Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now the Left turns on RBG: Radicals point blame at late Supreme Court judge for DYING in 2020 as they say it paved way for Amy Coney Barrett
dailymail ^ | 6/24/2022 | james gordon

Posted on 06/24/2022 5:05:31 PM PDT by RummyChick

Liberal Twitter users have taken to the platform to blast the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg following the court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade on Friday.

While a number of journalist lay the blame at former President Trump who got to appoint three conservative justices during his time in the White House, things took a surprising turn when attention shifted to RBG.

Several users saw it fit to blame the late Supreme Court Justice for the court's landmark decision on abortion with some suggesting that had she decided to step down sooner while President Obama was in office, she would have been replaced in turn with a liberal justice.

When Ginsburg died in September of 2020 at the age of 87 her vacancy allowed , Trump to nominate conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett to take her place.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rbg; roe; scotus; whoops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: RummyChick

Did Breyer already step down?


21 posted on 06/24/2022 5:17:19 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Roberts did not vote for it

this is more like a 5-1-3 vote but the 1 gets put in with the 3


22 posted on 06/24/2022 5:17:45 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
This is the God part to this.

She could have retired or died during the Obama Administration...

Remember...it was assumed that Hillary would win...hands down...

23 posted on 06/24/2022 5:18:12 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

not until the end of the term


24 posted on 06/24/2022 5:19:09 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Move over Mother Teresa. Saint Ruthie of Ginsburg is a now revered Saint but for a whole different set of reasons and sanctifications. The Lord has used St Ruth in ways she’s never dreamed would happen. Therefore we hereby decree that June 24th shall become St Ruthie Day.


25 posted on 06/24/2022 5:19:53 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

RGB herself as anyone competent with in any fashion the law and the constitution admitted Roe V Wade was bad law…

These people are just psychotic


26 posted on 06/24/2022 5:20:02 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Thank you.


27 posted on 06/24/2022 5:20:49 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

You have a point. She could have safely secured a liberal seat . we lucked out with her decision and with God taking her when he did AND Mitch holding firm. one of the few things he got right


28 posted on 06/24/2022 5:20:57 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

They gonna burn the dolls of her now that girls good look up to?


29 posted on 06/24/2022 5:22:18 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Yes, but I believe that Roberts only voted with the majority because his vote would not change the outcome. If RGB had been replaced by a liberal, Roberts very well may have voted the opposite way.


30 posted on 06/24/2022 5:22:31 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every leftist is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
She hung on long enough to allow Trump to win so he could appoint a conervative judge, all because she wanted to make hisotry of having the first woman President (Hillary) appointing a female judge to replace the first female judge.

Pardon?

Ginsburg was NOT the first female judge.

She was not even the first female Supreme Court Justice.

31 posted on 06/24/2022 5:22:43 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (It is better to light a single flame thrower then curse the darkness. A bunch of them is better yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

They ought to go take a dump on her grave.


32 posted on 06/24/2022 5:23:15 PM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

https://time.com/5354490/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-v-wade/
The questioning was strong enough that Ginsburg’s husband Marty Ginsburg, one of the fiercest advocates for her judicial career, got academics to call the White House and clarify that she was talking about the Court’s thinking in 1973, not the ultimate decision.


33 posted on 06/24/2022 5:24:14 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I wish these cultists would follow the path of their brethren, Heavens Gate, and do it quickly.


34 posted on 06/24/2022 5:26:56 PM PDT by bigfootbob (Arm Up and Carry On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Best post about this, EVAH!!!


35 posted on 06/24/2022 5:28:46 PM PDT by bigfootbob (Arm Up and Carry On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Ok.
However, she still wanted that trifecta.


36 posted on 06/24/2022 5:28:55 PM PDT by Jonty30 (I would sell my family for a billion dollars and then buy them back when go on clearance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: RummyChick

Are they “peacefully” protesting at the graveyard?


38 posted on 06/24/2022 5:30:18 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Leftists can’t determine gender in scientific terms.
They want the keys to lopitofames and addadicktomes.

They can’t grasp what is Constitutional or isn’t.

It’s beyond their powers to know what’s legal or reasoned
when it comes to voting.

They have no idea that a fetus is a living human being.
Asked they balk at a straight answer. Is it a fish? Is it
a dog? Is it a mouse? What is it if not human? Crickets.

Now they fail to grasp death, and our ability to live one
two or three more years due to sheer willpower.

Oh but these are the folks who want to explain the birds,
bees, and chameleons to children. They should also
decide for us who reads to them. They want to decide for
us who stuffs dollar bills down Bob, er Bobby’s G-String.

They also want to tell big business what they have to do.
They want to tell us whether the Constitution is valid,
or if it’s okay to have immigration laws.

It is they who should judge jury and executioner for the
unborn.

Much of this touches on God’s directives. Oh, but they
are convinced they rule over Him too.


39 posted on 06/24/2022 5:30:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Huh? even Ruth agreed that roe v wade was a BS decision.


40 posted on 06/24/2022 5:31:41 PM PDT by proust (All posts made under this handle are, for the intents and purposes of the author, considered satire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson