Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan Preparing For Potential HAND RECOUNT of 4.8M Presidential Votes (facepalm)
Wn.com ^ | 7:10 p.m. EST November 25, 2016 | Kathleen Gray , Detroit Free Press Lansing Bureau

Posted on 11/26/2016 5:51:28 PM PST by drewh

The Green Party is crowdfunding $2.5 million to challenge the 2016 election results in three states. Video provided by Newsy Newslook

"What we're doing is standing up for an election system that we can trust. We deserve to have votes that we can believe in,"

(Excerpt) Read more at article.wn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; 2016swingstates; election; jillstein; mi2016; michigan; recount; stein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321 next last
To: All

I don’t know anything about dollars raised or what it is for. I DO know that the Michigan GOP asked for volunteers and I volunteered. Stein has to come with buku $$$ for fees to be paid to the states for the challenges.


201 posted on 11/26/2016 7:29:39 PM PST by madison10 (Almost disenfranchised Michigander.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

That’s kinda sad.. 1876 seems to have been an interesting year for electors too.

BUT the states appointed them and they voted.
New York in 1789 is the only case I’ve found of a state not appointing it’s electors.


202 posted on 11/26/2016 7:31:27 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65

It’s ALL Soros money!


203 posted on 11/26/2016 7:31:44 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
In PA and MI, her petition will have to convince a court.

When Obama struck a conciliatory tone about the incoming Trump administration the other day, I knew something was up.

Watch them find courts that will allow both recounts to proceed.

204 posted on 11/26/2016 7:34:29 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

the only stategy i see here is the longshot faithless elector. or they are buying time and hoping for more ‘fraud’ to show up in other states..


205 posted on 11/26/2016 7:37:12 PM PST by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: dsm69
A hand recount will not be done before the electors are to meet.

That's precisely the point. If the recall isn't complete, the state's electors will be thrown out, thus lowering Trump's total electoral count.

If they can do that in WI, MI, and PA, Trump will have less than the required 270, thus throwing the election to the House of Representatives.

At least that's the plan.

Per the Constitution, all he needs is a majority of "the electors present" to win on December 19th.

206 posted on 11/26/2016 7:40:13 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Has anyone figured out why this is actually going on?

Trump won Pennsylvania by over 70,000 votes. That one isn't going to change.

If the other two could even be overturned it would not be enough to alter the outcome.

I don't get it.

My take on this is the Dems know they can't find the votes to flip these states. They have enough people running the counts in the liberal precincts to just delay the count past 13 Dec. At that point those states lose their Electoral Votes.

207 posted on 11/26/2016 7:40:32 PM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Yes, but an air dropped bomb or hellfire missile would likely totally destroy a gun owners home with one shot. The real issue is how loyal the military is to the Federal Government and corrupt politicians that they would or would not carry out unconstitutional actions against American citizens. The real danger is that peer pressure from fellow soldiers and pressure from Commanding Officers, who can be allied with either side of the political spectrum, in any military should never be underestimated.


208 posted on 11/26/2016 7:44:27 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

Do the Dumbocrats even see the hypocrisy in this strategy??? The party that demands that “every vote counts” wants to erase the votes from three states. In essence making those votes “not count”!


209 posted on 11/26/2016 7:44:54 PM PST by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

Well, that’s a nice way to piss me off against the Democrats for totally removing my state’s voice from the electoral college altogether. If they do that, then it becomes real obvious who would be considered more corrupt and more dangerous.


210 posted on 11/26/2016 7:45:39 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“If the recall isn’t complete, the state’s electors will be thrown out”
LOL!
By whom?
The Republican congress?


211 posted on 11/26/2016 7:46:46 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
... but on June 6, 2005, Judge John E. Bridges ruled that the Republican party did not provide enough evidence that the disputed votes were ineligible—or for whom they were cast—to overturn the election.

This is an important point to remember. Even documented evidence of massive numbers of people voting illegally in an election is not likely to support a challenge to an election result. The simple reason for this is that votes are cast anonymously, so there's really no way to tell -- unless you have sworn affidavits from people who voted telling you who they voted for -- which candidate received the illegal votes.

212 posted on 11/26/2016 7:47:01 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I live here and it has not been on our local news.


213 posted on 11/26/2016 7:47:48 PM PST by MarMema (thank you President elect Trump for all you have done!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: drewh

In other words, the top leaders will each get a 2nd or 3rd house from the sucker donors.


214 posted on 11/26/2016 7:47:52 PM PST by Mark (Celebrities... is there anything they do not know.? -Homer Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Wisconsin may be the easiest of the three to get a recount, but I assume they picked it first because it had the earliest deadline for a recount petition (yesterday).


215 posted on 11/26/2016 7:48:51 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: madison10
I DO know that the Michigan GOP asked for volunteers and I volunteered.

So did we. But I have very little hope that a recount here would be done in time.

216 posted on 11/26/2016 7:49:38 PM PST by MarMema (thank you President elect Trump for all you have done!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

“At that point those states lose their Electoral Votes. “
Unless the state legislature does it’s duty and appoints the electors.

I say with confidence that no state has failed to appoint electors since 1789. That would be quite an accomplishment for one to fail so miserably now.


217 posted on 11/26/2016 7:50:11 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
PA Superior Court is a statewide court and is the only one they can "find." PA law requires the petition be filed with "an appeals court." That means either Superior Court, The Commonwealth Court, or the State Supreme Court. The Commonwealth Court does not deal with voter issues, and the State Supreme Court would not be the first court of appeal.

To order a statewide recount, they must present prima facie evidence of fraud, or evidence that irregularities are so pervasive as to substantively alter the result of the election.

218 posted on 11/26/2016 7:51:13 PM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer
They have enough people running the counts in the liberal precincts to just delay the count past 13 Dec. At that point those states lose their Electoral Votes.

Not so.

If the count cannot be certified on December 13, as require by the constitution, the state legislature is empowered to appoint their own slate of electors to cast their EVs when the Electoral College meets on December 19.

Inasmuch as both houses of the state legislatures in all three states are controlled by Republicans, Trump will not be denied any EVs.

219 posted on 11/26/2016 7:51:16 PM PST by okie01 ( The MainStream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

“It makes no sense just to hold since no one actually knows what their end game is.”

They probably will file counter petitions in all three states because it appears that then both parties have to go before a court (or some para-judicial body) and explain the reasons for filing their petitions. For Trump it’s simple since he “sees” no evidence of vote fraud and wants the current results to be certified as true. OTOH Stein has to show her “evidence’ of fraud and since all she has is some pie in the sky computer models that fly in the face of the real election data, she will loose.


220 posted on 11/26/2016 7:52:04 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson