Posted on 05/17/2006 9:08:53 PM PDT by Full Court
font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4" color="#990000">From Operation Rescue to Operation Convert
May 21-27, 2006 |
by TIM DRAKE |
Also in the Register: Randal Terry, CatholicRandall Terry has become Catholic. Tell me about your family. How did you come to know Christ? How did you first get started in pro-life work? What led to the founding of Operation Rescue? How many times were you arrested? When did you first take an interest in the Catholic Church? Which theological hurdles were the most difficult for you to jump? I understand that you are awaiting word on the annulment of your first marriage. Can you tell me why you chose to be received into the Church (without being able to receive the Eucharist), before the resolution of your annulment? Tell me how your reception into the Church came about. What was your greatest fear? How do you expect your evangelical colleagues will react to news of your conversion? Do you anticipate that your conversion could hurt you in your Senate race in a predominantly Protestant state?
|
To-manna, To-manna
It's only a day away...
You know, if you could turn that into a script, I'd be willing to bet we could get Tom Hanks to play the lead...
"I'd be willing to bet we could get Tom Hanks to play the lead..."
I can see right away you are not an Old Testament scholar like Alex and me, or you would never have recommended a ham for an Old Testament part.
If you were half the scholars you thought you were, you would recognize the implications of the Nougat Covenant.
What about all the people with peanut allergies? Did God say, let them eat.... Dove?
"What about all the people with peanut allergies?"
I'm glad you brought up that point and I think this will also cover the heresy that arose because of the infamous "Nougat Covenant" that was slipped in unawares by silly women. If you add up the value of 666, the number of you know who, you will find it corresponds to the letters in "peanut allergy". Which means that any one not able to eat of the manna (Snickers)because of the allergy might not be a legal Child of Israel. Now this is where the heretical "Nougat Covenant" comes in. When some wolves in sheep's clothing slipped in unawares and could not partake of the sacred Snickers they palmed off as an original writing this pseudo-epigraph entitled "Nougat Covenant" which said that all those who for any reason could not partake of the sacred Snickers, for the low, low sum of two yonim, could substitute marshmellow fluff or yellow, marshmellow, chickies for the really authentic, orthodox, and thoroughly annointed, nougat, Snickers. I have to wash my hands just typing ths. See, I averted my eyes too.
What a tower of cards you've constructed there bd.
No doubt you deny the trinitarian nature of the Three Musketeers...
"No doubt you deny the trinitarian nature of the Three Musketeers..."
That's it, that's it. I'm ready to ping the Mod. When you can't win on the logic of the position you attack personally. I'll have you know it was not me who streamlined the bar, removing the last vestiges of the individuality of the three. I didn't erase the personality of the bar by making it appear as one bar in three modes instead of three distinct segments in one bar. This is what happens when you let people who are not grounded revise the authorized version.
LOLOLOL!
Go right ahead. I bought a confectionary indulgence with M&Ms.
" I bought a confectionary indulgence with M&Ms."
I see now where this is heading. You belong to the Secret Order of the M&M. Now I know why you were upset with my reference to the number 666. A little light lighteth the whole loaf. I know my scripture!
Ah, but your post number has betrayed you. It is well known that "2i2" is the area code of New York City birthplace of the famous Dead Sea Tootsie Roll scrolls.
"Ah, but your post number has betrayed you"
Diversion doesn't become you. You know full well I was ready to expose the fact that the secret society you belong to published the infamous "Nougat Covenant". And I'm beginning to get that uneasy feeling that this whole Snickers and Zero bars thing is a put up deal from another secret society to cause dissension in the ranks. We haven't heard from them since they started this confusion. As you can see, Ive been learning a lot from studying old "24" segments and I'm not to sure about that "Dove" offering either. Even paranoids can have real enemies. Hmmm.
I'm going to have to ask you to trust me on this.
"I'm going to have to ask you to trust me on this."
The checks in the mail, honest.
I have to sign off. My secretary and para legal have been running into my office wanting to know what I'm laughing so hard about. I have to finish some letters otherwise I can't bill for this fun.
Law isn't fun?
see ya
The point I was making was...circumcision of an eight day old infant was not a voluntary thing. It was a requirement of God. It was to be a sign of his covenant with Abraham and his descendants......some of which were Jews.
Also, Jesus was baptized by the Baptist. He couldn't be baptized until the Baptist began his ministry.
God could have seen to it that Jesus would have been baptized as an infant. He did not, and the the fact that Jesus set his example, as an adult, speaks volumes.
There is no mention or example of infant baptism in scripture. It is a myth perpetuated by the mainstream church. "When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: But when I became a man, I put away childish things." [Corinthians 13:11] This verse by itself should be justification for adult baptism.
"Snickers rot your teeth, and then your criticism will really be toothless."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.