Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

Wisconsin may be the easiest of the three to get a recount, but I assume they picked it first because it had the earliest deadline for a recount petition (yesterday).


215 posted on 11/26/2016 7:48:51 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
No, they picked it first because there's a sucker born every minute and they had to pretend to be doing something to keep the money flowing.

There is no reason in the world why they could not have started the process of petitioning the Courts in MI and PA before the weekend. They haven't filed in either state, and they don't even promise the money raised will be used for the recount effort. Why not?

231 posted on 11/26/2016 8:02:37 PM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson