Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shock PPP national poll: Trump 25, Cruz 21, Rubio 21
Hotair ^ | 02/04/2016 | AllahPundit

Posted on 02/04/2016 9:08:31 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Cruz’s numbers here aren’t a shock — he’s been in the high teens and low twenties for awhile — but Trump hasn’t dipped as low as 25 percent in a national poll since November and Rubio hasn’t seen a number as high as 21 percent since … ever. That makes some righty poll-watchers nervous since PPP’s credibility has been attacked in the past. Not only are they liberal, they were the subject of a famous critique of their methodology by Nate Cohn in TNR a few years ago. If you’re looking to throw out this result, which no other pollster has captured, there you go. On the other hand, RCP finds them credible enough to include them in their poll average. Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight site also deems PPP worthy of being rated (a B- for accuracy). I’ve been writing up their polls all primary season long, including ones that showed Trump soaring. If you accepted their other polls at face value, why start ignoring them now?

It’s true, national polls are almost totally worthless — but that never stopped Trump from crowing about them at his rallies, and after a surprising result in Iowa they can be helpful in detecting whether there really has been a change in voter sentiment that might show up next week in New Hampshire. If you believe PPP, Marcomentum is real and Trump may well be on his way down the drain.

Trump's 25% standing reflects a 9 point drop from our last national poll, which was taken the week before Christmas. It reflects an overall decline in Trump's popularity with GOP voters. Trump's favorability has dropped a net 17 points, from a previous +24 standing at 58/34 to now just +7 at 48/41.Trump is particularly starting to struggle on the right- he's dropped to 3rd place with ‘very conservative' voters at 19% with Cruz at 34% and Rubio at 22% outpacing him with that group. He does still lead with moderates and ‘somewhat conservative' voters to give him the overall advantage.

Rubio is the candidate with the real momentum in the race. He's up 8 points from his 13% standing in our poll right before Christmas. Beyond that he's seen a large spike in his favorability rating- it's improved a net 28 points from +15 at 49/34 to +43 at 64/21. That ties him with Ben Carson as being the most broadly popular candidate on the Republican side.

Things also bode well for Rubio as the field gets smaller in the coming weeks. In a four candidate field he gets 32% to 31% for Trump, 23% for Cruz, and 8% for Bush. In a three candidate field he gets 34% to 33% for Trump and 25% for Cruz. And in head to heads he leads both Trump (52/40) and Cruz (46/40). As other candidates drop out of the race Rubio is the most likely destination of their supporters.

All of those numbers will change yet again, of course, if Trump holds on in New Hampshire, which I think he will. The table below isn’t good for him, though. Bear in mind that Cruz and Rubio are both net favorable among nearly every other candidate’s supporters, meaning that if either one of them ends up in a two-man race with Trump, they’re looking good:

trumpfav

Rubio also does well as the second choice of supporters of Jeb Bush and John Kasich, both of whom are likely to be out soon:

2ndchoice

On the other hand, Cruz cleans up among fans of Ben Carson, who’s also likely to be out soon. Interestingly, Christie fans prefer Cruz to Rubio as a second choice, which may be the product of butthurt over his fade in New Hampshire or may be statistical noise due to a small subsample.

One more result for you. Here’s what happens when other candidates’ voters are forced to choose between Rubio and Cruz.

cruzrubio

I remind you again that national polls are useless, as Cruz will/would obviously do better than these numbers in his southern strongholds, which are coming up on March 1st. (Much better if Trump’s not in the race at that point.) Don’t forget, though, that Rubio’s playing a long game, eyeing the more moderate electorates that’ll show up for winner-take-all primaries when blue-state Republicans start voting later this spring. He may outperform these numbers in those strongholds, which will be trouble for Cruz.

But that’s all too far in the future. What about New Hampshire? Rubio inched up to 15 percent there in the latest poll, his best showing in weeks, but Trump’s still at 36 percent. Even if you allow for a “Trump effect” in the polls, where Trump’s support is systematically overstated by, say, five points, Rubio still has to make up more than 15 points in the next five days. And he has to do it with basically everyone in the field not only attacking him but forging alliances to attack him:

Members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt Mr. Rubio's rise in the polls, according to Republican operatives familiar with the conversations.

While emails, texts and phone calls between operatives in rival campaigns are not uncommon in the tight-knit world of political strategists, the contact between senior aides in the two campaigns has drifted toward musings about what can be done to stop or at least slow Mr. Rubio, the operatives said.

In a sign of a budding alliance, the aides have, for example, exchanged news articles that raise potential areas of vulnerability for Mr. Rubio. There is no formal coordination, the operatives stressed, but rather a recognition of a shared agenda…

A division of labor seems to have taken hold. While a well-financed "super PAC" supporting Mr. Bush assails Mr. Rubio on television and in the mail (it will release a new batch of ads on Thursday), Mr. Christie has stepped up the critiques on the campaign trail.

The latest joint Bush/Christie production is to attack Rubio for being unelectable because he’s … too hardline on abortion. So Rubio’s not too establishment for a Republican primary? He’s actually … too conservative? Admittedly, any attack by Bush or Christie will seem feeble because they have the stench of death around them, but I don’t get Christie’s “boy in the bubble” takedown and I don’t see how abortion is the magic bullet that destroys Rubio’s vaunted electability. All Republican candidates will be attacked as “anti-woman,” whatever the nuances of their positions on exceptions for rape. If you want to stop Rubio, you’re best off hitting him for lacking experience — which Christie and Bush are both doing, wisely — and for his great heresy on immigration. But Jeb can’t do that because he’s knee-deep in amnesty too, and no one believes Christie when he pretends to be offended by the Gang of Eight. The dilemma for Bush, Kasich, and Christie is that, while Rubio may be establishment, he’s still less establishment than they are even with the immigration bill chained to his ankles. How do you beat him in New Hampshire from the left?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Florida; US: Kentucky; US: New Hampshire; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Ohio; US: Texas; US: Vermont; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: allahpundit; andrewkaczynski; arkansas; bencarson; berniesanders; buzzfeed; california; carlyfiorina; chrischristie; cnsrvtvtreehouse; cruz; dailykos; erickerickson; florida; glennbeck; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; hotair; hotwindoutofhisass; hotwindoutohisass; ibtz; jebbush; jimgilmore; johnkasich; kaczucker; kentucky; marcorubio; marklevin; markosmoulitsas; megynkelly; newhampshire; newjersey; newyork; ohio; pinkstain; pinkstate; politico; poll; redstate; redstategathering; rogerailes; rubio; sundance; tedcruz; texas; trump; trumpwillbenominee; vermont; virginia; vox; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: blowfish

Cruz’s slow and steady vs. Trump’s wild and crazy.

The true conservative choice is obvious.

Reagan wasn’t wild and crazy.


41 posted on 02/04/2016 10:19:56 AM PST by lifeline (The Bible alone and in its entirety is the Word of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

Keep clinging to Iowa, we’re just a few days from Trump winning the state that actually picked the GOP nominees in 2008 and 2012.


42 posted on 02/04/2016 10:31:08 AM PST by ScottWalkerForPresident2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yup. And again, there are the usuals who will go off and stay home after the candidate is chosen.

And we get a admitted commie as president. Just great!


43 posted on 02/04/2016 10:32:32 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScottWalkerForPresident2016

“Keep clinging to Iowa”

Nobody is clinging to Iowa. Read my previous posts.

NH is irrelevant so keep hanging your hopes on a liberal State. That is kind of sad that Trump only does well in liberal area. Cling to that!


44 posted on 02/04/2016 10:33:08 AM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I guess he can say in the next debate that “I’m leading by a small amount” instead of saying “I’m leading by a lot.”


45 posted on 02/04/2016 10:47:12 AM PST by erod (Chicago Conservative | Cruz or Lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse

After Iowa, why would anyone pay attention to polls?
_____________________________________________________

Because Trump spend most of his speeches bragging about how rich he is and his poll numbers.


46 posted on 02/04/2016 10:48:06 AM PST by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

It’s at the beginning of the topic. As I said, it was distorted before. This is the graphic without the height=”226” and width=”650” to obscure the numbers.


47 posted on 02/04/2016 10:49:27 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: erod

PPP is a leftist poll not taken serious by anyone that follows polls. It has never had Trump higher than the mid 20s. Ignore it. Totally unreliable.

There’s Something Wrong With America’s Premier Liberal Pollster

https://newrepublic.com/article/114682/ppp-polling-methodology-opaque-flawed


48 posted on 02/04/2016 11:06:57 AM PST by NKP_Vet (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock ~ T, Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Trump has a 95% favorability among people who voted for Trump in the “primary”? Unbelievable.


49 posted on 02/04/2016 11:56:48 AM PST by Darth Reardon (During the Great Depression, World War I was referred to as the Great War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reardon
By contrast, under your interpretation, the people who should worry are those with high numbers in the "Unfavorable" line. Thanks for playing.

50 posted on 02/04/2016 12:06:49 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
By contrast, under your interpretation, the people who should worry are those with high numbers in the "Unfavorable" line. Thanks for playing.

Um, there's only one candidate that has any numbers in the unfavorable line. Note the column heading "Trump Favorability".

Look at the table. Of those who voted for Jeb, 25% find Trump favorable, 69% find Trump unfavorable, and 6% are unsure.

Of those who voted for Carson, 43% find Trump favorable, 47% unfavorable, 10% unsure.

Of those who voted for Trump, 95% find Trump favorable, 1% unfavorable, and 4% unsure.

This is not my interpretation, it's how one correctly reads the table. Thanks for playing, as you so politely put it.

51 posted on 02/04/2016 12:47:42 PM PST by Darth Reardon (During the Great Depression, World War I was referred to as the Great War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; sickoflibs; randita; campaignPete R-CT

Trump, the paper mache unstoppable frontrunner?

Nah! This poll is a lies, all lies, surely.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6cn0mLJVZY


52 posted on 02/04/2016 2:08:01 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I thinking more and more that Rubio is going to be the nominee. Way to go Carson and Trump!


53 posted on 02/04/2016 4:10:18 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; sickoflibs; randita

spent 2 hours listening to Cruz today at his event. NH

back at the hotel ready to post videos to website.

unexpected opportunity.

(Trump event was so jammed nobody could get near it.)


54 posted on 02/04/2016 7:48:08 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (https://www.facebook.com/NHforTedCruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; randita; campaignPete R-CT; Reagan Disciple; EQAndyBuzz
RE:”Trump, the paper mache unstoppable frontrunner?”

Yep Trump calling Cruz Canadian, dodging the GOP Iowa /FNC debate and now refusing to accept the GOP Iowa results all show Trump as the fighter we need.

Now he says that what the Cruz campaign did was a least a misdemeanor under federal election law. And Trump knows the law given all the time he spent in court,

If he looses again its surely fraud again.
How could it be anything else?

55 posted on 02/04/2016 7:53:30 PM PST by sickoflibs (Trump : 'WAAH, 'Either a new Iowa election should take place or the Cruz results nullified')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT; Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; randita
RE:”(Trump event was so jammed nobody could get near it.)”

Back in the 1980s I went to see Pink Floyd live at JFK stadium Philadelphia with a new girlfriend and a few other friends.

They put Pink Floyd on a big screen because they look like dots in a huge stadium. And they filled it.

Light rain came down as they played Comfortably Numb (Roger Waters singing lead).

It really moved me emotionally.

Not happening with Trump.

56 posted on 02/04/2016 8:04:23 PM PST by sickoflibs (Trump : 'WAAH, There is no way I could have lost Iowa, Look at the polls. Obviously fraud')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

we could call the Trump, “the Pink”

trying to get to Rubio event tomorrow nite


57 posted on 02/04/2016 8:08:09 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (https://www.facebook.com/NHforTedCruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper; SoConPubbie; campaignPete R-CT; Reagan Disciple; EQAndyBuzz; Impy; BillyBoy
RE:”Trump will sue the poll respondents.”

Better yet, Trump will tweet that they broke the law and then do nothing, but more talking.

Who knows what crazy $hit he will spit out next??

His claim that Cruz campaign broke Federal election law ignores the fact that party primaries are NOT Federal elections.

This guy thrives in the gutter and will make up and say anything.

58 posted on 02/04/2016 8:21:47 PM PST by sickoflibs (Trump : 'WAAH, There is no way I could have lost Iowa, Look at the polls. Obviously fraud')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; sickoflibs; randita

https://johnodell67.blogspot.com/b/post-preview?token=m9qJsVIBAAA.T-tmLB39VHKplThOUs7zxPJjiwAwrElfHZ7Ej0JrdtlDaE_6IARpTG4mpK-1W_Vblk9s-X1niH1yjWAjGPCfkg.BApR1y7lHcLmHJAevvz_Vg&postId=5566463814109764582&type=POST

working on best way to get my vids up. I think I will try youtube. can I embed them on Freerepublic? like a photo


59 posted on 02/04/2016 9:08:39 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (https://www.facebook.com/NHforTedCruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; sickoflibs; randita; fieldmarshaldj

http://johnodell67.blogspot.com/2016/02/weare-nh.html

the true link


60 posted on 02/04/2016 9:19:20 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (https://www.facebook.com/NHforTedCruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson