http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1703
<
Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
To date, no actual newspaper from the period and day has surfaced. The ONLY source for the microfiche imagery seems to be the e-mail sent to Atlas Shrugs. Replacing the microfiche squares at a few libraries carrying archives of the newspapers woul dnot even be difficult. One person could accomplish it in a matter of a few days travel time once the first copy was completed as a template.
+++++++++++++++++
Ann Dunham’s mother could have posted the birth announcements and applied for the birth cert in Hawaii [http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105371] as part of a larger family effort to ensure bammy was ‘an American.’ Nothing diabolical (other than lying to state authorities) related to Obama’s future run at POTUS. Just the normal stuff of a family looking out for its own - very agressively, granted.
As someone else posted on one of the threads, Dunham’s mother was not some old woman at the time - she was 40, a bank official and was well connected. Even that may have been a motive to want to have an ‘American’ grandchild - instead of a ‘Kenyan’ grandchild.
Of course, this presents NBC problems for bammy, so now fast forward to his run for Senate and POTUS, and you can easily see one reason why he would cover this up so aggressively.
Most thanxxx
You got it.
None of his records have been released by him. We don’t know anything at all, really. I don’t know if any of the questions have even been asked.
If he was born in Kenya and never naturalized as an American citizen, he’s an alien.
Broken f'n record and so obvious.
Did you see what happened to your buddy saquin, hmmmm
I think the broken record is on the other side... LOL...
But, sorry, I don’t know anyone by that name... I don’t recall ever posting to anyone by that name. My buddies are Sarah and Ann and Dick and so on.... :-)
The constitution also doesn't authorize the president to transport troops by airplane, but some how he has to ensure the national defense.
If it were up to ST, we would need to amend the constitution so that the president could do that and include any number of other procedural issues to authorize what we already do to carry out the constitution.
Miss a minute....miss alot.
(Pssst. They deliver pizza but you have to tip them.)
I thought at one time he was a Kenyan...then I thought Oh maybe not.......now I’m totally convinced BO is definitely a KENYAN....
Sorry, I stick with the sane people, like Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney, Ann Coulter and so on... :-)
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > §1401
The woman doctor who delivered Obama has her name on the original birth document file and she was alive and well and her location was known at some point in recent history. She was aware that the situation involves a threat to her life.
____________
At WHAT point was it known and who knew it?
Do you know where she is now?
You also forgot to mention we need to pass a state law, your slipping
It’s a slight bit different that you say. I mean by that... the Constitution says what the candidate must *be* and then it’s up to the officials to carry out the “methodology” of determining that.
Now, the conflict here is that people here have said that they want a “methodology” of “seeing the birth certificate” while the officials have simply (and with all candidates in the past) had them sign and swear an oath they are *are* what the Constitution says that they must *be* — and that is their “methodology”...
The Constitution doesn’t have a “methodology” prescribed, but merely says what the candidate must *be*...
And here’s the Constitution for you...., the *basics* of the Constitution on this qualifications issue...
And yes, there is a Constitution, it’s to follow — and here is what it says, in regards to qualifications. The Constitution says that a candidate must be the following in order to qualify for the office. The candidate must ...
*be* 35 years or older
*be* a resident 14 years or more
*be* a natural born citizen
And Obama has sworn under oath that he *is* (as the Constitution says he must *be*)...
It does not say what is necessary to show it, prove it or what any means for “vetting” is. That’s up to the states themselves to vet and make sure that the candidates meet the qualifications.
And what they have done is sworn an oath that they are qualified..., Obama has, the other candidates have and they have in the past...
—
And in addition the State of Hawaii says that he *is* exactly what the Constitution says he must *be*...
http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2009/09-063.pdf
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‘i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
This shows that there is no Constitutional issue or question. So, when there is no Constitutional issue at problem here with the Qualifications for office, why would the Supreme Court get involved? Which is why they didn’t get involved.
—
And if you want to get Obama to show his birth certificate, you’re going to have to get a state law to that effect, which is what I’ve been proposing since the election.
And you’ll notice that no one is saying to ignore the Constitution...
OK. We're on the same page.
As long as I have your attention, what if Obama's mother did not marry his father?
We posted it so that others would know that the left is flooding the web with simlar documents ...
For your information there is a lot more being done behind the scene than on the open threads.....Sorry you’re not part of the group of researchers and privey to all the information.
No it is in plain english:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
The ‘grandfather’ clause is just conspiracy BS. Please quote me the establish case law that invalidates the 2nd phrase of the above. (That’s a rhetorical question, because you can’t do it, there is no case law to that effect)
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1703
<
Well..., you’re right, I should remind you since you tend to forget a lot of details... LOL...
BFR CoLB troll who always writes LOL
BFRCoLBTWAWLOL
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.