I read it through [Hillary’s email you posted], and it ‘sounds’ like she formed a lunatic plan to scrape a motley crew together to tilt with windmills.
But she might arguably have [officially] presumed that the crazy plan ‘just might work’.
But I don’t see the sizzle that matches the headline.
#273 provides the incriminating connections.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3479854/posts?page=273#273
The linked email to Podesta provides the crucial piece that implicates her in treason. That piece is that she knew her benefactors were funding ISIS.
Note that nowhere in the email does she discuss cutting off the funding. She talks about ‘pressure’ not to stop ISIS but to contain the rivalry between the Saudis and the Qataris.
Why would she want to stop such a rivalry? Both are funding ISIS and her. ISIS is growing. Who will call the shots and control the heads of ISIS? The Saudis or the Qataris? That is the root of the rivalry.
She feigns ‘diplomatic pressure’ will quell the rivalry.
She takes PC cover offering to support the KRG to take out ISIS which is not going to happen. The Kurds do not travel into regions outside their historical home region for purposes of attacking another tribe; they do not go on the offense in foreign areas; they fight defense. She is making the statement re: the KRG to cover herself politically. She knows ISIS will not be contained in this way. She is on record as acting to overthrow Assad which the KRG is more friendly with. The KRG will not cooperate with her.
Her entire scheme is one of Alinsky. Create conflict and confrontation, bring killers to your side, take the money, always talk in PC terms, and repeat. She and her circle grow in power while her opposition gets bogged down with non-PC polemical arguments and the prospect of seeking a solution to terrorists on American soil.
She has no plan or desire to find a solution that brings stability. Stability in this arena is not her goal. Her goal is to remain relevant and take the money, lots of it.
If there are conflicts between regional powers, she inserts herself and looks for an angle to get the money.
If there is peace or quiet, she is not happy because she has no role.
Hillary is a leftist feminist who seeks conflict and the creation of conflict whenever and wherever. Such conditions provide her opportunity to profit when she has a power such as the US military and intelligence agencies behind her to make her relevant. Peace and stability are anathema to her whole existence. She must have or create conflict and confrontation.