Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
This is what I just said in post #5904, in regards to my current position...
Well, I’ve got a pretty basic position mapped out for myself. It breaks down into three areas...
(1) I’m going to go by the official Hawaii pronouncement, unless something solid comes up (in a court of law) that disproves it.
(2) Since everyone wants to see the birth certificate, I’m going to continue to work for enacting a state law for that purpose (Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and Azrizona already working on it).
(3) The issue of natural born, as far as parents and their citizenship, I’m going to let the Supreme Court decide on it and I’ll take their decision.
That’s where it boils down for me right now...
He seems OK so far,...the question was raised by lots of others.
The Book and Page number are the same on both forms. That’s statistically highly improbable. At least one of these documents is fake or has been altered.
That site is down, but thanks for your work.
The page info on the source webpage indicates it was last modified Tuesday, June 05, 2007 6:15:37 AM. I’m sure there is a way to fake it, but that Bomford birth certificate is a part of an extensive family tree. Chances are, its the real one and the Obama BC is the fake.
"The question isn't whether the image has been photoshopped, but whether the actual paper document is valid. Nothing else is relevant."
Does the fact that this was found by a person who has dogged Polarik and been an Obama stooge make you think twice as to whether the Bomford one is the one that has been forged?
You might also want to take a look at the seal.
It doesn’t matter where his parents were born; only their citizenship matters.
And yes, just like "photo shopping" a pic, a file create and/or mod timestamp can be programmaticly modified (i.e. falsified) as well. Guess we'll have to wait for the actual document to be "expertly" verified (IF that ever happens).
Leo Donofrio says that was the problem with President Chester A. Arthur (21st President) and his father, which made him not qualified to be President.
It sounds like someone should have gotten a Supreme Court Decision after they found out about that one...
My copy of my BC is a Photostat. It is a negative image, with with writing on black background.
(Also, some of you may remember (in the 50s) libraries had a machine that microfilmed the book card and your library card. If it was overdue, they sent you a negative print as notice.)
So, right or constitutionally wrong, Obama’s parents citizenship won’t realistically factor in becuase of precedent of these other POTUS with foreign parents.
Still, he needs to prove his own citizenship. Period. Arrogant POS.
Natural Born Citizen
Both are parents are U. S. Citizens AND child was born in the U.S. mainland
U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)
Citizen
Child was born to at least to at least 1 US Citizen Parent (under federal statute)OR was born in the U.S. mainland OR Naturalized under the US Constitution 14th Amendment, Sec. 1
U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)
Native Born Citizen
Born in the U.S. mainland
US Constitution 14th Amendment, Sec. 1
U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)
Yep, and it's easy.
Here, try it. Double-click on the time on the bottom right-hand corner of your screen.
Change it from today's date to the same date in 2007.
Create a document, edit it, and save it. It'll be time stamped in 2007.
Just be sure to change the year back to 2009 when you're done or when you send an email out from Outlook, Eudora, etc., no one will be able to find your message as it would be chronologically arranged with any other emails from two years ago.
Well, I’ve already said what my position was on the whole thing (just above) in my three-part breakdown — and on this one, it was to accept the Supreme Court decision, whatever that happens to be...
Then perhaps it's too early to form any strong opinions, one way or the other?
” I hope I can take it easy from now on.LOL “
I expect the left to twist and distort the few facts we know to be true.
Actually, I think it’s only one fact that we can be 100% certain is true-BHO was born.
The ignorance and arrogance from many on the right
is appalling and pretty revealing.
They’re as condescending and sneering as the left typically is and equally as misinformed .
We’re all too dumb to find the name of Barry’s birth hospital- O’Reilly brags that he can do it in less than 24 hrs,
he just doesn’t feel like it.
Maybe they’re all scared.. knowing this bunch in DC- that’s a distinct possibility.
If the day ever comes when a court finally decides Barry
has a duty to be honest and open with the American people,
I guarantee that the sneering Holier than Thous on the right
will say it was their idea all along.
I wonder if any of them (former POTUS aside from those grandfathered in) where "Governed" at birth, by a foreign government? Barry, from his campaign web site, admitted such.
How much damage did Arthur do to the country? I freely admit I know almost next to nothing about him. The founding fathers intrigue me.
Exactly. As long as this argument is just people arguing over the internet about pictures on websites it’s all irrelevant.
Joe Miller at factcheck.org, Orly, Keyes, the Obama Campaign, or anyone besides a COURT OF LAW is not a controlling legal authority.
All I want is the truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.