Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sessions: Sotomayor filibuster not "in the works"
Politico ^ | 5/27/09 | Glenn Thrush

Posted on 05/27/2009 9:08:35 AM PDT by bdeaner

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, is saying for the first time that he thinks the GOP won't push for a filibuster on Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to succeed David Souter on the Supreme Court.

"The nominee has serious problems," Sessions said on CNN Wednesday morning. "But I would think that we would all have a good hearing, take our time and do it right. And then the senators cast their vote up or down based on whether or not they think this is the kind of judge that should be on the court. ... I don't sense a filibuster in the works."

Sessions said it was still possible he could support Sotomayor, who has drawn serious flak from conservative groups.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; filibuster; scotus; sessions; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-213 next last
To: Southack
OH! I get it! We let the radical, Latina make-believe judge on the court and the NEXT one will be another Scalia! Wow! What a strategy!!! You guys at the GOP are soooo much brighter than us knuckle draggers out here in the hills! WHOOOHOO!
101 posted on 05/27/2009 12:11:07 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

I wasn’t aware that she had had a confirmation hearing as of yet.


102 posted on 05/27/2009 12:13:32 PM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece
Sotomayor will push Kennedy further right with her temperament and that’s what we need right now.

Wow! I hope someone videos that!

103 posted on 05/27/2009 12:13:36 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Oh aren’t I.


104 posted on 05/27/2009 12:13:55 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

And amazingly, Obama voted against both.

Another example of his “moderate” nature.


105 posted on 05/27/2009 12:14:53 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Have very irrational! That was worthy of the most stealthy democrap agitprop ever to spittle forth at FR.


106 posted on 05/27/2009 12:16:14 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner
The more I read about her, the more I think she might be the best pick we could hope for.

Obama IS going to get an underqualified, activist, affirmative action elevated, statist on the court. May as well be one this compartively ineffective and addled.

She'll always vote on the left side of any issue, but who will win the debate to win over the fence sitters - when it's Sotomayor vs. Scalia?

107 posted on 05/27/2009 12:16:36 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

Weasel words. Sounds like the usual GOP RINO Central cave-in...


108 posted on 05/27/2009 12:22:18 PM PDT by Czar ((Still Fed Up to the Teeth with Washington))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Have very irrational! That was worthy of the most stealthy democrap agitprop ever to spittle forth at FR.

Can we try it again in English, please?

109 posted on 05/27/2009 12:26:12 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Replace ‘Have’ with ‘How’.


110 posted on 05/27/2009 12:28:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Which of my three posts on that thread are you referrijng to?
111 posted on 05/27/2009 12:30:43 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

GOP Eunuch


112 posted on 05/27/2009 12:40:19 PM PDT by stratman1969 (IMPEACH OBAMA for putting terrorist security ahead of American security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

Seems like Sessions is not the man that we thought he is. Ah, we have been fooled again! The GOP leaves us flat.


113 posted on 05/27/2009 12:44:43 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Ken Starr, like GWB and others, sits around waiting for a Democrat to pat him on the back, and they never do.


114 posted on 05/27/2009 12:46:59 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

But it is the knuckle draggers in the hills who keep renominating these listless GOP senators.


115 posted on 05/27/2009 12:47:45 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
But it is the knuckle draggers in the hills who keep renominating these listless GOP senators.

Truly one of life's great mysteries!

116 posted on 05/27/2009 12:58:39 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Why the hell not?

If this woman isn’t opposable, who the hell would be?

She could only get 11 of 44 opinion to agree with her on four of her cases reviewed by the SCOTUS. If she can’t do better than a 25% approval rate, she’s unfit to serve on that court.

Take any person, who is only doing 25% of the right things in just about any job, and then propose they are worthy of joining an oversight committed of that job.

Her nomination makes no sense whatsoever.


Very well said. I agree.

Of course, in the typical Lib worldview, everyone gets a 10th place ribbon and there are no winners and losers. Mediocrity is a virtue and everyone is the same.

Remember, the firefighters in CT had their stellar test scores THROWN OUT because they scored too high on the test! This was the case Sotomayor summarily dismissed. She is part and parcel of this mindless lockstep cabal.
117 posted on 05/27/2009 12:59:42 PM PDT by khnyny ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’m waiting to see how the mainstream media investigates Sonia Sotomayor compared to its furry over Sarah Palin.


They have already done that, I saw it this morning.

“She was picked by Obama and is non-white female, therefore she may have well been selected by the hand of God himself. Anyone who does not believe this is racist without a doubt. Any republicans who vote against her are racist and risk their seat in the next election.”

(in so many words, thats the jist of what I have read)

118 posted on 05/27/2009 1:08:04 PM PDT by envisio (Sexual Beer & BBQ Ribs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

Alabama republicans suffer from RINO disease.

Sessions voted to confirm Holder, and I expect the treasonist trend to continue.


119 posted on 05/27/2009 1:08:16 PM PDT by Creek Injun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

Do republicans not realize they are the OPPOSITION PARTY?

/rhetorical question not needing an answer

We do not need to walk across the aisle unless it is to punch them in the nose. OPPOSE FOR GOODNESS SAKES!


120 posted on 05/27/2009 1:09:27 PM PDT by Jemian (PAM of JT ~~ Caligula, just like his Kenyan ancestors, is selling his countrymen into slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson