Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why wasn't Mary's sin passed on to Jesus?
The Orthodox Presbyterian Church ^

Posted on 07/29/2013 7:55:48 AM PDT by Gamecock

Question:

A non-Christian asked if we teach that Jesus was sinless because he did not have a human father, wasn't his human mother, Mary, sinful? Why wasn't her sin passed on to her son, Jesus?

Answer:

You ask an important question about the sinlessness and perfection of Jesus Christ.

As you suggest, if there is any way in which Christ partakes of sin, he is disqualified from being the only redeemer of God’s elect (Westminster Shorter Catechism, Q. 21). The testimony of Scripture about this is clear. Hebrews says that Christ was tempted in all points as we are, yet without sinning (Heb. 4:15). Christ challenged his adversaries to prove that he had sinned and they could not (John 8:46). As the apostle Paul put it, “For our sake he made him [Christ] to be sin, who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Cor. 5:21, cf. 1 Pet. 2:22, 1 John 3:5). He is a high priest unlike any other who is “holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens” (Heb. 7:26). His title as the Lamb of God (John 1:29) also draws our attention to his innocence.

The early church thought deeply about this as it formulated clear statements about Jesus Christ having two natures, a divine nature and a human nature, yet being one person. Christ unites in himself uniquely and in an unrepeatable way, this union (called the hypostatic union) of the human and the divine. This is the mystery of the Incarnation that the creeds of the church confess.

The way in which God answers your question is in the mystery of the virgin birth. The Scriptures begin from, what one theologian terms, “above” (Donald Macleod). John 1 or Philippians 2 show this movement from the eternal Son of God to the incarnate Son of God. This is how the Westminster Shorter Catechism summarizes it:

Christ, the Son of God, became man, by taking to himself a true body and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, and born of her, yet without sin. (Q. 22)

As Matthew described it, Mary was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit (1:18), and then the angel explained it to Joseph: “that which is conceived in her [Mary] is from the Holy Spirit” (1:20). The explanation to Mary herself, in response to her “How will this be, since I am a virgin?” (Luke 1:34), leaves any human agency out of the incarnation in the normal way of conception, for the angel tells Mary, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore, the child to be born will be called ‘holy’—the Son of God” (Luke 1:35). Without further description of how this would occur, the Bible testifies that the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary (the same idea as the cloud which overshadowed the Mount of Transfiguration) in such a way that she indeed became the bearer of the Holy One of God (Gal. 4:4); and her offspring, Jesus Christ, remained without sin. God does not specify in greater detail than this how the conception of Jesus by-passed Mary’s own sinfulness to preserve Christ’s sinlessness, but the rest of Scripture, as I indicated above, affirms that Christ did not inherit our sin nature. He came to be the Second Adam (Rom. 5) who could forgive sins because he himself was both the One offended and himself sinless.

The glory of the grace found in Jesus Christ is that though he was without sin, yet he had pity upon sinners so as to die in their place while we were enemies, ungodly, and sinful (Rom. 5:6, 8, 10). We need a Savior who is fully human to bear patiently with us, yet is able to atone for our sin as the final and perfect sacrifice. The sinlessness of Christ makes a passage like Isaiah 53:9–11 so marvelous in that Christ had no deceit in his mouth and by his death he made many to be accounted righteous.

I hope this is of some help.


TOPICS: Apologetics; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: jesus; mary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last
To: RansomOttawa

If Christ prexists with the Father how is he created in Mary’s womb as a new creature?


101 posted on 07/29/2013 1:44:33 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Human blood cells, like every other cell in the body, have 46 chromosomes, 23 of which are contributed by the father, 23 by the mother. A female egg always has X (female) chromosomes, whereas a sperm has either an X OR Y chromosome, so that an XX fertilzed egg, a zygote, is a Female, or an XY is a Male.

The Bible doesn’t tell us anything about the genetics of Jesus, however, we do know he was a normal male (as he was circumcised on the 8th day, and, was allowed into the Temple to worship (as only normal males were)).

I know of no scientific fact that makes “the blood contributed by the father,” as again, blood cells contain XX or XY chromosomes like all other human cells. [One reason why there are no real “trans-sexuals” as without artificial hormone treatments and surgery, everyone is either male or female—as they were born....and ALL their cells continue to have either XX (female) or XY (male) chromosomes(discounting very rare people with chromosome deformity/disease).] Children can and do have different blood types (A+, O-, etc.) than their fathers too.

