Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just 7% Of Our DNA Is Unique To Modern Humans, Study Shows
Phys.org ^ | 7-16-2021

Posted on 07/17/2021 5:51:13 PM PDT by blam

This Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2003 file photo shows a reconstructed Neanderthal skeleton, right, and a modern human skeleton on display at the Museum of Natural History in New York.

What makes humans unique? Scientists have taken another step toward solving an enduring mystery with a new tool that may allow for more precise comparisons between the DNA of modern humans and that of our extinct ancestors.

Just 7% of our genome is uniquely shared with other humans, and not shared by other early ancestors, according to a study published Friday in the journal Science Advances.

"That's a pretty small percentage," said Nathan Schaefer, a University of California computational biologist and co-author of the new paper. "This kind of finding is why scientists are turning away from thinking that we humans are so vastly different from Neanderthals."

The research draws upon DNA extracted from fossil remains of now-extinct Neanderthals and Denisovans dating back to around 40,000 or 50,000 years ago, as well as from 279 modern people from around the world.

Scientists already know that modern people share some DNA with Neanderthals, but different people share different parts of the genome. One goal of the new research was to identify the genes that are exclusive to modern humans.

It's a difficult statistical problem, and the researchers "developed a valuable tool that takes account of missing data in the ancient genomes," said John Hawks, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, who was not involved in the research.

The researchers also found that an even smaller fraction of our genome—just 1.5%—is both unique to our species and shared among all people alive today. Those slivers of DNA may hold the most significant clues as to what truly distinguishes modern human beings.

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: denisivans; denisovans; dna; fauxiantroll; fauxiantrolls; helixmakemineadouble; humans; neandertal; neandertals; neanderthal; neanderthals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
"The findings underscore "that we're actually a very young species," said Akey. "Not that long ago, we shared the planet with other human lineages."
1 posted on 07/17/2021 5:51:13 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Read the bible


2 posted on 07/17/2021 5:53:56 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

It’s the little things that mean the most! :)


3 posted on 07/17/2021 5:54:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who shot Ashli Babbitt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I share NO DNA with Democrats. Did we each get 3.5%? Or is their 7% completely different from my 7%. How does this work?


4 posted on 07/17/2021 5:57:40 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Criminal democrats kill babies, folks. Do you think anything else is a problem for them?” ~ joma89)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Lib types tend to share more of their DNA with snakes than people, IMO.


5 posted on 07/17/2021 6:00:31 PM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (Ceterum autem censeo Justinius True-dope-us esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

we share 60% with a banana

https://thednatests.com/how-much-dna-do-humans-share-with-other-animals/

but then it is science.


6 posted on 07/17/2021 6:06:00 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

This would mean a lot more to me if I knew exactly how Neanderthals behaved and what they were capable of. How complex was their language. Could they learn modern languages? or to read? or to argue philosophy?
If we could possibly know that about the 5 or so humanoid species thought to still be alive 100,000 years ago then we could place numbers like this in context.


7 posted on 07/17/2021 6:12:59 PM PDT by conejo99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Uhhh that’s an extremely large %.


8 posted on 07/17/2021 6:14:34 PM PDT by Levy78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

But wait... I was always told that our DNA is 98.5% identical to chimpanzees. Or is that argument no longer useful?


9 posted on 07/17/2021 6:19:18 PM PDT by fluffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’m not related to that guy!


10 posted on 07/17/2021 6:37:49 PM PDT by 9422WMR (45 1. Lie, cheat, steal. It’s how the democRATS operate. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"What makes humans unique?"

We are made in the image of our creator.

11 posted on 07/17/2021 6:46:09 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("You'll never hear surf music again" - J. Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluffy

“But wait... I was always told that our DNA is 98.5% identical to chimpanzees. Or is that argument no longer useful?”

Given that 1.5% is unique to man, 98.5% might not be too far off.

“The researchers also found that an even smaller fraction of our genome—just 1.5%—is both unique to our species and shared among all people alive today.”


12 posted on 07/17/2021 6:51:01 PM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

negative, I am a meat popsicle


13 posted on 07/17/2021 6:55:59 PM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I think you misread that, 1.5% is unique to man and still identical across all living men. There is still that extra 5.5% that is unique to man but varies a bit across races and individuals.
14 posted on 07/17/2021 7:05:27 PM PDT by fluffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fluffy

But wait... I was always told that our DNA is 98.5% identical to chimpanzees. Or is that argument no longer useful?
\/

Depends on what day of the week it is for darwinists and or media.

Or what research grant is running out of cash.

Settled science and such.


15 posted on 07/17/2021 7:09:00 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

Just 7% of our genome is uniquely shared with other humans, and not shared by other early ancestors…

93% of the DNA in a jellyfish can be found in the GOP members of Congress.


16 posted on 07/17/2021 7:11:04 PM PDT by Flick Lives (“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I smell Fauxiganda here.


17 posted on 07/17/2021 7:29:29 PM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

That’s a fact, Jack.


18 posted on 07/17/2021 7:44:27 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam
Don't you make a monkey out of me!
19 posted on 07/17/2021 7:52:39 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluffy

“But wait... I was always told that our DNA is 98.5% identical to chimpanzees. Or is that argument no longer useful?”

Studies a decade ago put the number at about 88%.


20 posted on 07/17/2021 8:15:50 PM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson