Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
Because that’s when they requested it. If you requested yours tomorrow would it be sealed and notarized the day you were born, or the day you requested it? The seal and signature certify that it is a geniune copy of the real deal.
Do bears s**t in the woods?
|
|
吃驚さん 、my point is that A4 size paper seems anachronistic: I don't believe that a 1964 Australian government document, as the Bomford original purports to be, would have been printed on A4 paper. I don't think Australia adopted the use of A4 paper until the 1970s. |
|
And then you want to claim with certainty it's bogus, oy
about that ‘announcement’ - don’t forget the Frank Marshall Davis connection. He wrote for a commie paper in Hawaii for a number of years. Both papers that printed the ‘announcement’ were printed in the same print-shop. FMD, as a commie-union member, would have had access to THE PRINTERS.
From what I am seeing it's looking like the Aussie is a fraud and the Kenyan one is real, well the document anyway.
good point
In any case it was well dissected in a short time - next!
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
Compare with this, from page 17 of the "U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs," hosted on the Department of State website:
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf
7 FAM 1133.2-2 Original Provisions and Amendments to Section 301(CT:CON-204; 11-01-2007) a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952, section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The ten-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period. As originally enacted, section 301(a)(7) stated: Section 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph."
The two factors being in error in the ‘announcements’ makes them not believeable. The missing entry for the Nordyke twins and the address of another family is too much error for so simple an entry. The birth of twins had to be quite an occasion for the Islands, especially to a new doctor on the Islands.
OTOH, there can’t be more than a handful of libraries that archive the Honolulu newspapers for more than 40 years. On the islands, probably the University and public library... on the mainland . . .? Can’t be more than 2 or 3...
I know if you can get into the log files you can tell, is that how it was done or do you know?
I'm just wondering if there is another way
|
|
My point was that, with the specialized equipment required, it doesn’t seem very feasible that someone would alter copies and place them in libraries. It would be difficult to determine which libraries to place the altered copies in and even more difficult to place enough copies to make it unlikely that someone would choose a library with an unaltered copy. |
|
I would add, when the paper was allegedly scanned. As we know, timestamps can be "falsified" as well.
I prefer Davis to after the fact microfilm, but I prefer Grandma to Davis, I think.
You could mail in your birth record to the health people in Hawaii back in the day. Some believe that O’s grandma did that when O was getting born in Kenya.
OFF TOPIC!!
IN case you guys are stuck on this thread like me.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308328/posts?page=1
Defense officials say two nuclear-powered Russian attack submarines have been patrolling in international waters off the East Coast for several days.
I wonder if any of the families listed on that day’s announcements kept a copy of the paper as a remembrance for the child ... like ‘This is what was news the day you were born, and you were news!’ For years my Mother had a copy of a Arlington County area newspaper for the day I was born announcement. But then I was born the day the atom bomb was dropped ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.