Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Worship of Mary? (An Observation)

Posted on 05/30/2008 10:21:34 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

Some of you will remember my recent decision to become a Catholic. I suppose I should be surprised it ended getting derailed into a 'Catholic vs. Protestant' thread, but after going further into the Religion forum, I suppose it's par for the course.

There seems to be a bit of big issue concerning Mary. I wanted to share an observation of sorts.

Now...although I was formerly going by 'Sola Scriptura', my father was born and raised Catholic, so I do have some knowledge of Catholic doctrine (not enough, at any rate...so consider all observations thusly).

Mary as a 'co-redeemer', Mary as someone to intercede for us with regards to our Lord Jesus.

Now...I can definitely see how this would raise some hairs. After all, Jesus Himself said that He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and that none come to the Father but through Him. I completely agree.

I do notice a bit of a fundamental difference in perception though. Call it a conflict of POV. Do Catholics worship Mary (as I've seen a number of Protestants proclaim), or do they rather respect and venerate her (as I've seen Catholics claim)? Note that it's one thing to regard someone with reverence; I revere President Bush as the noted leader of the free world. I revere my father. I revere Dr. O'Neil, a humorous and brilliant math teacher at my university. It's an act of respect.

But do I WORSHIP them?

No. Big difference between respecting/revering and worshiping. At least, that's how I view it.

I suppose it's also a foible to ask Mary to pray for us, on our behalf...but don't we tend to also ask other people to pray for us? Doesn't President Bush ask for people to pray for him? Don't we ask our family members to pray for us for protection while on a trip? I don't see quite a big disconnect between that and asking Mary to help pray for our wellbeing.

There is some question to the fact that she is physically dead. Though it stands to consider that she is still alive, in Heaven. Is it not common practice to not just regard our physical life, but to regard most of all our spirit, our soul? That which survives the flesh before ascending to Heaven or descending to Hell after God's judgment?

I don't think it's that big of a deal. I could change my mind after reading more in-depth, but I don't think that the Catholic Church has decreed via papal infallibility that Mary is to be placed on a higher pedestal than Jesus, or even to be His equal.

Do I think she is someone to be revered and respected? Certainly. She is the mother of Jesus, who knew Him for His entire life as a human on Earth. Given that He respected her (for He came to fulfill the old laws; including 'Honor Thy Father and Mother'), I don't think it's unnatural for other humans to do the same. I think it's somewhat presumptuous to regard it on the same level as idolatry or supplanting Jesus with another.

In a way, I guess the way Catholics treat Mary and the saints is similar to how the masses treated the Apostles following the Resurrection and Jesus's Ascension: people who are considered holy in that they have a deep connection with Jesus and His Word, His Teachings, His Message. As the Apostles spread the Good News and are remembered and revered to this day for their work, so to are the works of those sainted remembered and revered. Likewise with Mary. Are the Apostles worshiped? No. That's how it holds with Mary and the saints.

At least, that's how my initial thoughts on the subject are. I'll have to do more reading.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; mary; rcc; romancatholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,441-1,4601,461-1,4801,481-1,500 ... 11,821-11,826 next last
To: Mad Dawg

Does anybody else smell burned hash file or something? I’m getting told there’s a post #1459 but the display stops at #1453. Plus my last attempted reply came up with no addressee.


1,461 posted on 06/03/2008 9:58:24 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1453 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
In the 1st century BCE a Jewish State was set up around Nehardea by two brothers, ANILAI (Anilaos) and ASINAI (Asinaios), and this lasted for many years. The Jews of Babylon (Babylon was an empire which contained Kurdistan) remained in constant touch with the Jews of Israel and even supplied some of their leaders (e.g. Hillel) with arms and supplies.

That is shaky and tenuous history at best. The city of Babylon was long since destroyed by the first century AD. The Babylonia this source refers to is the province that was under Parthian rule at the time. It's possible that there was a Jewish community there at the time. But there is no historical evidence that St. Peter was ever there. There is none, because he wasn't

When St. Peter refers to Babylon in his epistle, he is clearly speaking metaphorically about Rome. And there is plenty of historical evidence that long predates your arbitrary "founding of the Catholic Church around AD 400" that places St. Peter in Rome.

What's funny is that Protestants have no problem calling Rome the "Whore of Babylon" and recognizing Rome as the city John was talking about when he speaks of Babylon in Revelations. But when Peter says the "Church that is in Babylon," in his epistle you immediately assume he means Kurdistan.
1,462 posted on 06/03/2008 10:03:28 AM PDT by Antoninus (John 6:54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

One of the servers is still catching up on the indexing after the crash. This too shall pass.


1,463 posted on 06/03/2008 10:07:30 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
I see. So when a homeless guy asks me for change, he's worshiping me?

If you're not when he asks you, than you're right, it's not worship, rather its a typical sign of delusional psychosis.

In English it's not been since the 1600s that the phrase "I pray thee" was used to ask for something. The issue is not respect for great saints, or the humility to ask others to pray for you--something I do routinely to my brothers who are alive. Do you?

But you and I, like the homeless man, cannot ask someone something if they are not there, and cannot hear us.

God alone is omniscient; neither Mary, nor any of the other saints in Heaven are--and I challenge you to show me where in holy Scripture citizenship in heaven for humans implies gaining God's omniscience or omnipresence.

There is no difference between humbly begging your brother who is alive on earth to pray for you than there is humbly begging St. Peter, St. Paul, St. Andrew, St. Therese, or St. Bernadette, all of whom are alive in Heaven, to pray for you.

Ummm, just WHY is that, just because you assert it? Please prove to me that the saints in heaven can hear us, just like the saints we speak to on earth can.

And please notice I have not given one word of insult to you in return to the insulting manner you addressed me.

1,464 posted on 06/03/2008 10:08:08 AM PDT by AnalogReigns ( Quinque Solor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1410 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
God alone is omniscient; neither Mary, nor any of the other saints in Heaven are--and I challenge you to show me where in holy Scripture...

Catholics are not burdened by the man-made error sola scriptura.

...citizenship in heaven for humans implies gaining God's omniscience or omnipresence.

Unnecessary.

1,465 posted on 06/03/2008 10:11:31 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

When St. Peter refers to Babylon in his epistle, he is clearly speaking metaphorically about Rome

Perhaps allegorically but not metaphorically.

1,466 posted on 06/03/2008 10:12:04 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Petronski; Quix
That is irrelevant to Catholics. The Catholic Church began circa AD 32, at the Pentecost.

I'll see your nonsense and raise you:

INTRODUCTION OF SAINT LOUIS MARIE

1. It was through the Blessed Virgin Mary that Jesus came into the world, and it is also through her that he must reign in the world.

It's hard to respond to nonsense except with more nonsense.

1,467 posted on 06/03/2008 10:28:18 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1452 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Please remove me from your links ping list. I am not interested in them.

You are not on my ping list.

1,468 posted on 06/03/2008 10:32:06 AM PDT by NYer (Ignorance of scripture is ignorance of Christ." - St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1397 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

You capitalized Israel and Paul. Do you bow to Israel or Paul?


1,469 posted on 06/03/2008 10:34:32 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1394 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
I see. So when a homeless guy asks me for change, he's worshiping me?

If you're not THERE when he asks you, than you're right, it's not worship, rather its a typical sign of delusional psychosis.

In English it's not been since the 1600s that the phrase "I pray thee" was used to simply ask for something apart from supernatural prayer and worship. The issue is not respect for great saints, or the humility to ask others to pray for you--something I do routinely to my brothers who are alive. Do you?

But you and I, like the homeless man, cannot ask someone something if they are not present, and cannot hear us.

God alone is omniscient; neither Mary, nor any of the other saints in Heaven are--and I challenge you to show me where in holy Scripture citizenship in heaven for humans implies gaining God's omniscience or omnipresence.

There is no difference between humbly begging your brother who is alive on earth to pray for you than there is humbly begging St. Peter, St. Paul, St. Andrew, St. Therese, or St. Bernadette, all of whom are alive in Heaven, to pray for you.

Ummm, just WHY is that, just because you assert it? Please prove to me from the words of the Apostles that the saints in heaven can hear us, just like the saints we speak to on earth can.

I and my fellow magisterial Protestants actually venerate and respect the greatest Saints of all--the original Apostles--MORE than any Roman Catholic, in that we obey their words recorded in holy Scripture, even when they do conflict with the traditions of men, invented long after them.

And please notice I have not given one word of personal insult to you in return to the insulting manner you addressed me.

1,470 posted on 06/03/2008 10:35:59 AM PDT by AnalogReigns ( Quinque Solor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer

LOL!


1,471 posted on 06/03/2008 10:36:46 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1468 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
God alone is omniscient; neither Mary, nor any of the other saints in Heaven are--and I challenge you to show me where in holy Scripture...

Catholics are not burdened by the man-made error sola scriptura.

...citizenship in heaven for humans implies gaining God's omniscience or omnipresence.

Unnecessary.

1,472 posted on 06/03/2008 10:38:52 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1470 | View Replies]

To: trisham

That’s terribly embarrassing. LOL


1,473 posted on 06/03/2008 10:39:34 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1471 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
And please notice I have not given one word of insult to you in return to the insulting manner you addressed me.

Evidently Free Republic gives an exemption from charity.

I say again: knowing more and being in more places is not the same as knowing all and being in all places. It is not necessary for Mary and the other saints to be omniscient or omnipresent. It's still pretty remarkable, but we don't necessarily have to defend against omniscience and omnipresence,

However, if the saints are with God, and God is everywhere, what follows?

The word "pray" is still used in legal speech. And I don't think it's the request part that troubles us. I think the objection is hard to state. We need some word that doesn't sound all culty but means something like spiritual communication.

In general we would suggest that parts of the body are sort of aware of one another. If we are one in the Spirit, then the Spirit which provides our oneness can handle the communication thing.

And in any event talking about God or the saints being in some place is awkward, isn't it? Isn't is as awkward as talking about them being in some time? Where and when is God? What's it like to be with Him?

It is admittedly hard (as in impossible?) to show that the Bible says we CAN communicate with the saints, but isn't our relationship with the members of the one body is different from the relationship Saul, The Witch of Endor, and Samuel had? I'd venture a yeah-huh to that. So I don't think the case against is conclusive.

1,474 posted on 06/03/2008 10:46:34 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1464 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I hope you can help me. Who are these protestants who have so much anymosity and judgement of Catholics? I know Lutherans are similar to us. Which would mean humility, restraining from judging others, understanding that blessed mother is deserving of respect etc.

I have to admit that I am ignorant of other religions and thought they were just like Robertson, Warren, Graham, who I enjoy listening to. Lately I've come across these Rev. Wright type hate-filled "Christians" and it's almost like they have a different God. Where are they coming from? Which denominations are they. Most Christians I have known are kind and positive, have I been too sheltered?

1,475 posted on 06/03/2008 11:08:00 AM PDT by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1473 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
But you and I, like the homeless man, cannot ask someone something if they are not there, and cannot hear us.

That is the opinion of a few hundred years of Protestant scholarship. This opinion rejects the 1,600-odd years of Christian thought and belief, both Catholic and Orthodox, which existed prior to it.

Please prove to me that the saints in heaven can hear us, just like the saints we speak to on earth can.

There's plenty of proof in the way of the thousands of substantiated miracles happening in the aftermath of praying for saintly intercession. But your circular logic precludes you from believing in such miracles (i.e., since the saints can't hear us, these couldn't have been miracles).

Christ taught that you will know the true preachers of His doctrine by their fruits. As the Catholic Church is by far the largest and most universal Church on Earth, I'd say that God has blessed us pretty abundantly. Why would He bless us to such a degree if we've been angering Him by praying to His saints for all these years?
1,476 posted on 06/03/2008 11:10:42 AM PDT by Antoninus (John 6:54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1464 | View Replies]

To: mgist
Most Christians I have known are kind and positive, have I been too sheltered?

No, you have not been too sheltered. There is a vocal minority of anti-Catholic bigots, but it is a tiny minority among protestants. It's just that they labor under the yoke of a kind of mental defect, an obsessive anti-Catholic fetishism.

They should be pitied and remembered in our prayers.

1,477 posted on 06/03/2008 11:13:48 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1475 | View Replies]

To: mgist

P.S.: Know them by their fruits.


1,478 posted on 06/03/2008 11:15:11 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1475 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
But the Catholic Church began AD 32 at the Pentecost.

Why would the "Catholic Church" have been founded by Torah-observant Jews
on the YHvH commanded Feast of Shavuot
where the Law being given to Moses is celebrated ?

1,479 posted on 06/03/2008 11:15:43 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1460 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Why would the "Catholic Church" have been founded by Torah-observant Jews on the YHvH commanded Feast of Shavuot where the Law being given to Moses is celebrated ?

They believed Jesus was Christ. Thus they were Christians. They founded Christ's Church according to His command and instruction.

1,480 posted on 06/03/2008 11:17:55 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1479 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,441-1,4601,461-1,4801,481-1,500 ... 11,821-11,826 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson