Posted on 10/12/2016 4:36:31 PM PDT by Red Badger
Today Wikileaks released what is, by far, the most devastating leak of the entire campaign. This makes Trump’s dirty talk video looks like an episode of Barney and Friends.
Even though when Trump called Hillary the ‘founder’ of ISIS he was telling the truth and 100% accurate, the media has never stopped ripping him apart over it.
Today the media is forced to eat their hats because the newest batch of leaked emails show Hillary, in her own words, admitting to doing just that, funding and running ISIS.
John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign chair, who was also a counselor to President Obama at the time, was the recipient of the 2014 email which was released today.
Assange promised his latest batch of leaks would lead to the indictment of Hillary, and it looks like he was not kidding. The email proves Hillary knew and was complicit in the funding and arming of ISIS by our ‘allies’ Saudi Arabia and Qatar!
The media is yet to report on this, even though Wikileaks has a 10 year history of being 100% accurate in their leaks, never once releasing info that proved to be false.
…Can you guess why?
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that The Saudi’s brag about funding 20% of Hillary’s Presidential campaign, and along with Qatar, are among the largest donors to the CLINTON FOUNDATION.
Is it any mystery now why ISIS has flourished under the Obama/Clinton administration? The United States has created armed and funded the terrorists overthrowing Syria via our Terrorist State allies. When you know this it makes you look at the situation in Syria differently. Perhaps Russia and Iran are the ones fighting ISIS, it stands to reason once you know we are fighting Russia, and at the same time arming ISIS.
Clinton’s campaign and her Clinton Foundation are literally funded by the SAME PEOPLE who are funding ISIS and killing hundreds of thousands of innocents in the Middle East, and now, even here at home.
This is nothing short of TREASON. Hillary must be sent to trial and held accountable for crimes against humanity and Treason against the United States of America.
We know the media will do all in their power to bury this story so it is up to us to use social media to make sure every voter in America knows this before they cast their vote for president on Nov 8th. You know what to do …
‘Hillary will claim the Russians made the whole thing up ...’
But the media knows that people respect wikileaks more than them. That is why the old media rarely [if ever] disputes wikileaks — too accurate a track record.
So the headline was too sensational?
Overstated?
On post 4 that really looks like Chris Stevens there.
‘What matters in my mind is that the Saudi and Qatari goverments who supported Islamic State, supported Hillary Clinton through the Clinton Foundation.’
I agree. Saudis and Qatar want a natural gas pipeline through Syria. For that to happen they need to take down Assad. And they are Hillary’s bestest money-buddies.
This might have been over-hyped. I’m waiting for response.
FRegards ....
For Debate #3 - I would like to see The Donald press all of Hillary’s buttons to the point where she loses it on live TV.
I’m just curious here, and perhaps playing a bit of devil’s advocate (though not really)..... It’s clear to me reading this that she KNEW that Qatar and Saudi were funding ISIS, but where does this show that she is “complicit”?
Everyone knows the Saudis/Arabs are dirty. Sunni vs. Shia are second only to hating the Jews. So this won’t surprise anyone that they’re trying to overthrow Assad.
But where in these emails does it point to her being complicit? Otherwise it will be spun as only 1/2 a “smoking gun”....so to speak.
I'm sure she was part of that decision and now she wants to increase Obama's potential terrorist intake by 550%. The email doesn't say that however. Nor does the email supply evidence for other crimes or criminal intent. What we could specifically prosecute is the taking of Saudi and being on the board of the ISIS supporters (a different email and her foundation disclosures). I realize you are trying to paint a bigger picture of maliciousness and while that is true, the email doesn't support actual chargeable offenses.
If you want to, you can reply with actual charges. Being an Alinskyite and hating America are unfortunately rather common these days but those are not specific chargeable offenses.
I read it through [Hillary’s email you posted], and it ‘sounds’ like she formed a lunatic plan to scrape a motley crew together to tilt with windmills.
But she might arguably have [officially] presumed that the crazy plan ‘just might work’.
But I don’t see the sizzle that matches the headline.
Same here.
My new operating theory is that the Saudis (or some muslim country or group of countries) used 9-11 as a show of force to those in power in the US to warn them that they’d better toe the line.
Perhaps they were displeased that the dems failed to steal the election from Bush. That would explain why Gore was such a jerk and dragged everything through the court system and continued to try to manufacture non-existent votes. 9-11 may have been the cost of the dems failure to gain the WH. (Not that I think the Bushes are above reproach, either.)
That also explains the massive voter fraud in 2008, 2012, and ongoing right now.
I have ALWAYS believed that Benghazi was a money and arms deal gone wrong. Or maybe even gone “right” in Hitlery’s eyes. I’ve never been sure about whether she intended to off the Ambassador, whether that was an accident, or whether it was a happy accident for her. Hitlery was trading guns for money in Benghazi and the bad part about it for her was that it nearly exposed her.
She would sell her own grandchildren if the price was right.
I read one email [post 217], and if you have a military mind you might get a lot of laughs out of it.
Not that this matches the headline, but Hillary was grasping at straws IMHO to defeat ISIS without helping Assad. After all, Saudi Arabia and Qatar paid her handsomely to destroy Assad [bribery via Clinton Foundation].
Your theory would also explain why we got a Hussein Obama who came out of no where. I was stunned, 7 years after 9-11 and they put that guy in there. Your theory allows that to make more sense.
Are these a new dump? 10-13-16?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult
The next administration, or the next. AFAIK, there is no statute of limitations on TREASON.............
You were right to criticize the over-hyped headline. While I do think she’s an Assad enabler, what email proves it?
I did find her lunatic plan amusing though. She’s trying to reinvent the mouse trap in Syria.
Assad is the secularist — brutal yes, but Christians could actually eke out a living there. And she’s trying to defeat ISIS and Assad at the same time.
Utterly insane unless you think about all the Clinton Foundation money she raked in from the Saudis and Qatar.
I tell you what. I was embarassed yesterday.
I put out a link list on Hillary and gun control. A very hot issue this year that’s been neglected.
But I goofed up — I posted ‘right to bare arms’.
[Yes, I know it’s supposed to be ‘bear’. But I slip sometimes with synonyms no matter what I know. Mental dyslexia.]
Hecklers completely trashed the thread.
LOL!....Well, at least you didn’t write “Right to Arm Bears”!...........
God bless you for your research.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.