Posted on 02/01/2016 8:15:26 AM PST by Hojczyk
Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin joined the Today show to talk about her endorsement of Donald Trump as Iowans go to caucus tonight for the Republican presidential primary.
is was probably a tough call for you, between Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)97% and Donald Trump, began Savannah Guthrie during the interview.
t wasnât tough,â Palin interrupted.
Really, Guthrie replied.
No, it wasnât tough, she repeated.
Palin explained that she was happy to endorse Ted Cruz in his Senate race, because he was a fighter for the American people but that she wanted him to stay in Washington D.C.
want to keep him in the Senate, and I want Donald Trump to be our president, she said.
Guthrie asked Palin if Trump was necessarily âthe godly candidateâ for evangelical voters.
I hope voters arenât trying to find the most Christian-y godliest candidate out there because who are we to judge one anotherâs level of faith â our Christian quotient if you will, she said.
Host Matt Lauer suggested that perhaps Donald Trump wasnât enough of a true conservative, citing his Democratic record.
Palin referred to Ronald Reagan, pointing out that she was âgladâ that Donald Trump was a candidate that had âseen the light.â
Later in the show, Palin was asked by co-host Willie Geist about what she brought to Donald Trumpâs campaign by endorsing him.
Iâm very, very conservative, very much a right-winger, proudly clinging to my God, my guns and my Constitution, she said. âI think I speak for a lot of Americans who have those same values.â
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I think your testimony speaks volumes. Are you a Cruz supporter, or is Rubio your man ?
Yep, more than likely a lie. I started looking for the source and it was from junk site supposedly quoting Robert Cohen, an ex DT business associate.
I doubt it is about the money. Palin wants to be a political player but keeps being brushed by the leadership. Plus Trump, whatever his politics, is an alpha male, and she has always liked guys like that.
That's really harsh and unfair. Sarah is the ONLY Republican female politician on the national stage who actually espouses Constitutional Conservative principles,
Palin's endorsement came after lots of Trump supporters were really harsh with personal comments about Bristol after she defended her mom, and then coming verbally after her PTSD son after that situation with the law.
Mama Bear then defended her cubs by endorsing Trump, showing up at rallies for one day, then leaving the campaign trail. She's back now for the Iowa caucus.
Maybe it's just another case (as with Shamegate) of Cruz's staff being way too aggressive and Cruz not having the judgement to know when to rein them in.
Where does my scenario fall apart?
Reagan formally changed his party ID in 1962 and endorsed Goldwater in â64.
________________________
Phyllis Schlafy understands that we are up against it. She endorsed Trump.
I don't even know what the heck you're talking about? Where did you learn to write?
If you think that Ted Cruz as President would be his greatest use, you have missed Sarah’s point.
On the other hand, Trump would not be useful anywhere other than President. Different skill set.
Trump uses the bully pulpit, Ted gets the legislation through because of megaphone used by Trump. Its a good plan. Would not work in reverse.
Even if they did care, it would be near impossible to find anything but boilerplate snark and venom.
Here, before there is any gnashing of teeth here is the money quote:
"Palin explained that she was happy to endorse Ted Cruz in his Senate race, because he was a fighter for the American people but that she wanted him to stay in Washington D.C.
"I want to keep him in the Senate, and I want Donald Trump to be our president," she said"
Sarah is friends with both Ted Cruz AND Trump, this is a hotly contested race and it will start to be decided today.
I think Ted Cruz would be a great president, However I do enjoy the fact that he has made life Hell for the Progs in the Senate.
This is politics and everyone single one of us won't come to the same conclusion as everyone else, The Democrats do, but we don't. I think that is a good thing.
After the convention, I doubt we'll have to choose between them. Thanks KC_Lion.
I can't believe I have to actually explain this. You simply, either, select different personal questions (ones where the answers aren't known or can be easily figured out), or you don't put people's actual/true names down, but rather just about anything else, even a random set of keyboard characters. Yahoo doesn't care if the answers are true or not. Then jot it down somewhere so you'll have it if ever needed.
>> Reagan assisted with identifying communist influence in Hollywood in the early 1950s. He was a dem, but no liberal <<
I don’t think that’s exactly correct. Reagan admitted that he had been a strong New Deal liberal, but he never seems to have been a true leftist. That’s a big difference, IMO.
Anyway, Reagan was still an old-fashioned union-loving liberal during the 1950’s when he started making speeches for General Electric. But over the course of eight or so years, he read and studied deeply about the issues of the day. In the course of this self-educational endeavor, he gradually changed his opinions — just as did a lot of others, myself included.
The outcome was that by 1962, Reagan had become a deeply committed conservative, with a profound intellectual understanding of the relevant issues. He also was a masterful writer, as can be seen from the collection of his newspaper columns. Moreover, he composed the material himself, not like Trump and others, with the aid of ghost writers.
Bottom Line:
Any attempt to equate Reagan’s sincere and profound turn-around with Trump’s “foxhole conversion” would be laughable if it weren’t so disgusting.
Lol yea.... because expanding obamacare is so much better a stance than those things.
You bash cruz every chance and follow Trump all because cruz isn’t conservative enough for you.
Hilarious.
I call B.S.
Alaska ain’t Texas.
You can’t buy a parcel of private land up here anywhere close to that size unless it was a purchase from a Native Corporation.
Federal, State and Native (Indian and Eskimo) make up 99% of our land mass. That’s both good and bad in my opinion.
Thinking on it real quick the island I live on, 20 acres would make you a land baron. LOL, that’s with a population of roughly 14,000.
As if we don't know that, and as if we really care about your silly issue here.
>> she was a hard working, honest chief executive of Alaska <<
Sure. And when the going gets tough, the tough get going.
Sarah who?
Sore Cruzerman looks bad on you. :-)
"I hope voters aren't trying to find the most Christian-y godliest candidate out there because who are we to judge one another's level of faith--our Christian quotient if you will," she said.
::Facepalm::
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.