Posted on 02/03/2016 8:55:56 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
I've knocked around Rand Paul quite a lot over the last year-plus, and I think most or all if it was well-deserved (I've also, it should be noted, praised him a few times as well, when he deserved it). But Paul's decision to drop out of the race today (before New Hampshire) in order to help unify the party to defeat Trump, shows that he, like Scott Walker, is a true Republican who believes in conservative principles, and for that he should be commended.
See, there are two types of people who call themselves Republicans. The first are those who call themselves Republicans because they believe in things like limited government, lower taxes, less government regulations, and the sanctity of human life at all stages of development. The second are those who call themselves Republicans because they perceive that doing so will help elevate them personally or their national profile.
An example of the latter would be Mike Huckabee, who has spent the last two weeks of his campaign living up the rectal canal of Donald Trump, a man whose personal life and politics stand opposed to everything Huckabee has preached for the last three decades. An example of the former would be Scott Walker, who decided not to fight a losing campaign because he understood the need for the party to unify sooner, rather than later, against the existential threat of Trump.
Paul has squarely placed himself in the Scott Walker camp of true Republicans, and rejected the Huckabee camp of career opportunism. Paul knew he was not going to win the nomination, but he had reason to believe that he might have a respectable showing in New Hampshire. Staying in the race for another week would not have measurably hurt his Senate campaign, and he could have gotten himself some free television exposure during this week's debate. Instead, he did the right thing and folded up now, realizing that the best way to stop Trump is for the field for narrow sooner, rather than later.
In this, Rand has shown more maturity and respect for the party than his father, who carried on two pointless campaigns all the way to the convention just to prove a point of some sort. Rand's campaign hasn't been as successful as either of those were, but he's shown himself to be a bigger man, regardless, and for that he can hold his head high.
A libertarian can be a Republican; a Libertarian can’t be.
Red State is a putrid cesspool of foul language, sexually based epithets, and gutter biology.
I'm appalled that NR would actually have Erick Erickson dirty the pages of their magazine.
I love Rand Paul. I just want him to stay in the senate along with Cruz and Rubio. Well not Rubio. :-)
I love Rand Paul. I just want him to stay in the senate along with Cruz and Rubio. Well not Rubio. :-)
Rand Paul On Shutdown: "Even Though It Appeared I Was Participating In It, It Was A Dumb Idea"I said throughout the whole battle that shutting down the government was a dumb idea. Even though it did appear as if I was participating in it, I said it was a dumb idea. And the reason I voted for it, though, is that it's a conundrum. Here's the conundrum. We have a $17 trillion debt and people at home tell me you can't give the president a blank check. We just can't keep raising the debt ceiling without conditions. So unconditionally raising the debt ceiling, nobody at home wants me to vote for that and I can't vote for that. But the conundrum is if I don't we do approach these deadlines. So there is an impasse. In 2011, though, we had this impasse and the president did negotiate. We got the sequester. If we were to extend the sequester from discretionary spending to all the entitlements we would actually fix our problem within a few years.[Posted on 11/19/2013 12:16:51 PM by Third Person]
Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.[Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]
Rand Paul's immigration speech...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.[Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg]
Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.
Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.
Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.
If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...
This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.
Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reformLatinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...[Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
[but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]
Rand Slams Congress for Funding Egypt's Generals: 'How Does Your Conscience Feel Now?'Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt's military -- even as Cairo's security forces massacre anti-government activists. [by "anti-government activists" is meant church-burning Christian-murdering jihadists][Posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:10 PM PDT by Hoodat]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.