Free Republic

They simply need to arrest this judge for violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. Judges do not have the power to judge how the legislative or executive branches carry out their jobs. This power is given to we the people at election time. Charge him with Judicial Insurrection, send him to GITMO for a fair trial, then execute him.

Why the need to provide details of this operation is beyond me. Is, possibly, some of this actually disinformation mixed with a sprinkling of truth as part of a military operation of it’s own?

The answer to all of your questions is found in Article IV, Section 4. We the people judge the actions of those we elect at election time. Anyone else getting in the way of OUR GUARANTEED power to do so is unconstitutional.

Tell me, as all of the cost of having a business mount up, at which point does paying anything to social security take place?

We are talking about social security cost to the employee, not all the other cost associated with operating a business. It is the individual employee who receives social security benefits at retirement, not his employer. These benefits come at a cost to that employee, half of which is misrepresented to him as being paid on his behalf by his employer. This is purposeful dishonesty as without his labor, there are no social security taxes generated and this PARTICULAR cost to the employer disappears. The entire cost relative to social security exist because of the employee’s Labor. His labor triggers this and pays the entire cost.

The employer revenue results from the combined labor of EACH employee. Each employee comes at a cost to the employer which includes paying 50% of THAT employees social security obligation to the government. This arrangement helps to hide from the employee the true amount of social security taxes being stolen from HIS labor contribution to the employer. It is a dishonest system that needs to end. To end this, legislation needs to be passed that requires showing the TOTAL amount of social security taxes his labor is producing on his pay check. The employers role in paying 50% should be eliminated.

A typical run of stairs is 10’ per 8’ ceiling for each floors. A typical stair height is 7.5”. That totals 16 stairs per floor, not 10. 10 steps would be 12” high, quite a challenge. Five flights of stairs would total 80 steps, not 50.

If you hire me as an employee, you budget YOUR expenses to have me work for you. Two of those expenses are YOUR contribution to my health care plan AND YOUR part of my social security cost. This is money YOU pay because I am your employee. If I don’t exist, those cost to you don’t exist.

I am an overall expense to you that I don’t get to see but my labor is worth to you that entire expense. This means that I am the reason you incurred the cost of having me as an employee. My labor is paying for what you budget for hiring me. That my paycheck shows me my supposed contribution to social security, it hides the fact that you contribute just as much as part of your cost of having me work for you. I pay ALL of it with my labor.

The employee pays 100% of his social security taxes. The government hides this fact by having it appear that his employer picks up 50%. If people saw how much the government was actually stealing from them there would be massive outrage. Can’t have that now, can we?

You are correct about Thane Eugene Cesar. Sirhan was never in a position to fire bullets behind RFK’s right ear much less close enough to leave powder burns on the wound.

Who pays when an accident occurs has been the biggest impediment to driverless vehicles. It is a legal spaghetti nobody has figured out.

”is for someone or some government agency to avoid embarrassment”

Embarrassment? How about imprisonment and or execution for committing Treason against this nation by committing and covering up their role in the assassination of JFK. We KNOW who did it and it wasn’t Oswald. The fact the our government did it is provable by allowing today’s technology to examine the Zapruder film. If there are ANY alterations, the government did it. It’s that simple. Mr. “Lone nut” never had possession of the film and was killed two days after the assassination. Demand that the Zapruder film be analyzed by today’s technology. That’s all we need to do. There are quite a few alterations that need to be accounted for.

This past Friday, I sang “Help Me Rhonda” at karaoke. I hope it didn’t have any connection with his passing.

We already have a law. It’s in the Constitution. Our government is based upon the concept that we the people are “represented” by those WE elect. This is GUARANTEED to us by Article IV, Section 4. Debt that is forced upon us today by people WE never had the ability to vote for denies US that representative form of government. This means that it is unconstitutional to spend more than is taken in. Borrowing money from a future unborn generation without their ability to give their consent and expecting THEM to pay the note is THEFT. This is certainly NOT something the Constitution would allow.

” None of those guys left paper trails”

They left plenty enough to prove that the government did it. All that’s needed is a high tech inspection of the Zapruder film. If altered in any way, the government did it. Guess what, there is plenty of proof that it’s been altered.

If your vote can be overridden by how some other state votes then it isn’t equal to a vote that cannot be overridden. This is a direct violation of the 14th Amendment which requires equal treatment under the law. Simply unconstitutional.

Third-party pay has inserted many extra people into the doctor-patient relationship who do NOTHING for the patient in attending his or her health care issue. Hospitals end up as money launderers for folks at the insurance office, the lawyers office, the court house, drug makers, health care product makers, and armies of pencil pushers in all of their offices to keep track of everything. It used to be just the doctor and his nurse you had to pay for. Now, thanks to third-party pay, there are hundreds of leaches making a living off of your need to see a doctor. And we all wonder why health cost is so expensive.

We have present day technology that if put into practice could tell you if an item has been stolen. This would reduce the problem immensely. Let’s say, for example, items carried a barcode to be read by a scanner that emitted a “stolen” signal when scanned. The only way this can be changed is when purchased and the store edits the “stolen” signal and replaces it with a “purchased” signal, all at the cash register as it is rung up. Those who steal don’t get the correction and are caught at the pawn shop. Items with the barcode tag removed would be assumed as having been stolen. Not many people want to turn themselves in and stealing has no market. This is possible today.

In both of your examples, we have the technology to identify those who commit crimes WITHOUT the need for high speed chases. Apprehension isn’t the problem. Conviction and incarceration are.

Using high speed chases should not be part of the solution. The risk to others is not worth it. These stores have cameras, the parking lots have cameras. Identifying vehicles and who the owners are is possible with modern day technology. The process should not and does not have to endanger innocent people who might happen to be in the way.