Skip to comments.
Dozens of women want Bronze Age hunter's babies
Ananova ^
| 4/24/03
Posted on 04/25/2003 10:35:13 AM PDT by SteveH
Dozens of women want Bronze Age hunter's babies
Dozens of women have asked to be made pregnant by a prehistoric iceman who died 5,000 years ago.
The body of "Otzi the Iceman" was discovered by hikers in 1991 as ice melted in the Schnalstal glacier, high in the Italian Alps.
Alex Susanna, director of the Bozen Museum where his body is exhibited, says requests have been received by many women wanting to have Otzi's babies.
He told Austrian broadcasting company ORF that all of the requests had been turned down, not least because Otzi's penis had decayed away.
Otzi was found half emerged from the ice and his body was first thought to be that of a modern climber. Closer examination showed he was still wearing goatskin leggings and a grass cape.
His copper-headed axe and a quiver full of arrows were found nearby and radio-carbon dating showed the body was more than 5,000 years old.
Story filed: 10:26 Thursday 24th April 2003
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: ancientautopsies; archaeology; babies; bronzeage; elvis; ggg; glacier; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; history; hunter; iceman; ivf; oetzi; otzi; sex; survivor; theiceman; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: LPStar
Sorry, I'm a billion behind in the count...
41
posted on
04/25/2003 1:04:09 PM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
(If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
To: Centurion2000
His last words to his friends, "I'm freezing my nads off out here."
To: SteveH
They'll change their tune when they realize how difficult it will be to extract support from him..
43
posted on
04/25/2003 1:06:29 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
(Sammy to Frodo: "Get out. Go sleep with one of your whores!")
To: Captain Rhino
These cells subsequently are implanted in the surrogate mother - who has no genetic connection to the resulting male offspring. Actually, if the donor ova are taken from the woman in whose body the conceptus will gestate, the resulting birth would be related genetically to the Mother, the donor, due to the prescence of mitochondrial DNA, at least! Your mitochondrial DNA comes down through the woman's side of the gene pool.
44
posted on
04/25/2003 1:11:37 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: scholar
"Closer examination showed he was still wearing goatskin leggings and a grass cape."I'm going to have to look into getting some of those leggings & a cape like that.
Sounds like one hellova come-on ploy to me if it's still working after 5,000 years?
... :^)
45
posted on
04/25/2003 1:16:40 PM PDT
by
Landru
To: Question_Assumptions
I believe his entire "package" is missing. I seem to recall that when he was first discovered in the Alps, there was a persistent rumor that a hiker (this later even morphed into a female hiker) had run off with the "package" before the mummy could be recovered by scientists for preservation and study in the lab...
46
posted on
04/25/2003 2:36:23 PM PDT
by
SteveH
To: MHGinTN
I am not a microbiologist, so I could be in error here.
My understanding of the procedure (from reading and watching what are said to be examples of the procedure on television) is that the entire contents of the egg are extracted. This would necessarily include the egg donor's mitochondrial DNA. Since the Ice Man's genetic material is a complete set of genes, it would, of course, contain his mother's mitochondrial DNA. But none of resulting individual's DNA would contain any of the egg donor's/surrogate mother's mitochondrial DNA. Consequently, my claim that the surrogate mother would have no genetic connection to the resulting male offspring.
This is not to say the surrogate mother has no biological connection to the child. After all, it would be her uterus that supported the child to term. As biological studies increasingly reveal, the physical, mental, and emotional health of the mother during pregnancy can have a dramatic impact on fetal development. Unfortunately, if she does everything right, the Ice Man genes would develop unaltered in the best possible prenatal environment. If she abuses drugs, alcohol, is exposed to hazardous chemicals/environments, is abused, in an accident, etc. she will impact the child and perhaps alter his genetic make-up; usually for the worst if past experience is any guide.
47
posted on
04/25/2003 2:37:59 PM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
(If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
To: Captain Rhino
The final question is ...why??
The Ice Man has little significance genetically since he is a modern human (Homo Sapiens Sapiens). There are presently about 4 billion of that particular genotype alive today. Further, since we already have his DNA to study, why would we need a living example? So, outside of the sheer notoriety, why would any woman want to have such a child - especially when the risk of abnormality is so high?
Why do (some) women throw themselves at sports stars? Why do (some) women throw themselves at convicted high-profile murderers? Why do (some) women throw themselves at (fill-in-the-outrageous-blank)?
There's no point in asking.
48
posted on
04/25/2003 2:43:22 PM PDT
by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Out dating other guys that they thought were more fun. On the bright side, though, you'll probably get to pay the child support for these kids......Barf. Please don't remind me...
