Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
I’m very likely older than you are, hon, born the year after WWII ended.
I disagree, and so does the 14th Amendment and
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1401 in the U.S. Code.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html
I’m convinced that the Obama administration is the Fourth Reich. They seem to be repeating every action that the Nazis did in the 1930’s, as if it were a playbook.
Yes, I believe all you wrote. We just need evidence. (I know, I say that a lot and it’s getting annoying.)
I had hoped that someone would have by now been acting behind the scenes with a lot of top-notch resources to find the truth.
Jan. 16, 2009
____________________________
*snip*
(b) Exceptions to Reciprocal Recognition. A gaining agency is not required to grant reciprocal recognition to a prior favorable fitness or suitability determination when:
(i) the new position requires a higher level of investigation than previously conducted for that individual;
(ii) an agency obtains new information that calls into question the individual’s fitness based on character or conduct; or
(iii) the individual’s investigative record shows conduct that is incompatible with the core duties of the new position.
Sec. 5. Reinvestigation of Individuals in Positions of Public Trust.
Individuals in positions of public trust shall be subject to reinvestigation under standards (including but not limited to the frequency of such reinvestigation)
as determined by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, to ensure their suitability for continued employment.
Sec. 6. Responsibilities.
(a) An agency shall report to the Office of Personnel Management the nature and results of the background investigation and fitness determination (or later changes to that determination) made on an individual, to the extent consistent with law.
(b) The Director of the Office of Personnel Management is delegated authority to implement this order, including the authority to issue regulations and guidance governing suitability, or guidance related to fitness, as the
Director determines appropriate.
More at
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1574.pdf
Oh, please. He’s a she, anyway. If you know LeftCoast (I forget the rest of his name), he can vouch for me. He’s known me for 15 years or so online (privately).
If your problem is merely impatience, sorry.
The road is long .. the journey hard.
Aug 15, 1945....What happened.
Dad says Cornell ref is like the NYT, not the WSJ. (5-4 vote)
He no longer has his law library, but during Bush/Gore he wrote the volume, chapter, paragraph that would decide the SCOTUS case and the final vote on a piece of paper and gave it too one of the judges in town.
The day it was decided the judge opened it up and dad was 100% correct. He told dad “If you were twenty years younger I'd nominate you for the federal court.”
To which dad replied “If I were ten years younger I'd take it!”
“But people here refuse to accept the U.S. statute that defines who is a citizen at birth (in other words, a NBC).” You are now asserting that all citizens at birth are natural born citizens. That is not proven but you spittle it like it’s settled law.”
When you find it in the U.S. Code, yes, that is considered settled law if there are no pending cases challenging its constitutionality. Indeed, the present law (until the Supreme Court rules otherwise) is that an anchor baby is a NBC.
The 14th Amendment is the law, too, and we are not free to say either of them is not the law without looking like idiots.
“I was hoping the KBC was real. Alas, it was not.” And you assert that like the original paper Orly has has been exposed as a forgery. It has not, yet you assert that like it is settled. I’d say you’re working for the Axelgreasy side, pretending to be a neutral Freeper ... and ridiculing freepers all along the way, you are.”
Orly’s pleading makes it very clear that she did not have a paper document — EVER. She was asking the court to help her locate and then authenticate the document. You haven’t read her pleadings, but I have.
God bless and protect Sam Alito.
I was lucky enough to spend a little time with Bush Sr. the summer after he lost to Clinton. My husband and I had an hour’s walk on a beach with him in the Mediterranean. I got a very strong impression of decency, integrity, warmth — all good feelings. He was charming and gracious and he didn’t have to be. Wonderful sense of humor, too. He made some zinger remarks about the head of the Repub. party in my home town.
We got a special treat because we got to see him blush, rub his face and act embarrassed. A beautiful Greek woman took advantage of the topless aspect of the beach and gave him, intentionally, a really good show frolicking in the shallows. It was really funny to see how uncomfortable (though he did indeed do more than peek!) he was. He said, “I don’t think I could ever get used to that.” He meant just being ho hum on a topless beach.
I am convinced the Bushes are good people. Like father, like son. Though W was not a good conservative in many ways, BDS (he was chimpy stupid but cunningly evil/) was simply unfathomable to me.
Dad says the U.S. Code is not sufficient evidence? Sorry, but it’s the law of the country. You do know what the U.S. Code is, right?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/
Contents and context
Welcome to the United States Code.
•This version is generated from the most recent official version made available by the US House of Representatives. For exact information about the currency of any particular title as it is published by the House, see the listing on the House server. The date of any text appearing on this site appears in italics at the upper right in every Code section.
•Each section in the framed version is dated at the upper right corner of the text frame; these date the text itself as we receive it from the House, and are not the date on which we loaded the text. At this point we are not sure how often the House will issue new versions of this information to the public. Any new version issued by the House will in turn be mounted here within 24 hours. (This is not an absolute guarantee. From time to time, and without warning, the House makes changes in the format and structure of the text they make available for download. This can and does cause us to rewrite our own formatting software, hopefully with minimal delay.) In the meantime we suggest the use of the update feature available in each section.
•Our convenient update service (available onscreen as you look at each section) integrates the services of the House servers and of the Library of Congress Thomas service to supply you with accurate updates to any section which has changed.
A listing of all Titles appears below.
Close...
born on US soil / parents either born on US soil or parent/s naturalized before child is born
but either way, both parents would have been US citizens at the time of the child's birth.
I have read about Laws On Nation in multiple places over the last few days. All the Supreme Court decisions referred to this specific text.
You’re way in over your head, buddy!
For the billionth time, US Code 1401 does not and can not determine who are Natural Born Citizens.
The Exxon case also raised one side issue – an increasingly sore point among Supreme Court practitioners: the problem of justices recusing themselves from cases, usually because of stock-holdings.
Justice Samuel Alito recused himself in the Exxon case (the justices do not state their reasons when they do so) and, as a result, one of the issues the Court had planned to decide in this case – whether federal maritime law permits punitive damages to be awarded against a corporate defendant solely based upon the reckless conduct of a “managerial employee” – resulted in a 4-4 tie vote.
In such cases, the lower court’s ruling stands, but has no precedential weight.
http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/category/exxon/
The 14th Amend does not make all born on American soil, natural born citizens. You've been shown diagrams which explain it to your twisted mind in the simplest terms. Yet you continue to assert the lie you've been sent to promote.
I find you arrogance and your purposed deceit to be disgusting. To top it off, you pretend to be a conservative, a like-minded freeper. Such deceit is most insidious and revealing of a dark soul.
The more you insist on your lies, the more you are revealed to those with discernment. The only thing positive that can be said of you at this stage is that you have at least temporarily ceased insulting and ridiculing freepers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.