#273 provides the incriminating connections.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3479854/posts?page=273#273
The linked email to Podesta provides the crucial piece that implicates her in treason. That piece is that she knew her benefactors were funding ISIS.
Note that nowhere in the email does she discuss cutting off the funding. She talks about ‘pressure’ not to stop ISIS but to contain the rivalry between the Saudis and the Qataris.
Why would she want to stop such a rivalry? Both are funding ISIS and her. ISIS is growing. Who will call the shots and control the heads of ISIS? The Saudis or the Qataris? That is the root of the rivalry.
She feigns ‘diplomatic pressure’ will quell the rivalry.
She takes PC cover offering to support the KRG to take out ISIS which is not going to happen. The Kurds do not travel into regions outside their historical home region for purposes of attacking another tribe; they do not go on the offense in foreign areas; they fight defense. She is making the statement re: the KRG to cover herself politically. She knows ISIS will not be contained in this way. She is on record as acting to overthrow Assad which the KRG is more friendly with. The KRG will not cooperate with her.
Her entire scheme is one of Alinsky. Create conflict and confrontation, bring killers to your side, take the money, always talk in PC terms, and repeat. She and her circle grow in power while her opposition gets bogged down with non-PC polemical arguments and the prospect of seeking a solution to terrorists on American soil.
She has no plan or desire to find a solution that brings stability. Stability in this arena is not her goal. Her goal is to remain relevant and take the money, lots of it.
If there are conflicts between regional powers, she inserts herself and looks for an angle to get the money.
If there is peace or quiet, she is not happy because she has no role.
Hillary is a leftist feminist who seeks conflict and the creation of conflict whenever and wherever. Such conditions provide her opportunity to profit when she has a power such as the US military and intelligence agencies behind her to make her relevant. Peace and stability are anathema to her whole existence. She must have or create conflict and confrontation.
Hillary is bloodthirsty...unfortunately, so are many of her supporters.
You and I and all of FR know what you wrote here is the truth. However as you pointed out:
1. She doesn’t advocate the US supporting ISIS (or “ISIL”) she advocates the Saudi’s and Quatar support them.
2. She also goes on to support the notion of the KRG taking out ISIS and US supporting that effort.
3. She uses PC double-speak and enough weasel words to Alinsky her way out of directly supporting ISIS throughout the rest of the email.
Again anyone with half a brain and no bias in favor of Secty Cankles can see she was supporting the notion of using ISIS as a means to an end in a deluded and quite frankly stupid opinion that ISIS could then itself be easily defeated. Of course it wasn’t and hasn’t been, hence her delusion and stupidity.
Also again though she uses enough weasel words and double talk that now it can be argued she “never directly supported ISIS and in fact always supported their eventual destruction” or some other similar deflective defense.
This is how it will be spun, if it’s even reported by the media at all which it probably won’t. No FRiend, we are supposed to worry more about whether or not Trump is a lecher than whether or not Clinton is responsible for the formation of ISIS. And forget about the fact she may have enabled a rapist in the past, far beyond engaging in lecherous activity or enabling same.
That is what we are supposed to think and worry about. Because the media says so. Resistance is futile.
Once again, what is the law that was broken? Did she take Saudi money and influence policy to benefit the Saudis? Probably. But it's not in the email. You say:
She talks about `pressure' not to stop ISIS but to contain the rivalry between the Saudis and the Qataris.
In the email she says
we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region
That doesn't match up with your claim. If I am quoting the wrong part of the email, then quote the correct part below.