Posted on 04/24/2022 7:16:30 PM PDT by conservative98
Fox News host Mark Levin explained what "America first" means to him, Sunday, by debunking the notion that our founders were "nationalists."
The "Life, Liberty & Levin" host said how the word "nationalist" cannot be found in our founding documents because the founders and framers "believed in Americanism," guided by "natural law and rights," not nationalism" or "populism."
"The Tenth Amendment rejects nationalism. It’s federalism. Talks about state sovereignty. Why do we have a Ninth Amendment? Have you read that one lately? It talks about individual liberty, it is in my view, a reflection of the Declaration. They put it right there in the Ninth Amendment. That is your protection. Nationalism strikes me as an all powerful, centralized federal government. Right? I am not a nationalist."
"There’s a fusion there. The one outright hates the country, the American Marxist, trying to destroy it from within. The other says ‘I love the country so much, we have to isolate it from everything and everything else.’ Really?" he explained.
Instead, Levin argued, "America first" means responding to global atrocities like Russia's war with Ukraine, to stop another world war from happening.
"America means embracing capitalism but not selling to the enemy or giving to the enemy weapons they will sure as hell use against us… And Americanism means to me when you see mass graves in Ukraine, now, 9,000, when you see people being slaughtered by a monster and a war machine that is imperialistic, that if they have their way … will light the fuse with its allies in communist China in terrorist Iran, in North Korea … really creating a true world war."
"America first doesn't mean putting your head in the sand and pretending otherwise. You want to protect your children from war? You stand up now," he urged.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Then, after Trump was elected he jumped on the Trump money train.
Then the little bastard, hypocrite, self proclaimed protector of the Constitution clammed up (with Fox News) Nov.2020 on election fraud. And has been silent on it since...How do I know? Fox hasn't fired him yet.
You bet, Levin is a Johnny come lately.
.
Levin backed Glenn Beck over Trump when Beck compared Trump to Hitler and Trump supporters to Nazis.
Remember when Obama slipped, and said, look whatever happens, my kids are going to be fine.
That’s where Levin is coming from, let the little people pay for it.
He got his, screw the middle class.
.
The problem with aid is that it never stops. The foreign welfare pimpers never can stop with this madness. Welfare destroys. Europe refused to arm and prepare because of our foreign welfare. They cut their own throats cutting back on their defenses and the rest.
This is my read on it and also my position which can be summed up simply like this:
1. Do not appease Putin
2. Do not send US forces to Ukraine
3. Do send weapons and supplies to Ukraine
Here come the NeoCons.
.
Levin yelling isn’t appealing.
How is it going to be paid for Levin?
Not by your accountants. We don’t have the book scam you do. His books are rehashed summarizations that any college kid can write.
.
American first aDOES NOT MEAN BEING THE WORLD’S FREE MILITARY SERVICE.
That is the plan. And it is working. Once the plan is complete. They will use the same tactics on the useful idiots to get rid of them. Gotta cull the herd. They are no longer useful and will be a liability.
NeoCon mouthpiece.
When did Levin serve?
Constellis, formerly Blackwater, is paying mercs.
He and his entire family should sign up.
The dangerous ideology is globalism, the notion that you can and should over-ride culture and the nation state built on culture in the name of global "democracy" run by a bunch of marxo-fascist elites who think they have the power to cancel people who don't believe in whatever perversion that globalists are pushing.
We are on the brink of nuclear war because of that and yet can't stop ourselves.
Levin thinks he knows better than both George Washington and Dwight D. Eisnhower.
The way I see it is we should follow the emBASEee strategee. Very AmericaFirsty.
The Budapest Agreement was an “accession” to a signed international United Nations, ratified nuclear nonproliferation treaty. The Ukes honored it and gave up those nukes. The Rukes violated it twice by invading twice, by happenstance it was when there were weak-kneed democrap presidents in office whom Vlad knew would not do anything about an invasion. And the USA has been looking for all kinds of ways to abrogate our responsibility in this treaty/agreement even though it points to disaster down the road for nuclear nonproliferation.
So when I say give back the Ukes their nukes, it is an acknowledgement that nukes are sovereignty. They gave up some nukes in exchange for “assurances” for borders and sovereignty. Since they are in an existential war, who are we to scold them for building nukes since that is what we did when we were in our existential war, and we are the ones who have betrayed them.
If the Ukes develop and deploy a suitcase nuke on a Russian city, it is because they got pushed into an existential corner. What we really should be doing is putting CONVENTIONAL forces into this fight in a way that genuinely “assures” borders and sovereignty for a country that did the right thing. After all, the Russian bear has been shown to be rather toothless compared to what most of us thought they would be in this fight, so the US would kick some serious @$$.
And if we send in American boots on the ground, we damned well better be negotiating American Land as the thing to fight for. Big, sweeping American EmBASEees along the border between Russia and Ukraine. A Lend Lease project. Americans fighting for American land. For generations we could use that land to build airports and fight terrorism in that region. I would call it the BBudapest AAgreement LLend LLease program because it would take BALLs.
from my home page
I have been advocating for several years a policy I call ‘embaseees’. Embassy + AirBase —> EmBASEeees. We go into a terrorist country, clear out their taliban equivalent, then withdraw to very large Embassies, perhaps 3 of them. Have them big enough to encompass a military airbase where we can use it for decades on end to conduct anti-terrorism operations. As long as the ‘host’ country aint killing Americans then we let them have self-sovereignty. Kind of like how we operated in the Phillipines for decades. We could even have an intermediate zone that we patrol but it would be autonomous. Let them have their taste of freedom. A referendum every 10 years to see how large the boundaries of the intermediate autonomous zone should be.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4043681/posts
__________________________________________________________
Why do I now get the sense that Hunter Biden’s laptop has some images of Mark Levin and Hunter taking a bubble bath together?
It does always seem to wind up that those who scream the loudest for Ukraine have a personal stake in it.
For example, there’s a zealous Ukraine defender in this thread who has admitted they know Zelenskyy personally.
Actual Americans don’t care.
Well said.
Levin comes on like a great Constitutional scholar, then cherry-picks the parts he likes to support his neo-con views.
For fun, lets’s make a list of countries to which the US gives money. Then let us go down the list and identify those we consider to be enemies. One thing the constitution is pretty clear about is treason, and I don’t think it would be hard to find two witnesses who will testify.
Now let the Not So Great One analyze his demands in light of Article III, Section 3, Clause 1.
These conservative influencers are always late to the party whether its globalism, pushing free trade, or border security first before any foreign interventions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.