Free Republic

She took a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States as well as the laws of the state of Louisiana. If her personal beliefs prohibit her from doing so she has that option. It’s called “resignation”. She doesn’t have the right to ignore enforcement of a state law that her job title of sheriff is duty bound to uphold. She should be forced to step down or face arrest for insurrection.

I hear President Sam Kenison screaming it now.....YOU LIVE IN A DESSERT ! MOVE! LOL!

The Tenth Amendment is there exactly for folks who think like you. Sorry. Your "clause" does not trump an Amendment. The founders wrote an entire Constitution and never meant for the "Commerce Clause" to over rule ANY of it much less almost all of it according to folks like you.

Because of the Tenth Amendment, this particular issue is purely a state by state decision. Even if Congress passed an amendment, two-thirds of the states would have to ratify it. Not possible. Congress can't do shit.

This song says it all.

Perhaps it was ALL part of the plan. Trump might be one of "them". You do need to consider this in light of all that has gone down since Covid hit the shores. He was the original pied piper of the shot "they" wanted all of us to get. "They" knew we would never trust "them" if "they" had championed it so perhaps Trump was "their" Trojan Horse in the endeavor to steal the nation and kill off as many of their enemies as possible in doing so. Trump was one third of the government when the election was stolen. He had all of the necessary powers to right the wrong that had been committed. Instead, he wasted the last two months of his Presidency acting as though he was at the mercy of the justice system, a system HE was in charge of. Something doesn't add up when it comes to trusting Trump in any of this.

The South didn't want to overthrow the constitution. They simply wanted their own country and to be left alone by the north. Once they seceded, that constitution he speaks of could not be affected by them.

Yes. It all starts with each state enforcing the Tenth Amendment.

My point stands. He was NEVER a LEGAL President. The language in the U.S. Constitution says so. That oath business is window dressing.

The Constitution proves it with the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three and the first two words of the eligibility requirements in Article II.
The Twentieth Amendment is an instruction to Congress to ensure that the President-Elect is eligible to serve, in fact he is burdened with providing proof to Congress, and if there is a failure to qualify, Congress is instructed to name a President. Congress, in this instance, as they are prone to do all of the time, simply ignored their Constitutional duty. That they ignored their duty does not mean we had a legal president because the first two words of the eligibility requirements plainly state “No person” who is a natural born citizen can serve as President. It doesn’t say “No Person except those not vetted by Congress”. It says “No person”. That Congress failed it’s Constitutional duty under the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three does not a legal President make. It makes a usurper. No matter what the media, democrats, and rinos call him, Obama was an eight year userpation of the office of President.

Wrong. He was NEVER a legal President. He was a usurper.

Since when are businesses allowed to practice medicine without a license? They have no right to dictate medical decisions to their employees. This, especially, against their employees will. Nuremberg hung those who did this during WWII.

He somehow misses the real possibility that it was an INTENTIONAL release to initiate the great global “reset”. By refusing to mention this, his article is pure propaganda.

The first line is correct. The other two, a total joke. Get rid of them. Permanently.

Nuremberg II is essential if this is to be properly addressed. No mercy.

Introduce legislation that requires all oceanfront property to be confiscated by the government in the name of climate change safety. If they are serious about the threat of rising sea waters, they will assuredly support legislation that saves the lives of those who are currently most at risk, the property owners along the ocean. Force their hand and then watch them squirm trying to explain why they don’t care about the lives of those along the ocean enough to support the legislation. If they don’t care enough about those who are actually at the greatest risk of their climate change predictions, it blows away their entire argument about needing to do anything at all.

In addition, a natural born citizen does not require a law or statute to become one. You either are or you aren’t. Levin quoting a statute destroys his argument right off the bat. He is not one of us. Levin is one of them acting like he is one of us. It’s what their side does all of the time.

Levin is full of shit. If one parent is not a citizen, the child inherits that citizenship at birth along with the citizenship of the other parent. The result of “dual” citizenship parents is “duel” citizenship birth. The child can be a citizen of either country or both. Natural born citizenship can only apply to a birth from parents of the same citizenship and under the political jurisdiction of the country they are citizens of. The child can ONLY be a citizen of the same country, thus natural born citizen.

We need to put a nickel deposit on cigarette butts and they would never be thrown away again, or if they are, someone will pick them up. Worked for bottles for years.

The Tow Companies are all sidelined with “Tow-Vid”.