If one were to guess—at the mystery of Jesus conception He would probably have XO chromosomes, where O is that unique set of 23 chromosomes created directly by the Holy Spirit. As someone indicated above, Paul descibes Adam as the culpable sinner in the Fall...and Eve as merely decieved... Hence perhaps our sin nature is actually passed on by the Human father’s chromosome...of which every human in history has had, coming down from Adam....except Jesus.

The creedal & biblical understanding though is simply, mysteriously, that Jesus is fully God and fully Man, one Person with two natures.

Again though, we need to remain uncertain as to how Jesus conception came about....since Holy Scripture doesn’t say, and leaves it a mystery. This is where Rome has made a mistake—by proposing HUNDREDS OF YEARS AFTER THE EYE-WITNESS TESTIMONY OF THE APOSTLES (the New Testament) an idea of Mary’s own immaculate conception—to try to explain, what God’s Word does not. Mary’s immaculate conception really is pure myth.


102 posted on 07/29/2013 2:03:22 PM PDT by AnalogReigns (because the real world is not digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Virtually every one of the Church Fathers you quote can also be shown have believed specific heterodox things—which neither the Roman Church, the E. Orthodox, nor classical Protestatants teach today.

Besides that—in none of your quotes is it proven, however virtuous and admirable they understood Mary to be, that they believed she was BORN without sin......


103 posted on 07/29/2013 2:08:43 PM PDT by AnalogReigns (because the real world is not digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
According to the Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano and the Sudarium ...Christ's blood type was AB

Interesting because AB is the referred to as the UNIVERSAL ACCEPTOR.

BTW, the blood on the Shroud of Turin is said to be AB also.

104 posted on 07/29/2013 2:11:11 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
If Christ prexists with the Father how is he created in Mary’s womb as a new creature?

His humanity was added to his Deity at the Incarnation.

105 posted on 07/29/2013 2:53:54 PM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RansomOttawa

So incarnation took place at the moment of conception with the egg in Mary’s womb.


106 posted on 07/29/2013 3:11:27 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
So incarnation took place at the moment of conception with the egg in Mary’s womb.

As opposed to . . . ?

107 posted on 07/29/2013 3:24:30 PM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
The earliest Christians believed it.

Irrelevant. There's a reason to stick with the inspired word of God. People stray.

108 posted on 07/29/2013 3:25:54 PM PDT by BipolarBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Alex Murphy; Biggirl; Gamecock
Luke 1:28 does use the word kecharitomene, which literally means "one who has been graced" or “I favor, bestow freely on”.

Acts 6:8 refers to Stephen as plErEs charitos, which literally means "full of grace" and just the same as the description used of Jesus in John 1:14.

So if Catholics insist that Mary was sinless because of the use of kecharitomene they must also believe that Stephen was also sinless since the version of the word charitos along with the word plErEs gives Stephen the same “full of grace” as Jesus but does not give that to Mary.

109 posted on 07/29/2013 3:45:50 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
>> Her mother St. Anne was blessed by the Holy Spirit in order than the birth of the Blessed Virgin Mary be immaculate. Hence the immaculate conception.<<

Scriptural reference please. Book, chapter, verse.

110 posted on 07/29/2013 3:51:12 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MarDav
>>Christ, and Christ alone, is the only One ever referred to in Scripture as being “full of grace [and truth]” - John 1:14.<<

Not so. Acts 6:8 refers to Stephen as plErEs charitos, which literally means "full of grace" and just the same as the description used of Jesus in John 1:14.

111 posted on 07/29/2013 3:55:32 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
"Scriptural reference please. Book, chapter, verse.

You've not been drinking your Kool-Aid®. He may give you a quote from Ignoblius or Hippocampus or somebody but . . . Bible verse . . that's a tough one there.

112 posted on 07/29/2013 3:59:39 PM PDT by BipolarBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Quote your points with scripture citations....and I will agree to what is written. Offer me man’s words, popish or otherwise, and I’ll still defer to the Word of God....

You are free to disagree, as am I, it’s the beauty of liberty!

Best;


113 posted on 07/29/2013 4:13:35 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: LearnsFromMistakes
Then, a couple thousand years later, science catches up with God. The blood of the child does not mix with the mothers blood. Sometimes the blood of the 2 can actually be toxic to the other.

Where did you get this hoopla from? The blood does mix, which is why sometimes it's fatal for a mother whose blood has the opposite Rh factor status, when the first child's blood sensitises her blood, and her body fights the second child due to her body learning that the child is "foreign". This is aside from the fact that fetal cells enter the mother's circulation, get lodged in different places in the mother's body and thrive, and likewise, mother's cells in the fetus. It's an open connection. It's why when a mother drinks alcohol whilst pregnant, the child gets it, too.

It's astonishing how much folks are willing to perform mental gymnastics to cram reality to bend around their dogma.

114 posted on 07/29/2013 4:24:43 PM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
34 “How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?” 35 The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called[b] the Son of God. 36 Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be unable to conceive is in her sixth month. 37 For no word from God will ever fail.”

I think verse 35 is about as close an explanation as possible

115 posted on 07/29/2013 4:28:38 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (http://thegatwickview.tumblr.com/ -- http://thepurginglutheran.tumblr.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

According to Proloevangelium of St. James:

Saint Ann was born in Bethlehem and married Joachim from Nazareth in Galilee. Joachim was a shepherd given the task of supplying the temple of Jerusalem with sheep for sacrifices.

After twenty years of marriage Ann and Joachim had no children. Once, when Joachim overheard ridicule because of their childless state, he is said to have gone into the desert to plead with God to give them a child. After a time of fasting an angel appeared to assure Joachim he and Ann would be given a child they were to name Mary and dedicate to God.

In the meantime Saint Anne wondered where her husband had gone and in her despair at having been barren she prayed while she watched newborn birds in their nests in her garden. She cried out, “Why was I born, Lord?” That is when angel appeared to tell her she would soon give birth to a daughter she was to name Mary. The story continues with Ann and Joachim’s joyous reunion at the golden gate of Jerusalem.

After her birth Ann and Joachim dedicated Mary to God at the temple of Jerusalem and she spent much of her childhood there. When Mary was fourteen they betrothed her to Joseph of Nazareth and so Mary’s story continues with the birth of her son, Jesus, and his life on earth.

The life of Saint Ann and her connection as holy mother of Mary and grandmother of Jesus was very popular to early Christians. In the year 550 a church was built in honor
of St. Anne in Jerusalem. It is believed to be near where Anne, Joachim and Mary lived.

Since the Seventh Century the Greek and Russian Churches have celebrated feasts honoring St. Joachim and St. Ann. The Western Churches began to celebrate the feast of St. Anne in the Sixteenth Century.
The feast of St. Ann is July 26th (western) or July 25th (eastern calendar). There is no mention of Ann in the New Testament. The story of St. Ann comes chiefly from the Protoevangelium of James which only dated back to the second century.

St. Ann, patron saint of mothers and women in labor and minors, is symbolized by Mary in her lap holding the infant Jesus.


This is my, and millions like me, faith and to try to explain it to a thick headed agnostic is very difficult.


116 posted on 07/29/2013 4:30:16 PM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

“Not so. Acts 6:8 refers to Stephen as plErEs charitos, which literally means “full of grace” and just the same as the description used of Jesus in John 1:14.”

No, he isn’t. He is described as pleres pistis - Full of faith:

“And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people.Full of faith, not of grace.


117 posted on 07/29/2013 4:42:41 PM PDT by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Look at the source.

This is not truthful in my opinion.


118 posted on 07/29/2013 4:46:59 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Is so.


119 posted on 07/29/2013 4:56:59 PM PDT by Gamecock (Member: NAACAC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
There is no doubt that Mary, Mother of Jesus/Yeshua, is the most wonderful woman/human to ever live.

The problem arises with the syncretism of goddess worship (the slow invasion of what was once powerful and shoved aside by Christianity). Whether the object of worship is Diana, Athena, Semiramis, Astarte...each and all have tried to elbow their way into Christianity and corrupt it.

This is the tension regarding Mary and her position in the Church. How do we make sure that our honor and devotion to Mother Mary is not subverted by those demon goddesses who seek the same?

120 posted on 07/29/2013 5:01:45 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Liberals' first line of defense is emotion...the fall back position is specious reasoning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson