Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,907
31%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 31%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: 32bit

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • [Intel vs. AMD] Itanium and Opteron contrasted

    11/09/2002 2:11:31 PM PST · by JameRetief · 13 replies · 451+ views
    The Inquirer ^ | 11-09-02 | Brent Rehmel c/o The Letterman
    Itanium and Opteron contrasted Letter What are the options for Intel? By The Letternan: Saturday 09 November 2002, 10:04 THE COMPARISON SPECS on Itanium 3 and Opteron here look pretty good. This appears to show both processors passing the current fastest server chip by a significant lead. However, for x86 code, Opteron looks like it will hit the market as fast as the fastest x86 processor while Itanium 3 is a joke on x86 code. It is too bad that there are not specs available on Yamhill because I have a very strong suspicion that it was killed, not because...
  • [Intel] "New" Celeron dictated by marchitecture, not architecture

    07/12/2002 3:15:33 PM PDT · by JameRetief · 21 replies · 535+ views
    The Inquirer ^ | July 11, 2002 | Andrew Busigin
    Column Heigh-Ho Celeron! By Andrew Busigin: Thursday 11 July 2002, 19:14 INTEL'S LATEST developments around future Celeron performance make for an interest study in marketing. It appears that once again, Intel Marketing folks are steering the engineering team, and it shouldn't surprise anyone, since the Celeron has always been a marketing phenomenon more than an engineering product. See Intel to shift P4 Celerons to Northwood core History Lesson The origin of the Celeron, for those of you more recently come to the party, was a marketing coup for Intel, whereby they managed to create an artificial segmentation of their CPU...