49
posted on
04/25/2003 2:45:45 PM PDT
by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: Captain Rhino
Actually, only the nuclear material is removed ... it's calle enucleation ... then the nuclear material of the donor is inserted. But the mitochondrial DNA remains within the egg. Another method used prior to perfecting enucleation was to zap a donor cell alongside an enucleated (half the chromosome complement of a maturing ovum) ovum, and hope the two cells combine; lots of 'anomalies resulted'. Enucleation/insertion technique was called (may still be) 'the Hawaiian technique'.
50
posted on
04/25/2003 2:48:05 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: Chemist_Geek
I take your point concerning what Abbe Hoffman (I believe)annoyingly referred to as "hero f*****'s." It appears to be a way of counting coup for some women.
Now, how would you prove...
(*!! So that's why she never dry cleaned the blue dress !!*)
My concern was focused on the child because, in this particular case, the woman (surrogate mother) only gets to be famous if the child is born alive. And accompanying the birth is the moral responsibility for any abnormalities arising from the cloning.
51
posted on
04/25/2003 3:19:32 PM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
(If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
To: SteveH; Question_Assumptions
I seem to recall that when he was first discovered in the Alps, there was a persistent rumor that a hiker (this later even morphed into a female hiker) had run off with the "package" before the mummy could be recovered by scientists for preservation and study in the lab... According to an account I read (I think it was in Smithsonian, shortly after Ötzi was found), the police who were first on the scene, thinking he was a fairly recent death (one of a pair of hikers who had gone missing in 1934), hacked him out of the ice in a hurry with crowbars and a jackhammer and accidentally gave him the unkindest cut of all . . .
He's not all that well preserved, though, especially about the face he looks pretty grim. Tollund Man is in far better shape . . . his bones are brittle but except for his nose and left cheek being a little squished he looks like he just fell asleep . . . the Peat Bog Beauty Treatment. He's about 1,000 years younger though.
52
posted on
04/25/2003 3:31:19 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
To: MHGinTN
Thanks. I stand corrected.. The resulting child would have mitochondrial DNA from the donor egg/surrogate mother (assuming they are one in the same).
One follow-up question. And I know this will require quite a bit of speculation since no primates have been cloned to date. And certainly nothing from long dead material.
Since the Ice Man's nuclear material has to be undamaged, the cell source would have to have been protected from the effects of intracellular freezing. (A possible source that has been mentioned is the teeth.) These cells, even if intact and undamaged are ...well, to be blunt about it,...dead, long dead. Now dead DNA can be sequenced since the underlying chemistry remains the same. Wouldn't enucleation require living nuclear materials from the Ice Man to hold up their end of the reproductive process?
(I mean, after all, even Frankenstein's monster was made of fresh corpses! Sorry... couldn't resist the parallels in the zapping imagery.)
Ahem...to return to the topic, is there an extant culturing technique that could produce the needed Ice Man nuclear material? Or do we have to come up with a Critchen DNA sequencer (a la "Jurrasic Park")so that we can simply read out the dead DNA constituents and build a fresh copy for use in the cloning?
53
posted on
04/25/2003 3:58:17 PM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
(If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
To: Captain Rhino
In all seriousness, I don't know if the testes of the iceman were frozen and thus might contain viable sperm if thawed properly, and that's the only long 'shot' I see for these strange females to get there icing on the cake. (Well, not really seriously.)
54
posted on
04/25/2003 5:27:32 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: Tijeras_Slim
Thanks for thinking of me, but our DNA is likely incompatible...well that and the major visceral reaction I got simply by reading about these looney broads. Yuk! :^)
55
posted on
04/25/2003 11:16:51 PM PDT
by
Aracelis
To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; ...
56
posted on
04/27/2006 9:45:20 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Thanks for the ping. It's almost as good as the orgasmic nasal spray from last week.
Well....;o]
57
posted on
04/27/2006 9:49:37 AM PDT
by
Monkey Face
(I can resist anything but temptation.)
To: SteveH
all of the requests had been turned down, not least because Otzi's penis had decayed away. I hate it when that happens.
58
posted on
04/27/2006 9:50:42 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(Posting snarky comments so you don't have to)
To: jwfiv; TheBigB
59
posted on
04/27/2006 10:10:36 AM PDT
by
Serb5150
(Christ is risen! Indeed He is risen!)
To: SteveH
Wouldn't his bronze age sperm be freezer burnt?
60
posted on
04/27/2006 10:16:07 AM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson