This is from 2009 but I believe reversing this regulation is the key to de fanging the EPA.
Yes
The shadow government moves in to accomplish what the real government cannot bring about, the subjugation of the American people under the watchful eye of Big Brother.
The United Nations is not a peace organization and the EPA is not an environmental one
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: central_va
Everyone STOP EXHALING RIGHT NOW! You are expelling CO2 and killing the polar bears! We’re all gonna die!
2 posted on
01/23/2017 7:20:49 AM PST by
Awgie
(Truth is always stranger than fiction.)
To: central_va
Good point. Hopefully the landing team there is right on it.
To: central_va
This provable lie must be scientifically denounced.
CO2 is clearly a building block of life and NOT a pollutant.
4 posted on
01/23/2017 7:21:17 AM PST by
G Larry
(Pretending Podesta's e-mail are "The American Election System" is nonsense.)
To: central_va
"This is from 2009..." Got it.
5 posted on
01/23/2017 7:21:21 AM PST by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective...)
To: central_va
The ‘executive’ that signed off on this edict should be hunted down and quartered.
6 posted on
01/23/2017 7:21:51 AM PST by
Gaffer
To: central_va
The EPA needs to be salted down, fed feet first through a plastic shredder, and scattered to the four winds.
7 posted on
01/23/2017 7:22:21 AM PST by
SpaceBar
To: central_va
C02 is a nutrient not a pollutant.
8 posted on
01/23/2017 7:22:25 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
EPA Formally Declares CO2 a Dangerous Pollutant Time to fire everyone associated with making this declaration.
9 posted on
01/23/2017 7:22:32 AM PST by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: central_va
CO2 is NOT a toxic gas any more than O2 is a toxic gas. Both are necessary for life on this planet.
Co2 is the life blood for vegetation of all kinds, whereas O2 is needed for animated life.
Since this is from the EPA, I think Trump’s incoming EPA chief could rewrite the piece so that it is sensible.
10 posted on
01/23/2017 7:22:33 AM PST by
Gumdrop
To: central_va
To: central_va
IMHO, the EPA is the biggest threat to the environment that I am aware of.
13 posted on
01/23/2017 7:23:07 AM PST by
Perseverando
(For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
To: central_va
The best use of CO2 (aside from keeping our vegetation alive) is to bottle some up and place ALL EPA science pretenders in a room with it.
That’s as in “only” the CO2.
We can televise the results.
It’ll be top rated.
To: central_va
Dangerous?
How about “Criteria Pollutant” as define by the US Congress?
No law, no regulation!
15 posted on
01/23/2017 7:23:24 AM PST by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: central_va
The United Nations is not a peace organization and the EPA is not an environmental one!(It deserved repeating)
16 posted on
01/23/2017 7:23:28 AM PST by
Baynative
( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
To: central_va
ATTENTION TRUMP: CLEANUP IN AISLE E
To: central_va
EPA to America: Turn your head and cough!
21 posted on
01/23/2017 7:25:18 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
Oxygen also is dangerous to the environment. Among other things, its presence leads to disastrous conflagrations and explosions.
To: central_va
It seems as if the “SWAMP” is emitting noxious gasses regardless of who is president. “Drain it”!
27 posted on
01/23/2017 7:36:17 AM PST by
Don Corleone
(.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
To: central_va; All
"Step aside, elected Members of Congress." Wait a minute !
Noting that this post is before my first coffee, isnt global warming skeptic Donald Trump now POTUS? Then why is Trump seemingly letting corrupt, state-sovereignty-ignoring Congress get away with allowing EPA to get away with stealing state powers to make unconstitutional decisions like this, as if Obama is still pres.?
To: central_va
Cause millions of dollars in additional costs?
That statement has to be off by at least a factor of a thousand.
29 posted on
01/23/2017 7:37:36 AM PST by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson