Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage
The linked email to Podesta provides the crucial piece that implicates her in treason. That piece is that she knew her benefactors were funding ISIS.

Once again, what is the law that was broken? Did she take Saudi money and influence policy to benefit the Saudis? Probably. But it's not in the email. You say:

She talks about `pressure' not to stop ISIS but to contain the rivalry between the Saudis and the Qataris.

In the email she says

we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region

That doesn't match up with your claim. If I am quoting the wrong part of the email, then quote the correct part below.

284 posted on 10/13/2016 9:09:30 AM PDT by palmer (turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

Your argument is short and blinded. You’d make a typical hack addition to team Clinton.

She has committed treason by acting as an agent for an enemy’s bankers and acting to bring that enemy into the US where the enemy has killed and will continue to kill American innocents.

It could not be more clear.


291 posted on 10/13/2016 10:01:25 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson