Posted on 08/20/2007 10:30:08 PM PDT by Coleus
SOMETIMES tragic occurrences force us to stop and think those are the moments that crystallize our perceptions of human relations. I found myself in such a state with the passing of a constituent, friend and fellow conservative who also happened to be gay. Our conversations convinced me that my beliefs in limited government can be shared across the chasms that liberals and conservatives perceive to separate us ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation. That conclusion is not popular on either side of the left-right spectrum: Liberals don't believe gays should be conservative and conservatives don't believe gays can be conservative, especially when a radical left gay contingent dominates media attention and right-wing conformists place their own moral judgment before individual freedom.
The Republican Party claims to be a "Big Tent," and rightfully so, as the core conservative principles of the party revolve around individual liberty and a limited government that serves to protect that liberty. These ideas can help our party cut across lines of "group identity," because the idea of freedom is appealing to groups that lack the political clout necessary to keep government out of their pocketbooks and lives. Historically, gay Americans have struggled for the freedom to live their lives the way they choose in order to pursue happiness. This is the American Dream, the cornerstone of conservative thinking, and it is these principles that make the increasingly influential gay community the conservative movement's natural ally.
It may surprise some to learn that the very same conservative who refused to be coerced into performing civil union ceremonies by government believes gay voters should be conservative, yet this very instance points to our common ground a commitment to the rights of the individual and opposition to the power of a collectivist state. The media like to portray conservatives as wild-eyed ideologues, which is unfair. Of the philosophies that have directed civilization, conservatism has resulted in the most liberty for people around the world. It is at the hands of the liberal welfare state that individualism is destroyed; thus the failure of communism, fascism and socialism in promoting a signature American entitlement "the pursuit of happiness."
Americans take that phrase for granted, but the idea was culture-transforming. Happiness derives its meaning from the Middle English hap, meaning "chance" or "luck." It is the same root present in the words perhaps or happenstance. The idea present in the words "pursuit of happiness" is the notion that individuals can make their own happiness. Happiness is not purely a matter of luck, but a goal to be pursued in a free environment characterized by limited government. Our Founding Fathers held this truth to be so "self-evident" that they declared it was the indisputable right of all individuals to pursue happiness. With this belief, many members of the gay community have played a critical role in the conservative movement. Conservatives from Terry Dolan to Andrew Sullivan prove there has been no shortage of influential gay leadership. Arguably, their involvement is even greater in the conservative wing of the party than in the moderate middle.
Upper income brackets
Many gay adults are also in upper income brackets, making the issue of low taxes, which conservatives have staked their reputation on, an important one. The principles of limited government that keep Big Brother out of our personal lives must also keep him out of our pocketbooks. Liberal Democrats may not care what individuals do in their bedrooms, but they are already rattling their tax-hiking sabers to let us know they do care what individuals do with their money. Obstacles to achieving our real goal of reducing the size of government and limiting its ability to interfere in our lives must be torn down. Gays shouldn't expect government to foist acceptance of their lifestyle on others; religious conservatives shouldn't expect gays to abandon an integral part of their being.
Barry Goldwater once remarked that government cannot pass laws to "make people like each other." His words still ring true today. Labeling people "homophobes" or "bigots" if they refuse to accept the entire gay agenda creates political fractures that work against individual liberties and serve to keep gay voters in the Democratic Party's political ghetto. The Republican Party must reestablish its commitment to the rights of the individual while respecting the moral code of one subset and upholding the freedom of another. Quite a challenge, indeed. However, the Big Tent needn't become a kaleidoscope of political policies designed to appeal to a large crowd at the expense of sacrificing principles.
Rather, it must transcend mere politics by becoming a manifestation of the principles that culminated in our Declaration of Independence and attract those who share this vision. The principles that are the underpinning of conservatism will ultimately make room in the tent for a surprisingly wide range of membership.
Reestablishing a commitment
In memory of the fine gentleman who inspired this article, I will reestablish my commitment to understanding and the core principles of conservative thought that I believe will best serve our future. My friend fought a tragic inner battle that tormented him to suicide. No one will ever understand the emotional turmoil that destroyed his life. The demons that haunted him and drove him to such a dark and lonely end also know no ethnic, gender or sexual-orientation boundaries. The boundaries of infinity are large enough and eternity long enough for all of us.
So let the values that we share, as mutual as those terrible instances of suffering that each of us can encounter, allow us all to strive for happiness during our brief stay on Earth. Thanks, buddy, see you in a better place. Steve Lonegan, a Republican, is mayor of Bogota.
Actually, I’d prefer they retreat back into their filthy perverted closet -—— where they clearly belong.
Moisturize--moisturize--moisturize...
Good post, Cal
The left has always relied upon propaganda to seduce/deceive its followers. Actually the method of operation has become quite centrist or as many claim mainstream these days. Some of the 'big' tent republicans will accept whatever is offered upon the big pie plate so long as their own social programs are funded.
Thus we know that when our Christian founding fathers said “the pursuit of happiness” they were actually granting rights to homosexuals hoping to get lucky.
Leave it to the RINOs to find the Cornhole in the Constitution!
I just vomited a little in my throat. Yuck.
Communism was always about social programs. Social programs is dependency on the government. Communism is state-ownership.
You get it. There is no so called income fixation/cutoff range for conservatives. It is rather a belief, a set of ideals that we strive to live by.
Please do not push the homosexual affluent agenga on me. Please do not push the idea that conservatism has a dollar figure.
Most of us work for a living and find class warfare to be repugnant.
The center poles of the Republican tent have been: Pro-life, pro-freedom, pro-self-government (as opposed to big government), pro-national security/sovereignty, pro-family, pro-morality.
If they're allowed to pull out the center poles, the tent will be flat on the ground, and useless. And America will be a whole lot worse off.
Give it up , and get thee to a tent of thine own choosing.We will stay home.
It is amazing B4. I’ve posted this info many, many times. It usually kills a thread. You would think a site of true conservatives would take this and scream from the highest mountaintops.
Yes indeed. That is why it is hysterically funny to hear people claim to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal. Another of the accepted big tent ideas of recent political history.
>>>We will stay home.
That would be ‘surrending’ to them.
How would it be possible for the GOP to keep homosexuals out of the party?/sarc
>>>That is why it is hysterically funny to hear people claim to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal.
Third major premise of Communism:
“There is no such thing as innate right or wrong. To lie, is that wrong? Not for the cause. To steal, is that wrong? Not for the cause. To kill, is that wrong? Not for the cause”
Lenin, V.I., ‘Selected Works’, Vol. IX, p. 477
It’s one reason I’m shocked that Lonegan is going this direction. While “Conservatives” can try to reach out to gay voters on taxes or national security, we’re never going to see eye to eye on gay marriage or special rights (or the NAMBLA goal, a total abolition of same-sex age of consent laws). The funny thing is, gays had better pray the Communists or Mohammadan hordes never fully take over America, because they’ll be about the first ones to be gotten rid of. Not even their most hated opponents of fundamentalist Christians would go that far to get rid of them.
Also, needs to be recognized, homosexuality is the RED HERRING. This 'big tent' of homosexuals is the Log Cabin Republicans. The Log Cabin Republicans are affiliated with an organization started by a known communist and is affiliated with an anti war movement.
Harry Hay was a Communist. An admitted communist. And he started Stonewall. And the Log Cabin Republicans are admitted political allies with Stonewall and the CPUSA as per the 2004 RNC anti war protests.
From NAMBLA:
-----------------------------------------------------------
There are national security issues too since this group funds the anti war movement.
Stonewall's AntiWar movement funded by International A.N.S.W.E.R.
I am tired of the sodomy lobby already... NOTE: The Gaystapo salute... |
“For over 30 years, Botswana had the fastest growing economy in the world. Since independence, Botswana has had one of the fastest growth rates in per capita income in the world. Botswana has transformed itself from one of the poorest countries in the world to a middle-income country with a per capita GDP of $11,200 in 2006. Economic growth averaged over 9% per year from 1966 to 1999. “
Looks great right? Free markets rule, right?
BUT
“Botswana has been hit very hard by the AIDS epidemic; the average life expectancy in Botswana at birth has declined from 64 years in 1990 to 50.6 years in 2007. Botswana residents, along with those of neighbouring Swaziland and Zimbabwe, have some of the shortest average lifespans in the world. Approximately one in three Botswana has HIV, giving Botswana the second highest HIV infection rate in the world after Swaziland.”
In other words, you can be a great fiscal conservative but if everyone is screwing around, that’s the end of the country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.