote infers he was asking to invalidate only enough votes against him to give him the lead Asking instead to invalidate all questionable votes either for or against would not be seeking an unfair advantage but it also means he still could have lost in the end.