Posted on 11/19/2009 3:13:17 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
Creationists are liars' (?): Geologist Donald Prothero doesnt like the fact that we dont agree with his ideas on evolution.
I love the attitude some evolutionists have toward professional, scientific debate. Because creationist scientists do not agree with their biased, subjective and unsubstantiated ideas they spit the dummy and call us liars.
The latest tirade from geologist Donald Prothero is in an opinion piece in NewScientist entitled ‘Evolution: What missing link?’1 I like that title.
His article was picked up by the Telegraph newspaper in the UK which reported, ‘Creationists “peddle lies about the fossil record”.’2
Lies? Are creationists really lying?
No!
It’s just that Prothero does not like the fact that we don’t agree with his ideas. It upsets him so much that he describes creationists in this way: ...
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
Only if he really said it. Now, if he didn't..........
If he didn’t ... then I should be more alert to the possibility of distortions or false reporting by the media - all media - which one can forget about when it’s dinnertime.
Projection. or reprojecaduction..
Yep. case in point. The member of the Dover School who made a solemn deposition that he had no idea where the money to buy the cdesign proponentist book Pandas Thumb came from.
When it was discovered that it came from his personal cheque account, his excuse was that he misspoke because he was hepped up on goofballs.
You may choose to believe him
FWIW, a "find" on the article returns 0 results for that phrase.
I have always thought that ones eternity in Hell was predicated on the rejection of Jesus Christ as the Son of God, not a belief or disbelief in evolution. If other errors in belief are acceptable as something that would condemn one to Hell wouldnt a belief in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny also qualify? Just ask’n
I have always thought that ones eternity in Hell was predicated on the rejection of Jesus Christ as the Son of God, not a belief or disbelief in evolution. If other errors in belief are acceptable as something that would condemn one to Hell wouldnt a belief in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny also qualify? Just ask’n
Let’s suppose for a moment that an individual Creationist or an IDer did lie, should that invalidate the argument from Creation/ID? If so, does this same standard apply to evolution with respect to all the liars and frauds that have plagued the evo-camp all these years?
That’s fine and its very common among scientists to disagree on various points. Good science is not consesus science. (Why global warming science is junk BTW)
In my opinion its very interesting that creation and the big bang theory mesh so well. However the big bang theory has some big holes in it that simply can’t be explained away. I attribute those holes to God.
It just seems that every time we get to the real picky litte answers we run into the unexplainable and I think there’s a reason for that.
Good, I expect you to know the difference between what is truth and what are lies.
Aren't we being implicitly asked by the author to judge all the scientific evidence and theories on the basis of one man having unfairly accused creationists of lying?
“I know I left a billion data points of evidence that all pointed to a billions of years old universe and the gradual development of modern species over eons; and I know you accepted Jesus into your heart and asked for forgiveness in his name, but if ONLY you had ALSO accepted a literal interpretation of Genesis.... too bad... Hell for you.”
If there theological position wasn't so hateful and ignorant it might actually be funny.
And I expect you to be able to rationalize anything that disagrees with your religious beliefs as being a lie. I also expect to be accused of "projection" before the end of this thread.
The evos are still conducting keyword attacks on Creation/ID threads after both sides were told to knock it off. We are holding up our end of the bargain, and yet the evos persist. If you look in the keyword section of this post, you will find:
“belongsinreligion” “notasciencetopic” “notscience” “propellerbeanie” “spammer”
I believe that Gods word never pushed the issue because it was immaterial in his overall plan for Mans salvation. Believe in evolution if you must, or Creationism if you must neither has much to do with ones salvation in the long run. Gods word doesnt say that the only way to heaven is through Jesus and a belief in creationism (or evolution), just a belief in Jesus as God. (By the way, Im a young earth creationist). ;-)
LOL!
This is a perfect example of the oxymoron reasoning of the Evo's; they all have faith in a religion originated by a man who was not a scientist but a man who majored in theology; i.e., Darwin.
Actaully, that is a standard tactic among evos...and you don’t have to go any further than FR to see regularly employed. But if you do go beyond FR, you will find that the evos on FR learned this tactic from the high priests of the Temple of Darwin (such as the evo geologist mentioned in this very article).
LOL!
Well, that just goes to show you they have no case.
Sorta proves they just don’t get it.
Keep on posting GGG.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.