Skip to comments.
DOJ can 'force' Alito, Thomas to recuse themselves on SCOTUS cases: Dem lawmaker
Fox News ^
| May 30, 2024
| Lindsay Kornick
Posted on 05/30/2024 9:34:38 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
Top Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin argued in the New York Times this week that Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito could, in theory, be forced to step down from cases related to the January 6 Capitol riots.
In a guest essay for the New York Times on Wednesday, Raskin detailed ways Thomas and Alito could be forced to recuse themselves from the upcoming Trump v. United States and Fischer v. United States, both involving former President Trump's role during the Capitol protests.
"Of course, Justices Alito and Thomas could choose to recuse themselves — wouldn’t that be nice? But begging them to do the right thing misses a far more effective course of action," Raskin wrote.
Alito and Thomas, both nominated by Republican presidents and part of the Supreme Court's conservative wing, have come under fire from Democrats and mainstream media in recent months over claims that they cannot objectively rule on matters around Jan. 6.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 000001absurd; arrestjamieraskin; congress; despotism; doj; forcedrecuse; ips; j6; jamieraskin; marcusraskin; mentallyleft; raskin; readtheconstitution; recuse; reddiaperbaby; russianagent; scotus; separationofpowers; tampering; weaponizeddoj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
I never believed Kagan had no interaction with Obamacare before her SCOTUS appointment, it was not plausible. I still think repubs need to force investigation into that.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I just have to say, “Bullspit!”
Have none of these people ever heard of the separation of powers?
The executive branch cannot force the judicial branch to neuter itself.
Where do these idiots come from?
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Raskin makes me root for cancer.
3
posted on
05/30/2024 9:38:45 PM PDT
by
Dr.Deth
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Seperation of powers dude!
4
posted on
05/30/2024 9:39:30 PM PDT
by
antceecee
( )
To: where's_the_Outrage?
It doesn’t work like that. SCOTUS justices decide for themselves if they should recuse themselves from a case, unlike oher federal judges. This won’t happen, but they are desperate.
5
posted on
05/30/2024 9:39:43 PM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: where's_the_Outrage?
They’re trying to destroy separation of powers.
To: Dr.Deth
Shouldn’t there be some way to prosecute Raskin for leaving out exculpatory evidence in the J6 Committee’s report?
These critters are so so so so slimy. It’s about time they got their just rewards.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
So, who died and put Jamie Raskin in charge of the Department of Insanity???
8
posted on
05/30/2024 9:44:06 PM PDT
by
Oscar in Batangas
(An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
He’s even dumber and more fascist than I thought.
9
posted on
05/30/2024 9:44:50 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The Dems are running on high-octane steroids.
After screwing Trump, they now have the blueprint for going after any Conservative they choose.
And RINO’s (Republicrats) sit back and do nothing.
10
posted on
05/30/2024 9:45:42 PM PDT
by
Herodes
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The Rats are taking care of all family business.
11
posted on
05/30/2024 9:46:10 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Alito and Thomas, both nominated by Republican presidents and part of the Supreme Court's conservative wing, have come under fire from Democrats and mainstream media in recent months over claims that they cannot objectively rule on matters around Jan. 6..... but Merchan was totally objective about Trump. Right?
12
posted on
05/30/2024 9:50:00 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(If they can do this to TRUMP, they can do this to YOU.)
To: Lazamataz
It’s all about power. Constitutionalism means NOTHING to these people.
13
posted on
05/30/2024 9:51:45 PM PDT
by
TheConservator
(To bar Trump from the presidency, libtards are happy to trash 235 years the rule of law)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
DOJ can do NOTHING to force Alito and Thomas to recuse. Seperation of Powers. Another donk with maggot larvae chewing on brain cells
14
posted on
05/30/2024 9:52:01 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
To: Dr.Deth
The chemo has poisoned his mind.
15
posted on
05/30/2024 9:55:48 PM PDT
by
Macho MAGA Man
(The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
To: butterdezillion
They come from the place where Antonin Scalia perished at a time most convenient for the left.
I don’t know if you’ve noticed yet, but the left has reached the conclusion that they can do anything they want without consequence. Nobody’s holding them accountable in any fashion, so unless that changes or the words leap off the Constitution to stop them, are they wrong?
16
posted on
05/30/2024 9:57:15 PM PDT
by
No.6
To: BigEdLB
DOJ can do NOTHING to force Alito and Thomas to recuse.
Correct. If there were truly something egregious, the House could impeach and the Senate could remove them. That is the check on SCOTUS abuse.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
My God, these people have become so brazen.
18
posted on
05/30/2024 9:57:49 PM PDT
by
cld51860
("This business will get out of control...")
To: Lazamataz
"Alito and Thomas, both nominated by Republican presidents and part of the Supreme Court's conservative wing, have come under fire from Democrats and mainstream media in recent months over claims that they cannot objectively rule on matters around Jan. 6."
Does that not imply that the Supreme Court's liberal/pigressive wing should do the same?
19
posted on
05/30/2024 9:58:39 PM PDT
by
clearcarbon
(Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I wish republicans had just 1/10th the political savy Democrats have.
20
posted on
05/30/2024 9:58:40 PM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(Sadly,a ranchers right to shoot their dog is a bigger issue to conservatives than Christian rights.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson