Skip to comments.
SCOTUS strikes down Texas sodomy ban
FOXnews
Posted on 06/26/2003 7:08:23 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
SCOTUS sided with the perverts.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0amanreapswhathesews; 0bedroomkgb; 0godwillnotbemocked; 1aslimmeyslope; 1scrotus; 1slimmeyslope; 3branchesofgovt; activistcourt; activistsupremecourt; ageofconsentlaws; aides; aidesincreasetaxesup; aidesintheusa; aidesupinsuranceup; aidsalert; antibiblecountry; antichristiantrolls; antirelgiontrolls; antireligion; antireligionbigots; antireligiontroll; aregayapparel; arroganceofscotus; ascrotus; assthumpingidiots; biblethumpingmorons; biggovernmentcorrupt; bluenose; blueoyster; bohica; bowtothesecularstate; bowtothewelfarestate; bugger; buggered; buggerer; buggery; busybodieslose; buttpirate; buyvaselinestock; catsdogsmice; celebratesin; chickenlollipoppers; christianbashing; civilrights; clintonlegacy; constitutiontrashed; crazyfundies; culturewar; davidsouterisafaggot; deathoftheusa; deathofthewest; degeneracy; depravity; destructionofusa; devianceuptaxesup; deviantsex; donwenow; downourthroats; downwenoware; druglaws; endofcivilization; evilinactivistcourts; evilinrighttoprivacy; falalafalalalalala; falalalalalalalala; farkinqueers; fecalcontact; fools; fudgepackersdelight; fundiesinthecloset; fundyhysteria; gay; gayagenda; gayarrogance; gaybashing; gaycheese; gaycivlrights; gaydar; gaygestapo; gaykeywords; gaymafia; gaymarriage; gaymoose; gaynarcissist; gaypride; gayrights; gaysarevictimtoo; gayscelebrate; gaysholdusacaptive; gaysoutofcloset; gaysremakeamerica; gayssuppressthetruth; gaystapo; gaytrolldolls; gaytyrants; gayvote; getoutofmyroom; goawaymrsgrundy; godless; godsjudgement; godswrath; governmentschoolsex; hatecrimelegislation; himom; hitlerywins; homeschoolnow; homoapologists; homophobes; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexualagendawins; homosexualvote; hyperventilating; ihavearighttosin; ihaverights; incestlaws; indoctrination; itsjustsex; itsunatural; jeebuslovesgays; keywordwarsaregay; kitcheneducation; kneepadbrigade; lawrencevtexas; legislatinghate; legislatingsin; legislaturemakeslaws; lewinksys4all; lewinsky; lewinskys; liars; liberalagenda; libertariansareevil; libertines; lotsdaughters; lpcausesbo; makejeebuscry; manboylove; manboyloveassoc; manholeinspectorjoy; menwithmen; moralrelativism; moralrelativistinusa; msgrundypatrol; mycousinknowsclay; nambla; namblawillwinnext; onepercentrulesusa; oralsex; ourgayapparel; paulwellstone; pcdecision; pederasty; peepingtomgovt; perversion; perverts; preverts; prisoners; privacyprotection; prostitutionlaws; publichealthhazard; puritanslose; readtheconstitution; relgionbashing; religionbashing; romans1godswrath; rosieishappytoday; rosietypes; rumprangers; samesexdisorder; samesexmarriage; samesexmarriages; scotusknowsbest; scotusmakeslaw; scotustrumpsgodslaw; scotustrumpstate; scotustyranny; scrotus; sexeducation; sexindoctrination; sexpolice; sin; singlorified; slimmeyslope; slipperyslop; slipperyslope; slouching; slurpslurp; snitchonyourneighbor; sodomandgomorrah; sodomites; sodommites; sodomy; sodomylaw; sodomylaws; spyinthebushes; statesrights; stronginthesouth; supremecourt; swalloworspit; talibanintheusa; talibannedtrolls; texassodomylaw; thefunpolice; thegayelite; thegayvote; thisisevil; tisseasontobeunhappy; tistheseason; tobejolly; usathirdworldcountry; vicesnowvirtues; victimlesscrime; victimsofaids; victimsofhepatitus; weakinthehead; whatstatesright; womenwithwomen; zscrotus; zslimmeyslope; zzgoodruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 1,721-1,734 next last
To: Mister Magoo
Government needs to stay the hell out of the bedroom That's not exactly an earth-shattering concept.
It pains me to see how many people on this thread *think* they are for smaller Govt but disagree with the ruling.
401
posted on
06/26/2003 9:07:51 AM PDT
by
gdani
To: dead
The Bill of Rights overrules “democracy” in favor of individual rights. Libertarians support this concept, which you seem to have a problem with. The 'individual rights' that are listed in the Bill of Rights were voted on at one time, dead. They can be changed by...voting. If you believe that 'individual rights' are whatever you believe them to be, then that's another discussion entirely.
The thing that gives us 'individual rights' was voted on at one time.
402
posted on
06/26/2003 9:07:55 AM PDT
by
HumanaeVitae
(Catholic Epimethean)
To: MeeknMing
"They said it's not the state's business to categorize people in these ways," he said. A broad hint in advocacy of homo "marriage"
Comment #404 Removed by Moderator
To: Dead Corpse
I'm with Laz on this one. Libertarians are the root of all Evil. We are the reason Lucifer fell from grace. I, personally, pushed him.You understate the evil that is libertarianism.
Libertarians cause rust.
405
posted on
06/26/2003 9:08:52 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: MeeknMing
a decision that will have widespread effect on issues of personal privacy, as well as gay rights. Told ya. It will be seen as a gay rights issue when it isn't. Obviously, het couples in Texas only like the missionary position. /sarcasm
406
posted on
06/26/2003 9:08:52 AM PDT
by
rintense
(Thank you to all our brave soldiers, past and present, for your faithful service to our country.)
To: dead
It's the Libertarian's fault.
Everything is.
407
posted on
06/26/2003 9:09:42 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: The Red Zone
It did. It wasn't on equal protection basis. That's what surprises me. I can understand the logic that if one can consent to anal sex, it should not matter whther they are male or female. Equal Protection.
The Right to Privacy argument seems to me to be a bit off the mark, since the state can and does enforce all sorts of laws regarding sexual activities that are done "in private". I wonder how explicit the opinion was about explaining the limits.
To: gdani
It pains me to see how many people on this thread *think* they are for smaller Govt but disagree with the ruling. The truth is exactly the opposite. Look at the 'health care costs' in the city of Sin Freaksicko. Much of the public health costs in that city are driven by gays. It's a public health issue.
409
posted on
06/26/2003 9:10:09 AM PDT
by
HumanaeVitae
(Catholic Epimethean)
To: HumanaeVitae
The thing that gives us 'individual rights' was voted on at one time. Our rights come from a scrap of paper?
And our rights are granted by the state?
By vote?
And they can be voted away?
410
posted on
06/26/2003 9:11:10 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
When did the Bill of Rights change to give this protection to homosexuals and deny the state the power to make this law? Don't bother saying the Bill of Rights or any part of the Constitution means whatever you say. Your opinion is worthless.
The authors and ratifiers of the Constitution and it's amendments are only held in contempt by a few of you on this forum.
411
posted on
06/26/2003 9:11:41 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: Lazamataz
I shot JR.
412
posted on
06/26/2003 9:11:44 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: Lazamataz
The moose that bit my sister was a member of the LP.
413
posted on
06/26/2003 9:11:59 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(If you're interested in joining a FR list to discuss Big Brother 4 on CBS, please FReepmail me)
To: jmc813
Libertarians sure are bad people. Why, the other day, I took some food out of the fridge -- it was spoiled! Damned Libertarians!
414
posted on
06/26/2003 9:12:23 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: OWK
I shot JRYou must be a Libertarian, then.
415
posted on
06/26/2003 9:13:02 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
Comment #416 Removed by Moderator
To: HumanaeVitae
The 'individual rights' that are listed in the Bill of Rights were voted on at one time, dead. They can be changed by...voting. If you believe that 'individual rights' are whatever you believe them to be, then that's another discussion entirely. The thing that gives us 'individual rights' was voted on at one time.The Bill of Rights and the Federalist Papers explicitly state that the enumeration of Rights in the Constitution by no means limits the number of Rights we have. Also, they cannot be changed by "voting". They can only be changed by a Constitutional Convention (and the next one of those is going to be a terrifying event. The Left no longer cares about propriety, and will go after everything).
To: BlackjackHF
SC to usurp the powers constitutionally delegated to the legislature and impose its morality on us. In the same way 'doing nothing' is actually 'doing something', being 'neutral to morality' is actually 'not being neutral to morality'. Let paganism ring.
418
posted on
06/26/2003 9:13:32 AM PDT
by
HumanaeVitae
(Catholic Epimethean)
To: OWK
Oh, certainly our rights come from "reason."
The big question is: WHAT MAN'S "reason"?
To: Paradox
I wonder if he has been sodomizing the exhaust pipe...Libertarians do that. They are really bad people.
420
posted on
06/26/2003 9:14:52 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 1,721-1,734 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson