Posted on 08/20/2007 10:30:08 PM PDT by Coleus
Actually, I’d prefer they retreat back into their filthy perverted closet -—— where they clearly belong.
Moisturize--moisturize--moisturize...
Good post, Cal
The left has always relied upon propaganda to seduce/deceive its followers. Actually the method of operation has become quite centrist or as many claim mainstream these days. Some of the 'big' tent republicans will accept whatever is offered upon the big pie plate so long as their own social programs are funded.
Thus we know that when our Christian founding fathers said “the pursuit of happiness” they were actually granting rights to homosexuals hoping to get lucky.
Leave it to the RINOs to find the Cornhole in the Constitution!
I just vomited a little in my throat. Yuck.
Communism was always about social programs. Social programs is dependency on the government. Communism is state-ownership.
You get it. There is no so called income fixation/cutoff range for conservatives. It is rather a belief, a set of ideals that we strive to live by.
Please do not push the homosexual affluent agenga on me. Please do not push the idea that conservatism has a dollar figure.
Most of us work for a living and find class warfare to be repugnant.
The center poles of the Republican tent have been: Pro-life, pro-freedom, pro-self-government (as opposed to big government), pro-national security/sovereignty, pro-family, pro-morality.
If they're allowed to pull out the center poles, the tent will be flat on the ground, and useless. And America will be a whole lot worse off.
Give it up , and get thee to a tent of thine own choosing.We will stay home.
It is amazing B4. I’ve posted this info many, many times. It usually kills a thread. You would think a site of true conservatives would take this and scream from the highest mountaintops.
Yes indeed. That is why it is hysterically funny to hear people claim to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal. Another of the accepted big tent ideas of recent political history.
>>>We will stay home.
That would be ‘surrending’ to them.
How would it be possible for the GOP to keep homosexuals out of the party?/sarc
>>>That is why it is hysterically funny to hear people claim to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal.
Third major premise of Communism:
“There is no such thing as innate right or wrong. To lie, is that wrong? Not for the cause. To steal, is that wrong? Not for the cause. To kill, is that wrong? Not for the cause”
Lenin, V.I., ‘Selected Works’, Vol. IX, p. 477
It’s one reason I’m shocked that Lonegan is going this direction. While “Conservatives” can try to reach out to gay voters on taxes or national security, we’re never going to see eye to eye on gay marriage or special rights (or the NAMBLA goal, a total abolition of same-sex age of consent laws). The funny thing is, gays had better pray the Communists or Mohammadan hordes never fully take over America, because they’ll be about the first ones to be gotten rid of. Not even their most hated opponents of fundamentalist Christians would go that far to get rid of them.
Also, needs to be recognized, homosexuality is the RED HERRING. This 'big tent' of homosexuals is the Log Cabin Republicans. The Log Cabin Republicans are affiliated with an organization started by a known communist and is affiliated with an anti war movement.
Harry Hay was a Communist. An admitted communist. And he started Stonewall. And the Log Cabin Republicans are admitted political allies with Stonewall and the CPUSA as per the 2004 RNC anti war protests.
From NAMBLA:
-----------------------------------------------------------
There are national security issues too since this group funds the anti war movement.
Stonewall's AntiWar movement funded by International A.N.S.W.E.R.
I am tired of the sodomy lobby already... NOTE: The Gaystapo salute... |
“For over 30 years, Botswana had the fastest growing economy in the world. Since independence, Botswana has had one of the fastest growth rates in per capita income in the world. Botswana has transformed itself from one of the poorest countries in the world to a middle-income country with a per capita GDP of $11,200 in 2006. Economic growth averaged over 9% per year from 1966 to 1999. “
Looks great right? Free markets rule, right?
BUT
“Botswana has been hit very hard by the AIDS epidemic; the average life expectancy in Botswana at birth has declined from 64 years in 1990 to 50.6 years in 2007. Botswana residents, along with those of neighbouring Swaziland and Zimbabwe, have some of the shortest average lifespans in the world. Approximately one in three Botswana has HIV, giving Botswana the second highest HIV infection rate in the world after Swaziland.”
In other words, you can be a great fiscal conservative but if everyone is screwing around, that’s the end of the country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.