A Few of FR's Finest....Every Day...08-14-03...Dems: Vote No on Recall, but if you get the urge...

Billie; JohnHuang2 | JohnHuang2

[Billie]

A Few of FR's Finest....Every Day

Free Republic made its debut in September, 1996, and the forum was added in early 1997.   Over 100,000 people have registered for posting privileges on Free Republic, and the forum is read daily by tens of thousands of concerned citizens and patriots from all around the country and the world.

A Few of FR's Finest....Every Day was introduced on June 24, 2002. It's only a small room in JimRob's house where we can get to know one another a little better; salute and support our military and our leaders; pray for those in need; and congratulate those deserving. We strive to keep our threads entertaining, fun, and pleasing to look at, and often have guest writers contribute an essay, or a profile of another FReeper.

On Mondays please visit us to see photos of A FEW OF FR'S VETERANS AND ACTIVE MILITARY

If you have a suggestion, or an idea, or if there's a FReeper you would like to see featured, please drop one of us a note in FR mail.

We're having fun and hope you are!
~ Billie, Mama_Bear, dansangel, dutchess, Aquamarine ~

Dems: Vote No on Recall, but if you get the urge...

by JohnHuang2

Anybody who thought that Arnold Schwarzenegger had the election in the bag, better think twice. California Democrats, whose Governor, Gray Davis, faces a historic recall election October 7, think they've hit upon a win-win strategy. Even with once-thriving California in ruins, they've got the perfect fall-back provision, they say. Sure, polls show that, were the recall held today, not only would voters give Ol' Gray the boot, he'd be on a plane to Nigeria -- seated right next to Charles Taylor. And two months is hardly enough time to rehabilitate a corpse. But, while most California Dems have written Gov. Screw-Up off, they're betting on Lieutenant Governor Screw Up, Cruz Bustamante, whose name will appear on the ballot. His, Schwarzenegger and a scant 200 other candidates.

The Democrat strategy -- the party's theme message to voters -- boils down to this: Be strong, say No to Recall. Say Yes to Wait, because Recall Can Wait. Recall activity outside the context of 4-year terms is wrong. But if you can't wait -- if you've gotta have recall -- have Safe Recall: Vote Bustamante! Davis's strategy -- a pure 'just say no to recall' campaign, offering no other options -- is just too simplistic, say many Democrats. Teaching voters not to have recall, alone, won't work -- given the enormous pressures on Golden State voters these days. Top Democrat strategists know this full well. The Davis model -- promote waiting until Davis's current term is up before having Recall activity -- is too simplistic, too unrealistic. The recall drive is among the most powerful forces in humans living under Gray Davis. Almost everybody under Gray Davis gets the urge for Recall. The Davis model ignores this. But having Safe Recall -- voting Bustamante -- allows voters to express dissatisfaction with Davis without the risk of unintended victory for Republicans. With Safe Recall, voters can focus, relax -- enjoy the pleasures of Recall without the fear of putting Republicans in office. Having unprotected Recall can be dangerous. So, say No to Recall, but if you've gotta have it, have Safe Recall -- vote Bustamante!

Another challenge for Schwarzenegger is the growing sense he's unqualified -- not up to the job. Completely not up to the job, in fact. Sure, The Terminator is great with one-liners, but being great with one-liners ain't enough. Let's be realistic. Gray Davis gave California the biggest budget deficits ever -- more than all other states combined. Gray Davis gave California the lowest bond ratings ever. Gray Davis gave California the worst energy crisis ever. Question: Can The Terminator do all that -- keep racking up record deficits, keep state bond ratings in the toilet and bring back the energy crisis? No, Schwarzenegger just isn't qualified for that. Sure, Gray Davis can make screwing up California look simple, but don't let that fool you. It requires enormous skill, talent, and, above all, experience. Failed leadership is a Davis forte, and I doubt Schwarzenegger can furnish failed leadership quite like Davis has. Learning to make a hash of things like Ol' Gray has managed takes years of experience. Besides, notice how Schwarzenegger refuses to be specific? Mr. Schwarzenegger, how do you intend to rack up $38 billion in deficits, sir? And be specific! How will you bring back the energy crisis, sir? How will you keep bond ratings in the toilet -- and drive business out of the state, like Davis has? And no generalities -- lay out a detailed plan!

With Schwarzenegger's lack of qualifications -- and few believe Schwarzenegger can provide the failed vision, unbridled corruption and ineffectiveness Ol' Gray has so assiduously worked to achieve -- Democrats are clicking their heels, convinced this election is in the bag for 'em as they slide into oblivion.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Meanwhile, speaking of ousting tyrants, "indicted war criminal and former warlord Charles Taylor went into exile in Nigeria on Monday, under international pressure and besieged by rebels who have overrun most of the West African country," CBS News reports.

CBS News: "Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo welcomed Taylor at the international airport in the capital, Abuja. The two leaders shook hands and embraced before walking down a red carpet together.

"Taylor arrived in Nigeria hours after surrendering power to his vice president in the capital, Monrovia."

Well, that makes three -- count 'em, 3 -- regime changes on Bush's watch: The Taliban, Saddam and now the Taylor regime are no more. Democrats say Bush suffers a growing credibility gap on the international stage. Especially after his accurate uranium charge in the State of the Union address. Monday's tumultuous events in Liberia are testament to Bush's growing credibility gap. Bush's 'growing credibility gap' got Taylor to high-tail out, without firing a shot. "God willing, I will be back," vowed Taylor. Most dismiss such talk as empty rhetoric. No word yet on whether a write-in candidacy in California is in the cards for Taylor, though.

    

The Recession's growing credibility gap

For Democrats, especially '04 wannabes, a once promising recession appears increasingly mired in quagmire. Deepening quagmire. By almost every key measure, from rising personal income to falling weekly initial jobless claims, the recession is struggling badly.

Democrat campaign strategists had hoped the recession would be a 1-termer (at least) -- lasting all 4 years of Bush's tenure, then resigning from public service in January, 2005, as a new Democrat president gets sworn in. This is the rosey scenario, or cakewalk theory. The hope was that the recession would unseat Bush as it did his father back in '92. Hardline Democrats

-- the Howard Dean wing of the party -- see this recession as recession-lite, and there is no way it can beat Bush by trying to be recession-lite, they argue.
Dean proposes disarming the economy -- repeal of the Bush tax cuts across-the-board, turning recession-lite into real recession. Less hardline factions, led by Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, argue that, to increase the recession's appeal among more moderate swing voters and peel them away from Bush, recession-lite is the only way to go. He notes the recession that undid Bush's father was, for all intents and purposes, recession-lite, too.

Although the recession had remained remarkably popular with Democrats since taking office in January, 2001, there are growing signs of trouble. Among Democrats, the recession had once commanded towering 100% approval ratings in its handling of the economy, but no more. Recent polls show rising doubts on the recession's credibility as an almost daily barrage of bullish news on the economy, from Wall Street to Main Street, takes its toll. Everyday, it seems, the recession gets pummeled by gloomy news of an accelerating economy. Some Democrats wonder if the recession had exaggerated evidence of its existence, or of the imminent threat it posed on the Bush administration. The slide in confidence in the recession and rising disapproval of its performance among Democrats likely will only grow worse, if recent economic signs are any harbinger.

Among the slew of worrisome signals fueling growing doubts over the recession's credibility: The latest government report on second quarter GDP (Gross Domestic Product) shows a better-than-expected 2.4% annual growth rate, despite the war in Iraq and terror jitters, with analysts expecting 4%-5% growth for the second half; not only is consumer spending sizzling, business investment -- whose anemic performance had been a big drag on the economy since the dot-com collapse -- is gaining momentum as well; the surge in business spending is, like the stock market rally, a leading indicator -- it presages future hiring, pushing the key unemployment rate down; the housing boom is still booming, despite the recent jump in interest rates (prompted by an accelerating economy); the service sector soared in July, the Institute for Supply Management's key index rocketing to 65.1 percent, up from an already bullish 60.6 in June. The sizzling July figure was the sizzle-ing-est since the survey began exactly 6 years ago, and presages 6% GDP growth for the 3rd quarter; factory orders in June jumped 1.7% -- better than expected, propelled by soaring durable goods orders, the index's 3rd increase these past 4 months; productivity jumped a 5.7 percent annualized rate for the 2nd quarter, while initial jobless claims dropped below the benchmark 400k/week for the first time in 6 months for the week ending August 2.

Amid the recession's increasingly sluggish performance, the growing frustration has driven Democrats to ask, 'who lost the recession?' Or was the recession distracted by coverage of Kobe Bryant, Scott Peterson and the California recall election? Did the recession mislead us into thinking this would all be a cakewalk? Did the recession willfully exaggerate its capabilities? If the tax cuts undermined the recession's momentum, why not repeal 'em all?!

These are just some of the questions Democrats are increasingly asking themselves these days.

Anyway, that's...

My two cents

THIS WEEK'S THREADS 08-11-03 Military Monday 08-12-03 High Road to China 08-13-03 FReeper Pets (MamaBear's Boyz)

Opinions by our own 'King of Ping' The guy's good, folks!

Thanks, Mixer!

1) Click on the graphic to open the Calendar.
2) Once there you can click on any month and even click to the right to go into next year. Once you are in the month that you joined FR you will need to click on the number in the calendar and then an add item screen will come up.
3) In the next box enter your name in the "Calendar Text" field and then click on submit.
4) If any of the screens fail to load simply click on refresh in your browser and that will usually fix it.
5) If all else fails or simply if you want me to do this for you send me a FReepmail and I will gladly do it for you. ~Mixer

[Billie]

I'm soory, I stepped on your toes. : )

Not at all. :) (I think we've done this before, come to think of it! Remember the Bushmobile?!)

I like yours better -

Me too! LOL!!

Sigh! What I like about you, wolfie - your humility. :)

[lonestar]

Reality, take a deep breath and read this...an old one making the rounds again.

TEACHING MATH OVER THE YEARS

Teaching Math in 1950: A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?

Teaching Math in 1960: A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?

Teaching Math in 1970: A logger exchanges a set "L" of lumber for a set "M" of money. The cardinality of set "M" is 100. Each element is worth one dollar. Make 100 dots representing the elements of the set "M." The set "C," the cost of production contains 20 fewer points than set "M." Represent the set "C" as subset of set "M" and answer the following question: What is the cardinality of the set "P" of profits?

Teaching Math in 1980: A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

Teaching Math in 1990: By cutting down beautiful forest trees, the logger makes $20. What do you think of this way of making a living? Topic for class participation after answering the question: How did the forest birds and squirrels "feel" as the logger cut down the trees? There are no wrong answers.

Teaching Math in 2000: A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $120. How does Arthur Andersen determine that his profit margin is $60?

Teaching Math in 2010: El hachero vende un camion carga por $100. La cuesta de production es........

[LadyX]

'Dear John' Letter # 1,000:

Thousand replies - thousand thoughts - thousand laffs at the expense of the Dems!
Keep 'em flowin' JH - - -

Do they really think Gray-Light Gov. Bustamove can hold a candle to Ahnold's popularity? Gonna put him in an Orkin Exterminator suit and think he can prevail?

Holy mackeral, looking at yer collage, Billie - what a fine kettle of phish!!
Talk about one crowded phish tank - - -

Struck today, I am, by the hopelessness that has to be building among them.
I mean, how many more things can go so darned right??!!

Keep us herded in the right direction, JH.....

LadyX

[Billie]

You just made my day. : )

My pleasure. It was nice to get one of those wolfie hugs in return.

[ST.LOUIE1]

Not at all. :) (I think we've done this before, come to think of it! Remember the Bushmobile?!)

I do remember that one. LOL

I like yours better -

Me too! LOL!!

Sigh! What I like about you, wolfie - your humility. :)

Thank you, dear, my mama raised me right. : )

[MeekOneGOP]

Oh, I see. For some reason they changed the pic to a jpg. It was a gif file ...

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/Senate/members/dist21/assets/photos/Zaffirini_Action.jpg

[ST.LOUIE1]

You just made my day. : )

My pleasure. It was nice to get one of those wolfie hugs in return.

'My' pleasure. : )

And you answered with a smooch! AhhhhRooooo! : )

[Billie]

Billie can teach you how to do graphics, she's the master....er mistress....er....the best!

Aha! So my weinie for governor is better after all. LOL!

[Calpernia]

But that thread was a gas!

[Calpernia]

Dachshunds make a GREAT cartoon!

[ST.LOUIE1]

Billie can teach you how to do graphics, she's the master....er mistress....er....the best!

Aha! So my weinie for governor is better after all. LOL!

Nope, didn't say that. I meant as a 'teacher' you're the best.

You're the best with 'most' graphics too, except when you try to out graphic me. LOL!

Just teasin'. : )

[jwfiv]

Good afternoon, Billie...) Thanks for delivering JH2's words and views.

JH2, I had to really focus in reading your Two Cents today...with the absurd, the satirical and the true so closely woven together, I had to go slow and be mindful of which is what.

"Safe Recall"...)))))))) Too cool...thank you, kind sir.

Hello to ALL the Finest...)

(Thanks for that good breakfast, Diver Dave...)))

[lonestar]

Wonderful news here. My friend's daughter got her report from MD Anderson and she does NOT have breast cancer.

[ST.LOUIE1]

But that thread was a gas!

LOL

Too much so. Can you imagine swimming in the ocean and having 'that' pull up next to you : )

[ST.LOUIE1]

Wonderful!!!!

[LadyX]

Well - All The Women, that is..:)) That is wonderful news, lonestar, and we thank you for letting us know the outcome.
I can relate, having had such an excision in 1996 that turned out to be abnormal tissue, sometimes a precursor, but not cancer. Annual follow-ups with my oncology surgeon (the last in July) have shown no return.

By the way, neither the examining physician nor the oncology surgeon were able to feel the lump, deep within.

Do not assume since you cannot feel it, one is not there. Mine was the size of a pencil eraser, and not palpable, but clearly seen on the x-ray film.

Insist upon and have those mammograms!
The fleeting discomfort is worth the peace of mind.

[Calpernia]

Yes, that is wonderful news!

I know how relieved you feel lonestar. And big hugs to your friend!

[lonestar]

TV commentator and author Arianna Huffington, who launched her campaign for governor with criticism of "fat cats" who fail to shoulder a fair share of taxes, paid no individual state income tax and just $771 in federal taxes during the last two years, her tax returns show.

Campaign ammunition. And they say I'm a b*tch!

[lonestar]

Campaign ammunition. And they say I'm a b*tch!

That's Weinie!

[Molly Pitcher]

Afternoon everyone.! Thanks Billie for the thread, and John, the excellent anaylsis. Enjoying this California mess so much!