Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From 2009: EPA Formally Declares CO2 a Dangerous Pollutant
THeDailySignal ^ | 12/7/09 | nicolas loris

Posted on 01/23/2017 7:17:46 AM PST by central_va

Step aside, elected Members of Congress. If you can’t pass cap and trade legislation, The Environmental Protection Agency will move in with massively complex and costly regulations that would micromanage just about every aspect of the economy. They announced today that carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases (GHGs) threaten public health and the environment.

Since 85 percent of the U.S. economy runs on fossil fuels that emit carbon dioxide, imposing a cost on CO2 is equivalent to placing an economy-wide tax on energy use. The kind of industrial-strength EPA red tape that the agency could enforce in the name of global warming would result in millions of dollars in compliance costs. These are unnecessary costs that businesses will inevitably pass on to the American consumer, slow economic growth and kill jobs. Although the crafted rules say only facilities that emit 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year or more will be affected, businesses fear the exemption may not hold up in court and could now be imposed on many smaller commercial buildings, farms, restaurants, churches and small businesses.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: c02; capntrade; epa; first100days; trump45; trumpenvironment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
This is from 2009 but I believe reversing this regulation is the key to de fanging the EPA.

Yes… The shadow government moves in to accomplish what the real government cannot bring about, the subjugation of the American people under the watchful eye of Big Brother.

The United Nations is not a peace organization and the EPA is not an environmental one…

1 posted on 01/23/2017 7:17:46 AM PST by central_va
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: central_va

Everyone STOP EXHALING RIGHT NOW! You are expelling CO2 and killing the polar bears! We’re all gonna die!


2 posted on 01/23/2017 7:20:49 AM PST by Awgie (Truth is always stranger than fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Good point. Hopefully the landing team there is right on it.


3 posted on 01/23/2017 7:21:07 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

This provable lie must be scientifically denounced.

CO2 is clearly a building block of life and NOT a pollutant.


4 posted on 01/23/2017 7:21:17 AM PST by G Larry (Pretending Podesta's e-mail are "The American Election System" is nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
"This is from 2009..."

Got it.

5 posted on 01/23/2017 7:21:21 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The ‘executive’ that signed off on this edict should be hunted down and quartered.


6 posted on 01/23/2017 7:21:51 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The EPA needs to be salted down, fed feet first through a plastic shredder, and scattered to the four winds.


7 posted on 01/23/2017 7:22:21 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
C02 is a nutrient not a pollutant.
8 posted on 01/23/2017 7:22:25 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
EPA Formally Declares CO2 a Dangerous Pollutant

Time to fire everyone associated with making this declaration.

9 posted on 01/23/2017 7:22:32 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

CO2 is NOT a toxic gas any more than O2 is a toxic gas. Both are necessary for life on this planet.

Co2 is the life blood for vegetation of all kinds, whereas O2 is needed for animated life.

Since this is from the EPA, I think Trump’s incoming EPA chief could rewrite the piece so that it is sensible.


10 posted on 01/23/2017 7:22:33 AM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Asshat...


11 posted on 01/23/2017 7:22:38 AM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

Breathe in.............


12 posted on 01/23/2017 7:23:05 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va
IMHO, the EPA is the biggest threat to the environment that I am aware of.
13 posted on 01/23/2017 7:23:07 AM PST by Perseverando (For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The best use of CO2 (aside from keeping our vegetation alive) is to bottle some up and place ALL EPA science pretenders in a room with it.

That’s as in “only” the CO2.

We can televise the results.

It’ll be top rated.


14 posted on 01/23/2017 7:23:19 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Dangerous?

How about “Criteria Pollutant” as define by the US Congress?
No law, no regulation!


15 posted on 01/23/2017 7:23:24 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
The United Nations is not a peace organization and the EPA is not an environmental one!

(It deserved repeating)

16 posted on 01/23/2017 7:23:28 AM PST by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional

Whose the asshat?


17 posted on 01/23/2017 7:23:57 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

Why worry about the polar bears? They also exhale CO2. Should we want them to increase?/s


18 posted on 01/23/2017 7:24:02 AM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

ATTENTION TRUMP: CLEANUP IN AISLE E


19 posted on 01/23/2017 7:24:49 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

imagine the world without a single tree, and what are we supposed to eat?


20 posted on 01/23/2017 7:25:17 AM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson